<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cert. Grant: Do Prisoners Have a Right to Use New Technology To Prove Their Innocence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2008/11/03/cert-grant-do-prisoners-have-a-right-to-use-new-technology-to-prove-their-innocence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2008/11/03/cert-grant-do-prisoners-have-a-right-to-use-new-technology-to-prove-their-innocence/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:27:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Samis</title>
		<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2008/11/03/cert-grant-do-prisoners-have-a-right-to-use-new-technology-to-prove-their-innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Samis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/?p=1737#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>Regarding &quot;formalists on the Court have a hard time swallowing any constitutional rights that are not spelled out in explicit detail in the text of the Constitution&quot;: 

How do formalists square this requirement with the Ninth Amendment, which both implies the existence of constitutional rights not spelled out in the text and commands their protection?

It is a problem that the Framers did not explain how to determine which putative rights they sought to protect, but perhaps that indicates that the Framers were not formalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;formalists on the Court have a hard time swallowing any constitutional rights that are not spelled out in explicit detail in the text of the Constitution&#8221;: </p>
<p>How do formalists square this requirement with the Ninth Amendment, which both implies the existence of constitutional rights not spelled out in the text and commands their protection?</p>
<p>It is a problem that the Framers did not explain how to determine which putative rights they sought to protect, but perhaps that indicates that the Framers were not formalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
