{"id":3444,"date":"2026-05-26T00:00:29","date_gmt":"2026-05-26T05:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/?p=3444"},"modified":"2026-05-26T00:00:29","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T05:00:29","slug":"marquette-law-school-poll-finds-4-out-of-5-say-wisconsin-legislature-should-have-passed-evers-gop-property-tax-rebates-and-special-education-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/2026\/05\/26\/marquette-law-school-poll-finds-4-out-of-5-say-wisconsin-legislature-should-have-passed-evers-gop-property-tax-rebates-and-special-education-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"Marquette Law School Poll finds 4 out of 5 say Wisconsin legislature should have passed Evers\/GOP property tax, rebates, and special education bill"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong><em>Also:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Strong majority support for bill among Republicans, independents, and Democrats<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>69% say bill should have been passed now, as opposed to waiting until next year for further information on budget surplus or deficit<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Fewer than 20% say political figures who opposed the bill did the right thing<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>65% say Evers did the right thing in supporting the bill<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Please note: Complete Poll results and methodology information can be found online at <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/category\/results-and-data\/\"><em>law.marquette.edu\/poll<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>MILWAUKEE \u2014 A new Marquette Law School Poll finds 80% of Wisconsin adults say the legislature should have passed a proposed bill using the projected state budget surplus to reduce property taxes, increase special education funding, and provide rebates to taxpayers. Eleven percent say the legislature should have defeated the bill, and 9% don\u2019t know whether the bill should have passed or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The bill, proposed by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republicans Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority leader Devin LeMahieu, passed the Assembly with bipartisan support but was defeated in the Senate on May 13. In the Senate, 3 Republicans joined all 15 Democrats in voting no, while 15 Republicans voted for the bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a rare level of agreement across party lines, 77% of Republicans, 81% of independents, and 82% of Democrats in the poll say the legislature should have passed the surplus bill, as shown in Table 1. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>1<\/strong><strong>: Pass or defeat budget surplus bill<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Party ID<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Pass or defeat<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Should have passed the bill<\/td><td>Should have defeated the bill<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>80<\/td><td>11<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican<\/td><td>77<\/td><td>16<\/td><td>8<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Independent<\/td><td>81<\/td><td>8<\/td><td>11<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democrat<\/td><td>82<\/td><td>10<\/td><td>8<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: On May 11, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republican legislative leaders announced an agreement on a bill that would have used $1.8 billion of the projected $2.5 billion state budget surplus to increase funding for special education, reduce school property taxes by about 5%, and send rebate checks of $300 to individuals, $600 to married couples, who paid state income taxes. It would also have eliminated taxes on tips and overtime. Do you think the state legislature (should have passed the bill), or (should it have defeated the bill)?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The survey was conducted May 20-21, 2026, interviewing 454 Wisconsin adults, with a margin of error of +\/-5.5 percentage points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There was similarly broad and strong support for the bill across ideological lines, with more than three-quarters of conservatives, moderates, and liberals in favor of the bill, as shown in Table 2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>2<\/strong><strong>: Pass or defeat budget surplus bill<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Ideology<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Pass or defeat<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Should have passed the bill<\/td><td>Should have defeated the bill<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>80<\/td><td>11<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Conservative<\/td><td>78<\/td><td>12<\/td><td>10<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Moderate<\/td><td>86<\/td><td>10<\/td><td>5<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Liberal<\/td><td>78<\/td><td>12<\/td><td>10<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: On May 11, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republican legislative leaders announced an agreement on a bill that would have used $1.8 billion of the projected $2.5 billion state budget surplus to increase funding for special education, reduce school property taxes by about 5%, and send rebate checks of $300 to individuals, $600 to married couples, who paid state income taxes. It would also have eliminated taxes on tips and overtime. Do you think the state legislature (should have passed the bill), or (should it have defeated the bill)?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Support for the bill was also strongly positive across all geographic regions of the state, as shown in Table 3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>3<\/strong><strong>: Pass or defeat budget surplus bill<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Region<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Pass or defeat<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Should have passed the bill<\/td><td>Should have defeated the bill<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>80<\/td><td>11<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Milwaukee city<\/td><td>88<\/td><td>9<\/td><td>2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Rest of Milwaukee media market<\/td><td>77<\/td><td>11<\/td><td>12<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Madison media market<\/td><td>78<\/td><td>13<\/td><td>8<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Green Bay\/Appleton media market<\/td><td>81<\/td><td>15<\/td><td>4<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>North and west media markets<\/td><td>80<\/td><td>8<\/td><td>12<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: On May 11, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republican legislative leaders announced an agreement on a bill that would have used $1.8 billion of the projected $2.5 billion state budget surplus to increase funding for special education, reduce school property taxes by about 5%, and send rebate checks of $300 to individuals, $600 to married couples, who paid state income taxes. It would also have eliminated taxes on tips and overtime. Do you think the state legislature (should have passed the bill), or (should it have defeated the bill)?