{"id":25651,"date":"2016-05-09T16:51:38","date_gmt":"2016-05-09T21:51:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/?p=25651"},"modified":"2016-05-09T16:51:38","modified_gmt":"2016-05-09T21:51:38","slug":"commonly-confused-words-part-v","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2016\/05\/commonly-confused-words-part-v\/","title":{"rendered":"Commonly Confused Words, Part V"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve previously posted on words that writers, particularly lawyers, commonly confuse. Those posts are <a href=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2014\/03\/21\/commonly-confused-words-knowing-when-to-choose-the-right-one\/\">here<\/a> (that\/which\/who, more than\/over, few(er), less, amount\/number, farther\/further, since\/because\/as, among\/between, who\/whom, attain\/obtain), <a href=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2014\/04\/03\/more-commonly-confused-words\/\">here<\/a> (a\/an\/the, counsel\/council, e.g.,\/i.e., it\u2019s\/its, principal\/principle, then\/than, utilize\/use, you\u2019re\/your, affect\/effect, tortious\/tortuous, tack\/tact, capitol\/capital, motioned\/moved, flesh\/flush), <a href=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2014\/04\/17\/even-more-commonly-confused-words\/\">here<\/a> (although\/while, assure\/insure\/ensure, complement\/compliment, rational\/rationale), and <a href=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2014\/07\/20\/commonly-confused-words-a-couple-a-few-some-several-or-many\/\">here<\/a> (a couple, a few, some, several, and many).<\/p>\n<p>Today, I\u2019ll cover seven more pairs of commonly confused words.<\/p>\n<p><u>Born\/borne<\/u> \u2013 Both words are past participles of \u201cto bear\u201d; however, only one relates to birth. Use \u201cborn\u201d when referring to literal or figurative birth, such as: <em>She was born in California <\/em>or <em>Wisdom is born from years of experience.<\/em> \u201cBorne,\u201d on the other hand, refers to the other meanings of \u201cto bear\u201d: such as, to carry, to produce, or to bring about. \u201cBorne\u201d would be proper in the following: <em>Costs associated with this litigation will be borne by the defendant<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><u>Good\/well<\/u> \u2013 \u201cGood\u201d is an adjective, \u201cwell\u201d is an adverb. That is, \u201cgood\u201d describes and \u201cwell\u201d modifies or qualifies. <em>A good lawyer writes well.<\/em> \u201cGood\u201d in that sentence describes the noun, \u201clawyer.\u201d (What kind of lawyer? A good one.) \u201cWell\u201d qualifies the verb \u201cwrites.\u201d (How does the lawyer write? Well.) The exception to this good\/well distinction involves health. If you\u2019re asked <em>How are you?<\/em>, the grammatically correct answer would be <em>I am well <\/em>(i.e., your health is good).<\/p>\n<p>Do not use \u201cgood\u201d to modify a verb. We might say <em>That lawyer is good at writing<\/em>, but we certainly wouldn\u2019t say <em>That lawyer writes good<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><u>Lay\/lie<\/u> \u2013 My wonderful colleagues Anne Enquist and Laurel Currie Oates from Seattle University have best explained the distinction between these two words in their <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Writing-Grammar-Punctuation-Writer-Coursebooks\/dp\/1454826983\">book<\/a> <em>Just Writing: Grammar, Punctuation, and Style for the Legal Writer <\/em>(4th ed. 2013). I am drawing from their explanation nearly verbatim but for style changes to fit the form here.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>\u201cLay\u201d means to \u201cput, place, or set down.\u201d \u201cLay\u201d is a transitive verb, which means it must have an object. Something must be put, placed, or set down. For example: <em>Just lay the file on my desk.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo lie\u201d means \u201cto recline or remain.\u201d \u201cLie\u201d is an intransitive verb, which means it does not have an object. Someone or something reclines or remains. For example: <em>The file will lie unopened on my desk until the bill is paid.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><u>Pair\/pare\/pear<\/u> \u2013 A \u201cpair\u201d is a set of two objects. \u201cPare\u201d is a verb that means to trim something or to reduce its size. A \u201cpear\u201d is a piece of fruit. <em>Anna needs to pare down her brief before she files it <\/em>means that Anna has to make some cuts or changes to reduce the length of her brief. She would not \u201cpair down\u201d or \u201cpear down\u201d her brief.