<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo To The New Justices: That&#8217;s Not How We Do Things On The Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2009/11/25/memo-to-the-new-justices-thats-not-how-we-do-things-on-the-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2009/11/25/memo-to-the-new-justices-thats-not-how-we-do-things-on-the-court/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:44:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard M. Esenberg</title>
		<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2009/11/25/memo-to-the-new-justices-thats-not-how-we-do-things-on-the-court/comment-page-1/#comment-27152</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard M. Esenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/?p=8154#comment-27152</guid>
		<description>It certainly agree that ideological bias can frustrate an objective discussion of judicial craftsmanship. It can also push the justices into opposing &quot;camps&quot; which circle the wagons even when those ideological interests are not at stake.

I would be more willing to see these cases as the &quot;old guard&quot; admonishing the &quot;new guard&quot; if I thought that these were sins that the Court regularly avoids, i.e., that we really don&#039;t do things that way. I&#039;m not sure that I can say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly agree that ideological bias can frustrate an objective discussion of judicial craftsmanship. It can also push the justices into opposing &#8220;camps&#8221; which circle the wagons even when those ideological interests are not at stake.</p>
<p>I would be more willing to see these cases as the &#8220;old guard&#8221; admonishing the &#8220;new guard&#8221; if I thought that these were sins that the Court regularly avoids, i.e., that we really don&#8217;t do things that way. I&#8217;m not sure that I can say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence Berres</title>
		<link>http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2009/11/25/memo-to-the-new-justices-thats-not-how-we-do-things-on-the-court/comment-page-1/#comment-27151</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence Berres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/?p=8154#comment-27151</guid>
		<description>Some might find it more interesting that Justice Bradley, joined by the Chief Justice, at one point puts this critique in terms of the judicial role being analogous to a baseball umpire&#039;s, Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45 ¶99.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some might find it more interesting that Justice Bradley, joined by the Chief Justice, at one point puts this critique in terms of the judicial role being analogous to a baseball umpire&#8217;s, Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45 ¶99.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