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Fiscal issues<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Opponents of the surplus bill during the legislative process pointed to the potential fiscal consequences of spending a projected surplus now, when the state\u2019s financial situation remains uncertain for next year\u2019s budget. A second question in the Marquette poll included this fiscal concern and asked whether the respondent thought the bill should be delayed until next year or if it would be better to pass the bill now. With this concern mentioned, 69% say it would be better to provide the spending, rebates, and school aid now, while 21% say it would be better to delay this until next year and 9% say they don\u2019t know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Partisan differences are slight with this question, with more than two-thirds each of Republicans, independents, and Democrats in favor of passing the surplus bill now rather than waiting, as shown in Table 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>4<\/strong><strong>: Pass budget surplus bill now or wait until next year, by party identification<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Party ID<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Pass now or wait<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Better to delay special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks until next year<\/td><td>Better to provide special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks now<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>69<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican<\/td><td>24<\/td><td>68<\/td><td>8<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Independent<\/td><td>22<\/td><td>67<\/td><td>11<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democrat<\/td><td>18<\/td><td>74<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: Some have argued that the bill was fiscally irresponsible for spending a projected surplus now that might lead to a deficit in future budgets. Would it be better to delay providing special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks until next year, or would it be better to provide them now, even if it might affect the budget next year?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Moderates are most in favor of passage of the surplus bill now, 78%, with smaller majorities of conservatives, 63%, and liberals, 71%, in favor of this also, as shown in Table 5.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>5<\/strong><strong>: Pass budget surplus bill now or wait until next year, by ideology<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Ideology<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Pass now or wait<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Better to delay special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks until next year<\/td><td>Better to provide special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks now<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>69<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Conservative<\/td><td>27<\/td><td>63<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Moderate<\/td><td>15<\/td><td>78<\/td><td>8<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Liberal<\/td><td>19<\/td><td>71<\/td><td>10<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: Some have argued that the bill was fiscally irresponsible for spending a projected surplus now that might lead to a deficit in future budgets. Would it be better to delay providing special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks until next year, or would it be better to provide them now, even if it might affect the budget next year?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Respondents favor action on the surplus bill this year across all regions, including both the Madison media market, a heavily Democratic part of the state, and the north and west of the state, a solidly Republican area. These results are shown in Table 6.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>6<\/strong><strong>: Pass budget surplus bill now or wait until next year, by region<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Region<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Pass now or wait<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Better to delay special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks until next year<\/td><td>Better to provide special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks now<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>69<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Milwaukee city<\/td><td>12<\/td><td>78<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Rest of Milwaukee media market<\/td><td>20<\/td><td>69<\/td><td>11<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Madison media market<\/td><td>27<\/td><td>64<\/td><td>9<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Green Bay\/Appleton media market<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>67<\/td><td>11<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>North and west media markets<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>73<\/td><td>6<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: Some have argued that the bill was fiscally irresponsible for spending a projected surplus now that might lead to a deficit in future budgets. Would it be better to delay providing special education funding, property tax reductions, and rebate checks until next year, or would it be better to provide them now, even if it might affect the budget next year?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Reaction to candidate positions on the surplus bill<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Respondents were given a reminder of the positions the legislative parties, gubernatorial candidates, and Evers took on the surplus bill, including this statement:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The bill was defeated in the state Senate on May 13, with all 15 Democratic senators and 3 Republicans voting against the bill, versus 15 Republicans voting for it. The bill was also opposed by Republican candidate for governor Tom Tiffany and most of the Democratic candidates for governor.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Respondents were then asked about the positions of the Democratic candidates, Tiffany, and Evers on the surplus bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fewer than 20% say the opposition from the gubernatorial candidates was the right thing for them to do, with a slight majority saying it was the wrong thing to do, while just under 30% say they don\u2019t know if these positions were right or wrong. In contrast, 65% say Evers\u2019 support for the bill was the right thing to do, with 15% saying it was the wrong thing and 20% saying they don\u2019t know. The results for each of these political figures are shown in Table 7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>7<\/strong><strong>: Right or wrong position on the budget surplus bill<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Political figure<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Right or wrong position<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>It was the right thing for (them\/him) to do<\/td><td>It was the wrong thing for (them\/him) to do<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Democratic candidates for governor opposing<\/td><td>19<\/td><td>54<\/td><td>27<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican candidate for governor Tom Tiffany opposing<\/td><td>18<\/td><td>53<\/td><td>29<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democratic Gov. Tony Evers supporting<\/td><td>65<\/td><td>15<\/td><td>20<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: How do you feel about (Democratic candidates for governor opposing) (Republican candidate for governor Tom Tiffany opposing) (Democratic Gov. Tony Evers supporting) the bill?