{"id":30761,"date":"2024-04-03T12:33:08","date_gmt":"2024-04-03T17:33:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/?p=30761"},"modified":"2024-04-03T12:33:08","modified_gmt":"2024-04-03T17:33:08","slug":"highlights-from-the-2024-spring-election-in-milwaukee-county","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/2024\/04\/highlights-from-the-2024-spring-election-in-milwaukee-county\/","title":{"rendered":"Highlights from the 2024 Spring Election in Milwaukee County"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Only a few of the major races on Milwaukee\u2019s spring ballot were competitive. Most notably, the latest Milwaukee Public School District funding referendum passed by fewer than 2,000 votes. Both Biden and Trump put up relatively weak showings in their respective <em>pro forma<\/em> presidential preference votes. Evan Goyke handily won a landslide victory against the incumbent Milwaukee City Attorney.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The following discussion is based on complete, but unofficial, election night vote totals. All demographic data is from the 2020 census. Registered voter statistics are based on the number of registrants <em>entering<\/em> election day; they do not include same-day registrants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MPS Referendum<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1500\" height=\"2100\" src=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS.png\" alt=\"MPS referendum ward results\" class=\"wp-image-30768\" style=\"width:400px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS.png 1500w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS-214x300.png 214w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS-731x1024.png 731w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS-768x1075.png 768w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS-1097x1536.png 1097w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/MPS-1463x2048.png 1463w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1500px) 100vw, 1500px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The referendum received about 41,600 \u201cyes\u201d votes to 39,900 \u201cno\u201d votes. The No\u2019s actually won more wards\u2014172 to 164.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As the map below shows, support for the referendum was strongest in neighborhoods along the lake and on the near west side. Opposition was strongest on the far south and southwest sides. Most north and northwest side wards also voted against the referendum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These patterns do somewhat follow Milwaukee\u2019s racial divisions. The \u201cYes\u201d vote won majority non-Hispanic white wards (53.2% for \u201cYes\u201d) while narrowly losing both majority Black wards (48.4% \u201cYes\u201d) and majority Latino wards (49.4% \u201cYes\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But these differences are small. The presence of children in a ward correlates much more strongly with the referendum vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In wards where <em>fewer<\/em> than 20% of households include a child under 18, the \u201cYes\u201d vote won by nearly two-thirds of the vote, 65.8%. But in places where <em>more<\/em> households have kids, it lost. In wards where 20% to 40% of households have a kid, 45.9% of voters supported the referendum. Where 40% to 60% of households have a kid, the \u201cYes\u201d vote took 46.9%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These are just correlations. We don\u2019t have data on how <em>parents<\/em> themselves voted. But we can say that the MPS referendum was most popular in the parts of the city with the fewest children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1080\" height=\"648\" src=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-30763\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-1.png 1080w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-1-300x180.png 300w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-1-1024x614.png 1024w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-1-768x461.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1080px) 100vw, 1080px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Presidential Preference<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No candidate remained campaigning against Biden or Trump in their Wisconsin presidential primaries. Still, both candidates put up relatively weak showings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Across the entire county, Trump received 73.2% from Republican primary voters. Nikki Haley\u2019s defunct campaign still got 16.6%. In 2020 (with no other named candidates on the ballot), Trump won 97% support among Republican primary voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Biden received 84.5% of the vote, compared with 12.2% for uninstructed delegates, and 2.5% for Dean Phillips. The last primary featuring an incumbent Democratic president was 2012. In that year, Obama won 99.1% of the Milwaukee County vote, and uninstructed delegates received 0.7%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1500\" height=\"772\" src=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-2.png\" alt=\"maps showing the presidential preference results in milwaukee county\" class=\"wp-image-30764\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-2.png 1500w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-2-300x154.png 300w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-2-1024x527.png 1024w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/image-2-768x395.