Trans-formation

Posted on Categories Civil Rights, Criminal Law & Process, Labor & Employment Law, Wisconsin Law & Legal System

A year ago, President Barack Obama issued a proclamation naming June “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Pride Month.”  The proclamation effectively incorporated the transgendered community into President Bill Clinton’s 2000 proclamation, which named June “Gay & Lesbian Pride Month.”  In honor of the transgendered community, their legal rights, and the month of June, it seems appropriate to discuss gender identity discrimination and the infamous “trans panic defense.”

The overall struggle that transgender people face is similar to the struggle that gays and lesbians face, but for transgender people, the progressive change for their legal rights seems to be slower.  Currently, in 38 states it is still legal to discriminate based on gender identity.  Comparatively, 30 states have not yet developed laws against sexual orientation discrimination.  Wisconsin was the first state to ban employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, and it did so in 1982.  However, as of yet, it has not created equal legislation regarding gender identity.

Discrimination based on gender identity is more commonplace than most people realize.  According to the Human Rights Campaign, transgendered individuals suffer from a wide array of injustice including hate crimes, work place discrimination, housing discrimination, credit discrimination, public accommodation discrimination, and even health care discrimination:

[F]emale-to-male transsexual Robert Eads of rural Georgia developed cervical cancer but [he] could not find a doctor to treat him. Twenty simply refused to do so.  He eventually found one more than 130 miles from home, but by then, Eads’ partner said, it was “just too late.” He died in 1999.

Even in the states that have established anti-discrimination gender identity laws, the fight for equal treatment in the workplace is not a closed book.  Organizations like the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) continue to advocate against the protection for transgender individuals on the basis that schools would be required to keep teachers who undergo sex changes.   TVC argues that children should not be “subjected to [a transgendered] man’s bizarre sexual transformation,” as it claims transgender individuals are “seriously mentally disturbed,” despite psychological studies that say otherwise.

One  blog post offered the conservative estimate that transgendered individuals are over ten times more likely to be murdered than individuals of the general population.  The “trans panic defense”—a variation on the classics of insanity, diminished capacity, provocation, and self-defense –has been introduced as a means to justify, or at least excuse, some of these murders.  Cousin to the “trans panic defense” is the “gay panic defense,” which was used in the case involving the high profile murder of Matthew Shepard.  Both defenses are built around the psychological phenomenon called homosexual panic. Psychiatrist Edward J. Kempf in 1920, who coined the phenomenon, described it as an acute, brief reactive psychosis suffered by the target of unwanted advances by homosexual or transgendered individuals.

The phenomenon and its subsequent legal defense seem ludicrous on a number of grounds.  First, it is troublesome that as legal defenses they seem to reinforce and promote negative stereotypes about homosexual and transgendered individuals as sexual deviants and sexual predators. Second, they are unsettling because the defenses seek to substantiate a subconscious bias in favor of heteronormativity, which is prevalent in today’s hetero-centric society. Lastly, a disturbing analogous defense comes to mind. Should there be a similar justification for unwanted or unsolicited flirting with women by heterosexual men, and what would that mean for the male population?  The last critique is somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but the point remains that this phenomenon gives an unbelievable amount of legal weight to what might be a simple come-on.

By and large, as this blog has acknowledged, jurisdictions across the US are progressively restricting the use of the “insanity defense.”  Thus, a call for the elimination of the “trans panic defense” in cases concerning mental defect might be unnecessary.  But the insanity defense is only half of the issue.  These defenses, when tied to claims of provocation, have been relatively successful.  The use of the “gay panic defense” and the “trans panic defense” in the judicial system show no real signs of going away.

One thought on “Trans-formation”

  1. As someone who is transsexual, I’m forced to live with the worry that if I’m a victim of a crime, that I could be one twice over!

    First by the perpetrator, and second by the system.

    There have been a multitude of examples of people who have seriously assaulted and murdered LGBT citizens, and have gotten literally a slap on the wrist! Crimes against LGBTs are especially brutal and horrific: axe handles, fire extinguishers, multiple stab wounds, multiple gunshots, etcetera.

    Sadly, some prosecutors and judges in certain parts of the country see these crimes as minor and some even praise the criminal for getting rid of a scourge in their community!

    Thankfully, there are those jurists who see these crimes as serious and have sentenced those who would prey on LGBT citizens to lengthy prison sentences, and have refused any defense which would put the victim on trial.

    Angie Zapata’s murderer received a life sentence without parole and had added time for hate crimes, which happened in a small Colorado town. Praise goes out to the county prosecutor, who had a microscope put to the office, for this was the first trial after Colorado enacted a hate crimes law which included real or perceived sexual orientation and gender identity.

    I wonder what the attitude of hatemongers and bigots such as the TVC, AFA, ad nauseum would be if there were roving gangs of LGBT youth who targeted straights for assault and robbery on a nightly basis, or worse yet, target straights for murder, then use a “straight panic” defense?

Join the Conversation

We reserve the right not to publish comments based on such concerns as redundancy, incivility, untimeliness, poor writing, etc. All comments must include the first and last name of the author in the NAME field and a valid e-mail address.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.