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite ordinary partisan affinity, knowing the positions of political leaders for or against the bill did not bring rank-and-file partisans into alignment with any of their party\u2019s leaders who opposed the bill. Rather, for example, regardless of party, 59% or more of each group said Evers did the right thing in supporting the bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The substantial \u201cdon\u2019t know\u201d rate suggests discomfort among respondents when the positions of their own party\u2019s&nbsp; political figures conflict with the respondents\u2019 policy preferences.&nbsp; At the same time, the impact of partisanship is rather limited. Fewer than 30% of any partisan group says the opposition from Democratic gubernatorial candidates or from Tiffany was the right thing for them or him to do, while 48% to 59% of each partisan camp say opposition was the wrong position for both Democratic candidates and for Tiffany. \u201cDon\u2019t know\u201d rates range from 20% to 32% across partisan groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the case of Evers\u2019 support for the bill, 59% of Republicans, 60% of independents, and 76% of Democrats say Evers did the right thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These comparisons are shown in Table 8.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>8<\/strong><strong>: Political figures\u2019 positions on budget surplus bill, by party identification<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Party ID<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"3\"><strong>Right or wrong position<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>It was the right thing for (them\/him) to do<\/td><td>It was the wrong thing for (them\/him) to do<\/td><td>Don\u2019t know<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Democratic candidates for governor opposing<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>59<\/td><td>20<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Independent<\/td><td>19<\/td><td>52<\/td><td>29<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democrat<\/td><td>17<\/td><td>51<\/td><td>32<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Republican candidate for governor Tom Tiffany opposing<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican<\/td><td>28<\/td><td>48<\/td><td>25<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Independent<\/td><td>15<\/td><td>55<\/td><td>30<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democrat<\/td><td>12<\/td><td>57<\/td><td>31<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Democratic Gov. Tony Evers supporting<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican<\/td><td>59<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>20<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Independent<\/td><td>60<\/td><td>13<\/td><td>28<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democrat<\/td><td>76<\/td><td>11<\/td><td>12<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin surveys, latest: May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Question: How do you feel about (Democratic candidates for governor opposing) (Republican candidate for governor Tom Tiffany opposing) (Democratic Gov. Tony Evers supporting) the bill?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Will positions on the bill matter in November\u2019s election?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Twenty-five percent of adults say candidate positions on the surplus bill will be very important for their vote in November for governor and the legislature. Another 48% say it will be somewhat important, while 21% say it is not too important and 6% say not at all important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Those who favored passage of the surplus bill are slightly more likely to say the bill will be very important for their vote, 28%, compared to those who opposed the bill, 20%. There is little partisan gap in importance of positions on the bill for the upcoming elections, as shown in Table 9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Table <\/strong><strong>9<\/strong><strong>: Importance of budget surplus bill for November vote, by party identification<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Among adults<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><td rowspan=\"2\"><strong>Party ID<\/strong><\/td><td colspan=\"4\"><strong>Importance for Nov. vote<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Very important<\/td><td>Somewhat important<\/td><td>Not too important<\/td><td>Not at all important<\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Among all adults<\/td><td>25<\/td><td>48<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>6<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Republican<\/td><td>23<\/td><td>50<\/td><td>17<\/td><td>10<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Independent<\/td><td>27<\/td><td>46<\/td><td>21<\/td><td>6<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Democrat<\/td><td>25<\/td><td>47<\/td><td>26<\/td><td>2<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"5\">Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, May 20-21, 2026<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"5\">Question: How important are the positions taken by candidates on this bill for your vote in November for governor and for state legislature?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>About the Marquette Law School Poll<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Marquette Law School Poll is the most extensive statewide polling project in Wisconsin history. The survey was conducted May 20-21, 2026, interviewing 454 Wisconsin adults, with a margin of error of +\/-5.5 percentage points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The survey was conducted with a sample selected from the SSRS Opinion Panel, a probability sample drawn from postal addresses across the state and invited to take part in surveys online. The interview was conducted online with all respondents. Full details of the methodology are contained in the methodology statement at the link below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The partisan makeup of the sample is 33% Republican, 31% Democratic, and 36% independent. In all polls conducted in 2025 and 2026, the combined samples were 36% Republican, 32% Democratic, and 32% independent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The entire questionnaire, methodology statement, full results, and breakdowns by demographic groups are available on the <a href=\"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/category\/results-and-data\/\">Marquette Law School website<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Also: Please note: Complete Poll results and methodology information can be found online at law.marquette.edu\/poll MILWAUKEE \u2014 A new Marquette Law School Poll finds 80% of Wisconsin adults say the legislature should have passed a proposed bill using the projected state budget surplus to reduce property taxes, increase special education funding, and provide rebates to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"","ocean_second_sidebar":"","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"","ocean_custom_header_template":"","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[19],"class_list":["post-3444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-poll-release","tag-poll-release","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3444"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3445,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3444\/revisions\/3445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.marquette.edu\/poll\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}