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1500px) 100vw, 1500px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The table below shows the primary results in each municipality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A slim majority of voters participated in the Republican primary in Hales Corners and Franklin. Democrats were in the majority everywhere else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among Republican primary voters, Trump generally did best in the southern suburbs, garnering 80% or better in West Milwaukee, Oak Creek, Cudahy, and Hales Corners. Haley did best in the wealthier north shore suburbs, receiving 30% or better among GOP voters in Shorewood, Fox Point, Whitefish Bay, and River Hills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Activists opposing Biden\u2019s handling of the war in Gaza campaigned in support of the \u201cuninstructed delegation\u201d option in the Democratic primary. \u201cUninstructed\u201d support varied between municipalities with the most support coming in two usually quite different places. Shorewood is the most Democratic municipality in the entire county, and 15% of its Democratic primary participants supported the uninstructed campaign. But \u201cUninstructed\u201d support was even higher, 16%, in Franklin, one of the county\u2019s most conservative suburbs. In general, uninstructed support was higher in the southern suburbs and lower on the north shore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Within the city of Milwaukee, the uninstructed campaign generally performed best in the Riverwest neighborhood, with pockets of significant support scattered elsewhere in the city.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1640\" height=\"1694\" src=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot.png\" alt=\"table showing presidential preference results in milwaukee county municipalities\" class=\"wp-image-30765\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot.png 1640w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot-290x300.png 290w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot-991x1024.png 991w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot-768x793.png 768w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Screenshot-2024-04-03-at-12-28-02-Screenshot-1487x1536.png 1487w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1640px) 100vw, 1640px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Milwaukee City Attorney<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1500\" height=\"2100\" src=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke.png\" alt=\"map showing milwaukee city attorney ward results\" class=\"wp-image-30766\" style=\"width:400px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke.png 1500w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke-214x300.png 214w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke-731x1024.png 731w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke-768x1075.png 768w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke-1097x1536.png 1097w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Goyke-1463x2048.png 1463w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1500px) 100vw, 1500px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Evan Goyke won 63.3% of the vote, defeating Tearman Spencer in the race for City Attorney. He performed particularly well in the Washington Heights neighborhood and the neighborhoods along the lake. Spencer\u2019s support was mainly limited to parts of the north side of the city.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Goyke carried 211 wards (to Spencer\u2019s 124) and 10 of the city\u2019s 15 aldermanic districts. Goyke won more than three quarters of the vote in the 3<sup>rd<\/sup>, 14<sup>th<\/sup>, 10<sup>th<\/sup>, and 4<sup>th<\/sup> districts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Spencer\u2019s best district was the 1<sup>st<\/sup>, where he won two-thirds of the vote, followed by the 2<sup>nd<\/sup>, where he won 63%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Overall Turnout<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1500\" height=\"2100\" src=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout.png\" alt=\"map showing ward turnout as a share of registered voters\" class=\"wp-image-30767\" style=\"width:400px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout.png 1500w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout-214x300.png 214w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout-731x1024.png 731w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout-768x1075.png 768w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout-1097x1536.png 1097w, https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Turnout-1463x2048.png 1463w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1500px) 100vw, 1500px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Interpreting turnout is always challenging, because factors like the mix of elections on a ballot and the competitiveness of those races always vary from one election year to another. Turnout in April 2024 appears to have been middling, compared to recent past cycles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In 2020, about 210,000 voters, or 41% of registered voters, cast a ballot.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>April 2022 saw about 145,000 voters, or 29% of registered voters.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This year, 165,000 voters participated, about 34% of those registered.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>As a share of registered voters, turnout was highest on the north shore. The top-5 municipalities were Glendale, Greendale, Shorewood, Fox Point, and Bayside, among which turnout ranged from 42.1% to 45.4% of registered voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The lowest turnout came in West Milwaukee (22.6%), Cudahy (30.7%), West Allis (31.4%), and Milwaukee (31.6%).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Only a few of the major races on Milwaukee\u2019s spring ballot were competitive. Most notably, the latest Milwaukee Public School District funding referendum passed by fewer than 2,000 votes. Both Biden and Trump put up relatively weak showings in their respective pro forma presidential preference votes. Evan Goyke handily won a landslide victory against the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":207,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"","ocean_second_sidebar":"","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"","ocean_custom_header_template":"","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[349,350],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lubar-center","category-milwaukee-area-project","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/207"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30761"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30761\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30769,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30761\/revisions\/30769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/facultyblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}