{"id":12463,"date":"2010-12-20T22:49:43","date_gmt":"2010-12-21T03:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/?p=12463"},"modified":"2010-12-20T22:53:08","modified_gmt":"2010-12-21T03:53:08","slug":"new-law-review-comments-cover-social-networking-wind-farms-deceptive-trade-practices-act-open-records-law-and-purchase-money-security-interests","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2010\/12\/new-law-review-comments-cover-social-networking-wind-farms-deceptive-trade-practices-act-open-records-law-and-purchase-money-security-interests\/","title":{"rendered":"New Law Review Comments Cover Social Networking, Wind Farms, Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Open Records Law, and Purchase Money Security Interests"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Now available online, the recently published student comments in the Marquette Law Review <\/em>cover a wide range of topics.\u00a0 They include\u00a0Nathan Petrashek\u2019s comment <\/a>on the impact of online social networking on Fourth Amendment privacy.\u00a0 Since social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace attract both criminals (e.g., sexual predators, identity thieves) and the police who investigate them, the question whether users have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their voluntary disclosures under the well-established Katz<\/em> test is poised to become a significant issue in the near future. \u00a0Petrashek relies on Fourth Amendment doctrine, as well as the First Amendment right of association and good public policy, to argue that user content should be shielded from police scrutiny in the absence of a warrant.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile,\u00a0Marvin Bynum\u2019s Golden Quill-winning comment <\/a>addresses the feasibility of establishing offshore wind farms in Lakes Michigan and Superior.\u00a0 <\/p>\n

Bynum begins his analysis by describing Europe’s commitment to renewable energy and the highs and lows of the offshore windpower industry abroad.\u00a0 He then explores the federal and state regulatory regimes that govern such projects in Wisconsin and observes that there are significant obstacles facing developers.\u00a0 Bynum argues that we should learn from the European experience and concludes by offering several proposals, such as providing federal loan guarantees and creating a new state office of “offshore wind coordinator,” to promote the development of offshore wind projects in Wisconsin.<\/p>\n

Donald Stroud’s comment<\/a>, which garnered the Silver Quill Award last spring, focuses on the use of Wisconsin’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) to adjudicate simple breach of contract claims in commercial transactions.\u00a0 He describes the Wisconsin Supreme Court\u2019s decision in K & S Tool & Die Corporation v. Perfection Machinery Sales, Inc. <\/em>(2007), which created a way for a contracting party to avoid legitimate but unfavorable terms (in K&S<\/em>, a restrictive forum selection clause) in the contract by asserting a DTPA claim.\u00a0 Stroud observes that indiscriminate applications of the DTPA may (1) disrupt expectations and risk allocations that are fairly negotiated into contracts, (2) conflict with UCC provisions, and (3) go beyond the intent behind DTPA.\u00a0 He recommends the adoption of a “public interest standard” to distinguish between cases that fall within the ambit of the DTPA and those that should be governed by ordinary contract law.\u00a0 He also suggests that the UCC should trump the DTPA whenever the two are in conflict.<\/p>\n

Jessica Farley\u2019s comment <\/a>undertakes an examination of the conflict between Wisconsin’s open records law and the intellectual property interests of private companies that keep public records on behalf of municipalities in a copyrighted format.\u00a0 Farley criticizes the state supreme court decision in WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex<\/em> (2008), which held that a municipality complied with the state\u2019s open records law when it provided the plaintiff with PDF versions of requested records, even though the data contained in such files were not manipulable and, therefore, useless to the plaintiff.\u00a0 She observes that the court dodged the central issue in the case \u2013 whether the open records law requires a municipality to provide records in a more usable format when so requested \u2013 and argues that the statutory language and purpose of the open records law demand meaningful access to information.\u00a0 Farley concludes that in light of this important public interest copyright must yield, and proposes an amendment to the law that would include usability as a factor for determining compliance with the open records law.<\/p>\n

Last but not least, Rachel Helmers has written a comment <\/a>critiquing federal courts’ treatment of negative equity that is rolled into a new car loan as a purchase money security interest (PMSI).\u00a0 PMSI status not only grants super-priority on the collateral (here, the car) to the lender under the UCC, but it also protects the lender from cramdown under the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code.\u00a0 Helmers argues that shielding the negative equity portion of a car loan from cramdown in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy does not effectuate congressional intent in the 2005 amendments and fails to treat similarly-situated creditors alike.\u00a0 She urges courts to follow the “dual status” rule, which would separate the negative equity from the remaining amount of the loan used to purchase the car and treat only the latter as a PMSI.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Now available online, the recently published student comments in the Marquette Law Review cover a wide range of topics.\u00a0 They include\u00a0Nathan Petrashek\u2019s comment on the impact of online social networking on Fourth Amendment privacy.\u00a0 Since social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace attract both criminals (e.g., sexual predators, identity thieves) and the police who investigate […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"","ocean_second_sidebar":"","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"","ocean_custom_header_template":"","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,30,40,67,7,35,48,49,3,75],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computer-law","category-criminal-justice","category-environmental-law","category-first-amendment","category-intellectual-property-law","category-legal-scholarship","category-marquette-law-school","category-privacy-rights","category-wisconsin","category-wisconsin-supreme-court","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}