{"id":26199,"date":"2017-01-25T11:12:09","date_gmt":"2017-01-25T16:12:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/?p=26199"},"modified":"2017-01-25T11:23:44","modified_gmt":"2017-01-25T16:23:44","slug":"the-uncertain-future-of-title-vii-lgbtq-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2017\/01\/the-uncertain-future-of-title-vii-lgbtq-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"The Uncertain Future of Title VII LGBTQ Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), employers may not discriminate against individuals based on their gender.\u00a0 Whether Title VII protections extend to sexual orientation and gender identity is less clear.\u00a0 Numerous federal courts have taken the position that sexual orientation <a href=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/istock_generic-scales-of-justice.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-26205 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/istock_generic-scales-of-justice-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"189\" height=\"126\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/istock_generic-scales-of-justice-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/istock_generic-scales-of-justice.jpg 650w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 189px) 100vw, 189px\" \/><\/a>and gender identity are not covered and it is up to the legislature to amend Title VII to explicitly provide protection from or redress for discrimination on these bases. <em>Hamner v. St. Vincent Hosp. &amp; Health Care Ctr., Inc.<\/em>, 224 F.3d 701, 704 (7th Cir. 2000); <em>Spearman v. Ford Motor Co.<\/em>, 231 F.3d 1080, 1085 (7th Cir. 2000).<\/p>\n<p>The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has been critical of the federal courts\u2019 position.\u00a0 Beginning in 2013, the EEOC issued a number of decisions finding that gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination were forms of \u201csex discrimination.\u201d In the recent past, the EEOC has been the driving force behind seeking protection for employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation and gender identity.\u00a0 For this reason, many people expressed concern that the Department of Labor (DOL) took down the EEOC\u2019s \u201cAdvancing LGBT Workplace Rights\u201d document from their website the day President Donald Trump was elected.\u00a0\u00a0 Activists worry that the EEOC will not continue to advance LGBTQ protections under the new administration.\u00a0 It is unlikely that Congress will advance any express protections based on gender identity or sexual orientation.<\/p>\n<p>Reprieve may come from the courts. <!--more-->Since 2013, several federal district courts have denied motions to dismiss filed by employer defendants.\u00a0 Those courts have found it plausible that a plaintiff employee may assert claims based on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination under Title VII.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps it will continue to fall to the courts and not the legislature to advance or clarify what LGBTQ protections exist.\u00a0 Notably, as reported by my colleague and fellow Marquette Law alum, Aaron McCann the full Seventh Circuit is reviewing <em>Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College<\/em>, No. 15\u20101720.\u00a0 As he explains, \u201c[t]he precedent-setting question, now before the full court on review, is whether Title VII\u2019s employment discrimination protections extend to sexual orientation bias. If the Seventh Circuit recognizes a Title VII protection against sexual orientation discrimination, it will be the first federal Court of Appeals to do so.\u201d\u00a0 A decision is forthcoming.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), employers may not discriminate against individuals based on their gender.\u00a0 Whether Title VII protections extend to sexual orientation and gender identity is less clear.\u00a0 Numerous federal courts have taken the position that sexual orientation and gender identity are not covered and it is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":215,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"","ocean_second_sidebar":"","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"","ocean_custom_header_template":"","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[98,19,122],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil-rights","category-federal-law-legal-system","category-public","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/215"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26199"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26199\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}