Nov
15
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Yes, Eco-Terrorists Are Real Terrorists
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | November 15, 2009 | 1 Comment
On the night of July 20, 2000, Katherine Christianson, Bryan Rivera, and two companions damaged or destroyed more than 500 trees at a United States Forest Service facility. Was it a prank? A dare? A harvest for the thneed industry? No, Christianson and Rivera were members of the eco-terrorist group Earth Liberation Front, and their target was the Forest Service’s genetic-engineering [...]
Nov
7
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: If You Own a Gun, Don’t Steal Cable
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | November 7, 2009 | 1 Comment
In 2005, Kevin Schultz pled guilty to one count of trafficking in counterfeit telecommunications instruments. His offense involved modifying telecommunications equipment for the purpose of stealing cable. His sentence? Two years on probation, including a period of home detention.
Two and a half years after his first conviction, federal agents searched Schultz’s home and found a [...]
Oct
31
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Of Hearsay and Bootstraps
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | October 31, 2009 | 1 Comment
The court staked out no new legal ground in its opinions last week, so I’ll just briefly describe a case that nicely illustrates a classic problem in evidence law. Based on information provided by a confidential informant, Milwaukee police stopped a Ford Excursion on suspicion of drug activity. Inside were Marc Cannon (the driver), David Harris (Cannon’s cousin), [...]
Oct
26
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Other Bad Acts and the “Intricately Related” Doctrine
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | October 26, 2009 | Leave a Comment
Criminal law and procedure are structured around the act requirement: a defendant is prosecuted for performing a specifically identified unlawful act, the criminal trial is designed to determine whether the defendant actually committed that act, and, once the defendant has been convicted and punished, we commonly say that he has paid his debt to society and should be [...]
Oct
21
Federal Sentencing and the Lack of Theory in Criminal Justice
Posted by: Chris Donovan | October 21, 2009 | 1 Comment
Defendants in federal criminal cases often cooperate with the government to get their sentence reduced, especially when facing an extremely high statutory mandatory minimum (it is not uncommon for federal defendants to face mandatory minimums of ten years or higher). In these cases, to get below the mandatory minimum, the government must file a motion to [...]
Oct
19
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Good Enough for Government Work
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | October 19, 2009 | Leave a Comment
Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), certain drug offenders face a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment if they have two prior drug felony convictions. As befits such a draconian statute, special procedural protections have been adopted to ensure that the mandatory minimum does not take defendants by suprise at sentencing. Thus, 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1) requires [...]
Oct
13
A Case For Jury Nullification
Posted by: Chris Donovan | October 13, 2009 | 7 Comments
Jury nullification is a controversial issue in criminal law. There are undoubtedly many definitions of it, but it occurs most fundamentally when a jury acquits a defendant even when the letter of the law says that he or she committed a crime. Appearing at first blush as a theory for anarchists, it is a well-established power [...]
Oct
11
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Halfway Houses Back on the Menu
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | October 11, 2009 | Leave a Comment
If Congress makes an obvious error in drafting a statute, can a court correct that error by effectively adding something to the statute that is not there? Such was the interesting jurisprudential question the Seventh Circuit confronted last January in United States v. Head, 552 F.3d 640 (2009). Because of a mix-up with statutory cross-references, the [...]
Oct
10
ACS Presentation on 2008-09 Supreme Court Opinions
Posted by: Joshua Pollack | October 10, 2009 | Leave a Comment
With the beginning of the 2009-2010 term of the Supreme Court, the Marquette Chapter of American Constitution Society for Law and Public Policy (ACS) spent a lunch-hour discussing some of the more interesting cases of the past 2008-2009 term. Leading the lunch discussion were Marquette professors Blinka, McChrystal, and Secunda.
Professor Blinka started the lunch discussion [...]
Oct
4
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Reversing a Liddell Progress on Crack Sentencing
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | October 4, 2009 | 1 Comment
The Seventh Circuit continues to struggle with the question of what it means for the federal sentencing guidelines to be “advisory.” In United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the Supreme Court held that the then-mandatory guidelines system violated the Sixth Amendment. The Court corrected the constitutional problem by converting the guidelines from mandatory to advisory. Then, [...]
Sep
27
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: The Limits of Constructive Possession
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | September 27, 2009 | Leave a Comment
The Seventh Circuit had only one new opinion in a criminal case last week, but, fortunately, it was an interesting one. Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), it is a federal crime for felons to possess a firearm. Proof of the crime is easy enough when a felon is found actually carrying a gun. But what if the gun [...]
Sep
19
Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: What Can Be Inferred From a Lie?
Posted by: Michael M. O'Hear | September 19, 2009 | Leave a Comment
When a person is caught in a lie, we normally assume that he is covering something up. But, if a defendant in a criminal case lies on the witness stand, is it fair to assume that he actually did what he was accused of doing? Such was the question in United States v. Edwards (No. 08-1124).
Edwards was arrested [...]


