<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Priorities for the Next President: An Urgent, Measured Innovation Policy (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2008/10/09/priorities-for-the-next-president-an-urgent-measured-innovation-policy-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2008/10/09/priorities-for-the-next-president-an-urgent-measured-innovation-policy-part-ii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:23:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gollin</title>
		<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2008/10/09/priorities-for-the-next-president-an-urgent-measured-innovation-policy-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/?p=1145#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Nice article, Kali. I agree on the urgency of a comprehensive national innovation policy.  This would address each type of intellectual property (patents, trade secrets, copyrights, and trademarks) and how well they are serving to define the balance between exclusivity for innovators and access by others that is key to promoting innovation This is a distillation of my thinking developed in this year&#039;s book &quot;Driving Innovation: Intellectual Property Strategies for a Dynamic World,&quot; and my recent commentary &quot;Innovation Must Come Next.&quot; http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/intellectual-property-holds-key-our/story.aspx?guid=%7B4815FAB6%2DCA2C%2D467C%2D9C0E%2D7E23C813EB93%7D&amp;dist=msr_1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, Kali. I agree on the urgency of a comprehensive national innovation policy.  This would address each type of intellectual property (patents, trade secrets, copyrights, and trademarks) and how well they are serving to define the balance between exclusivity for innovators and access by others that is key to promoting innovation This is a distillation of my thinking developed in this year&#8217;s book &#8220;Driving Innovation: Intellectual Property Strategies for a Dynamic World,&#8221; and my recent commentary &#8220;Innovation Must Come Next.&#8221; <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/intellectual-property-holds-key-our/story.aspx?guid=%7B4815FAB6%2DCA2C%2D467C%2D9C0E%2D7E23C813EB93%7D&amp;dist=msr_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/intellectual-property-holds-key-our/story.aspx?guid=%7B4815FAB6%2DCA2C%2D467C%2D9C0E%2D7E23C813EB93%7D&amp;dist=msr_1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
