{"id":19186,"date":"2012-12-20T21:07:13","date_gmt":"2012-12-21T02:07:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/?p=19186"},"modified":"2012-12-20T21:11:18","modified_gmt":"2012-12-21T02:11:18","slug":"remembering-professor-bork-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2012\/12\/remembering-professor-bork-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Remembering Professor Bork"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Bork2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-19191\" style=\"margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;\" title=\"http:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Bork2.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Bork2-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>Published reports of the death of Robert Bork on December 19 not surprisingly dwelled on the most controversial events in his long life in the law.\u00a0 As Solicitor General under President Nixon, Bork in 1975 carried out orders to fire the Watergate special prosecutor.\u00a0 In 1987, Bork was nominated for the Supreme Court by President Reagan but then rejected by the Senate.\u00a0 During the 1990s and 2000s, Bork, while employed by conservative think tanks, vigorously argued that elitist liberals were trying to take over the judiciary.<\/p>\n<p>For my own part, I recall Robert Bork from my first year of law school and from the time before he became a prominent national figure.\u00a0 It seems hard to believe, but I actually had Professor Bork for Constitutional Law.\u00a0 I also had Professor Bork for Legal Research and Writing because the Yale Law School in those distant days folded each student\u2019s instruction in legal research and writing into an arbitrarily selected substantive first-year course.<\/p>\n<p>I have no evidence that Professor Bork ever read the assorted memoranda and briefs I wrote \u201cunder his tutelage,\u201d but I certainly recall his approach to Constitutional Law.\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>He confidently strode into the classroom and led an animated, spirited discussion of what the Constitution meant or should be understood to mean.\u00a0 There was no place to hide but not because of any phony Socratic menace.\u00a0 The chief pedagogical force in the room was quite simply Professor Bork\u2019s powerful seriousness of purpose.<\/p>\n<p>I was too raw at the time to realize that Professor Bork was promoting a distinct variety of \u201cstrict constructionism\u201d or what has come to be called \u201coriginalism.\u201d\u00a0 But I do recall a long week in which Professor Bork insisted the Framers had not envisioned one man-one vote as an operative principle in the election of legislators.\u00a0 Unlike the present, law students in those days were almost always to the left of their professors, and we argued with Professor Bork on this particular issue and on many others \u2013 almost always to no avail.<\/p>\n<p>Specific matters of constitutional interpretation aside, Professor Bork\u2019s teaching of Constitutional Law alerted me to the way interpretations and applications of the law are politically aligned.\u00a0 The dominant ideology casts the law as neutral, as an almost supernatural force in charge of American life.\u00a0 Of course that cannot be.\u00a0 Human beings have preferences and biases, and they bring them to the law.\u00a0 Professor Bork\u2019s detectable conservatism vis-\u00e0-vis the law never came close to winning me over, but it did force me recognize and refine my own \u201cleft of liberal\u201d alignment.\u00a0 Professor Bork, I choose to believe, would like the fact that his teaching spurred political and jurisprudential growth in one of his students.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Published reports of the death of Robert Bork on December 19 not surprisingly dwelled on the most controversial events in his long life in the law.\u00a0 As Solicitor General under President Nixon, Bork in 1975 carried out orders to fire the Watergate special prosecutor.\u00a0 In 1987, Bork was nominated for the Supreme Court by President [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"","ocean_second_sidebar":"","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"","ocean_custom_header_template":"","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[80,68,122,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-constitutional-interpretation","category-judges-judicial-process","category-public","category-us-supreme-court","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}