<\/p>\n<p><u>Peak\/peek\/pique<\/u> \u2013 I always give mental bonus points to the people who correctly use \u201cpique.\u201d It\u2019s so often misused. \u201cPeak\u201d is a noun that means the highest point, like the peak of a mountain or the peak of a career. \u201cPeek\u201d is a verb that means a quick glance, like <em>Let me take a peek at the bill before you pay it.<\/em> These two often get mixed up, but when you add \u201cpique,\u201d things really get mixed up. \u201cPique\u201d as a noun means a fit of resentment; as a verb it means to annoy or to arouse interest.\u00a0 So, for example, after an argument, I might be in a pique (a noun). More often, though \u201cpique\u201d is used as a verb and here\u2019s where it gets oh-so-mixed up with the other two words. If I\u2019ve written something particularly compelling, my writing might pique the reader\u2019s interest. That is, it might have aroused her interest. I do not peak her interest.<\/p>\n<p><u>Precedent\/precedence<\/u> \u2013 I\u2019ve seen a number of students write something like, <em>The court should follow precedence and hold for plaintiff.<\/em> Such a usage is incorrect. For lawyers, \u201cprecedent\u201d refers to a case that has preceded (come before) the case with which the lawyer is currently dealing, and that previous case may guide a current court on the same issue. <em>Courtney is researching precedent on that issue. <\/em>\u00a0Plural \u201cprecedent\u201d is \u201cprecedents,\u201d though it seems to me that lawyers tend to use \u201cprecedent\u201d in cases of singular and plural cases. The sentence above is a good example. Courtney may be looking for a single case, but she may be looking for a number of previous cases.<\/p>\n<p>However, law students (and some lawyers) might be confusing the plural form \u201cprecedents\u201d with \u201cprecedence.\u201d Hence: <em>The court should follow precedence and hold for plaintiff.<\/em> \u201cPrecedence\u201d has to do with ranking in order of importance or urgency, with something more important or urgent having \u201cprecedence\u201d over something less important or urgent. <em>My brief takes precedence over Jim\u2019s brief because my brief is due earlier. <\/em>That is, I\u2019m saying my brief is more important or urgent.<\/p>\n<p>Now that we\u2019ve established the difference, let\u2019s fix the sentence I started with: <em>The court should follow precedent and hold for plaintiff.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><u>Whether\/whether or not<\/u> \u2013 The word \u201cwhether\u201d expresses some doubt, and it is often used with \u201cor not,\u201d as in <em>We should find out whether or not the law firm is hiring. <\/em>In that sentence, it is unknown if the law firm is hiring. Maybe it is. Maybe it\u2019s not. The word \u201cwhether\u201d itself, though, because it expresses doubt, implies an \u201cor not\u201d; thus, the \u201cor not\u201d is redundant. It\u2019s more concise to simply say <em>We should find out whether the law firm is hiring. <\/em>Maybe it is. Maybe it\u2019s not.<\/p>\n<p>I can think of only one circumstance where \u201cwhether or not\u201d is useful and that is where the writer is expressing not doubt but certainty. That is, <em>I\u2019m going to the conference whether or not Stephen attends<\/em>. That sentence shows the writer\u2019s certainty: it doesn\u2019t matter if Stephen goes to the conference; the writer definitely is. However, where the writer is using \u201cwhether\u201d more equivocally, \u201cor not\u201d is unnecessary in writing.<\/p>\n<p>Next week, I\u2019ll cover another set of commonly confused words!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve previously posted on words that writers, particularly lawyers, commonly confuse. Those posts are here (that\/which\/who, more than\/over, few(er), less, amount\/number, farther\/further, since\/because\/as, among\/between, who\/whom, attain\/obtain), here (a\/an\/the, counsel\/council, e.g.,\/i.e., it\u2019s\/its, principal\/principle, then\/than, utilize\/use, you\u2019re\/your, affect\/effect, tortious\/tortuous, tack\/tact, capitol\/capital, motioned\/moved, flesh\/flush), here (although\/while, assure\/insure\/ensure, complement\/compliment, rational\/rationale), and here (a couple, a few, some, several, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"","ocean_second_sidebar":"","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"","ocean_custom_header_template":"","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,42,122],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-legal-practice","category-legal-writing","category-public","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}