Celebrating Our Recent PILS Summer Fellows—Outreach Work in Florida

This is the second part of a series celebrating our recent PILS summer fellows through some representative examples—and, hopefully, pointing toward future public interest minded work. In the first entry, Andrea Bishop reflected on their work with the Eviction Defense Project. Today, Mia Stevenson, who spent the past summer at Coast to Coast Legal Aid Society of South Florida, reflects on the importance of legal aid organizations reaching out to the community to describe and explain the work they are doing.

Mia StevensonBy Mia Stevenson, 2L

As a Marquette Law School Public Interest Law Society Fellow, I spent my summer at Coast to Coast Legal Aid Society of South Florida, where I observed the important role that presence in the community plays for legal aid providers.

Attorneys, paralegals, and interns attend outreach events, including community presentations, clinics, and events such as backpack giveaways and resource fairs. I had the privilege of attending Fort Lauderdale FLITE Center’s resource fair, where we provided those in attendance with information about the presence of Coast to Coast Legal Aid of South Florida and the free civil legal services itprovides. Although some of these outreach events are directly tied to providing legal information, many also emphasize giving back to the community, which is just as important and is among the values of legal aid providers.

The lack of access by everyday Americans to legal assistance and the justice system is why it is important for legal aid services to be visible in the community. Legal aid providers provide access to a wide variety of populations, including victims of domestic violence, rural populations, veterans, and people who have been wrongfully evicted. If, however, the community is unaware of the presence of the legal aid providers, then it is more difficult for them to seek out and receive the help that they need.

Additionally, in underserved communities there is a large group of people who are unaware that some of the issues that they face could be resolved or mitigated with the help of an attorney. Community outreach events allow legal aid providers to interact with community members and explain the services that can be provided and how they can help. Community outreach as a form of service – though it can easily be underappreciated – is incredibly valuable to the people we serve.

Continue ReadingCelebrating Our Recent PILS Summer Fellows—Outreach Work in Florida

Celebrating Our Recent PILS Summer Fellows—and Looking Forward to 2025

Marquette University Law School and its surrounding communities are fortunate to have students dedicated to making a positive impact, as well as the strong support of those who help them in their efforts. As we look forward to a new group of Public Interest Law Society (PILS) fellows for this summer, we are sharing this week a series of reflections by Marquette law students on their experiences as Public Interest Law Society fellows during the past summer.

These reflections offer insight into how hands-on advocacy not only affects the communities served but also shapes the professional identities of future attorneys.

Public interest legal work requires working with people through challenging times. Our PILS fellows provide critical services to underserved populations and confront the challenge of justice—or injustice—in people’s lives.

This series of stories provides an opportunity to reflect on the formative power of this work.

We begin with Andrea Bishop (2L), who worked with Legal Action of Wisconsin’s Eviction Defense Project, providing legal representation to tenants facing housing instability. Her story reveals how critical access to representation is in addressing inequities in housing and creating stability for vulnerable individuals and communities.

By Andrea Bishop, 2L

Andrea BishopAt least twice a week this past summer, I worked with a tenant who, like dozens of others present in the Milwaukee County Courthouse, was moments away from losing their home—until we stepped in. This is the difference that adequate counsel can play in a person’s life.

I worked for and have continued to volunteer with Legal Action of Wisconsin’s Eviction Defense Project. Focusing on providing same-day limited scope legal representation to tenants facing eviction court, the Eviction Defense Project has been instrumental in changing the lives of hundreds of individuals.

Because civil defendants do not have a constitutional right to counsel, most Milwaukee tenants go unrepresented in eviction proceedings. The National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel reported that only 2% of Milwaukee tenants receive legal representation. But 76% of those represented successfully prevent eviction, according to the Stout report on Eviction Free MKE. Representation matters.

When tenants have access to counsel, they are given support that can make the difference in the ability to maintain jobs, schooling, and even health. In Milwaukee County, eviction court cases and judgments disproportionally affect individuals of color, exacerbating the already pressing issues of poverty and housing instability. Most Milwaukee landlords will outright deny rental applications from individuals with eviction cases on their records, even if the judgment has been paid in full or the case dismissed. Those that accept them tend to charge double or triple the security deposit to provide collateral to mitigate the risk of renting to tenants with prior evictions. These increased costs result in limited housing options for individuals suffering from financial difficulties, who are often left living in housing with severe conditions issues.

Many tenants at risk of eviction do not report unsafe conditions to Milwaukee’s Department of Neighborhood Services (DNS) for fear their housing will be deemed uninhabitable. This would force them to lose their housing, often without warning or preparation. Even when tenants do request inspections, DNS can refuse them and regularly does so when eviction proceedings are in motion.

Tenants who have had an eviction granted against them may lose housing benefits that are a critical component of their ability to maintain safe and secure housing. While tenants can reapply for benefits through the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee (HACM), it is a process which involves multiple forms and a lottery system. There is not enough availability of these sought after housing vouchers—HACM closed its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Public Housing waiting lists on August 1, 2024—and individuals who qualify have now missed their chance at affordable housing.

Milwaukee’s housing instability crisis requires all of us—lawmakers, landlords, and community members—to work together toward systemic change. The work of the Eviction Defense Project is just the beginning, and there is more to be done to ensure everyone has a safe and secure home. I am glad for the opportunity to contribute to this work.

Continue ReadingCelebrating Our Recent PILS Summer Fellows—and Looking Forward to 2025

Law Student and PILS Fellow Morgan Kaplan Describes the “Steps” Required of a Pro Se “Movant” in Family Court in Milwaukee County

Milwaukee County CourthouseEarly this semester, I had the privilege of meeting with Marquette law students who this past summer held Public Interest Law Society fellowships. These 25 individuals worked at organizations, geographically from Wisconsin to Chicago to Washington, D.C., with a variety of focuses—including public defender offices, legal services organizations, prosecutor’s offices, government agencies, and civil rights entities, scarcely to exhaust the list.

I learned so much from the conversation, arranged by Angela F. Schultz, assistant dean for public service at the Law School. Much of it would be worth relating, and I encourage everyone in our law school community to converse with one or more of our impressive PILS fellows.

In this post, with thanks to (and permission from) Morgan Kaplan, a second-year student, I want to highlight briefly one phenomenon that she observed this summer as a PILS fellow working at the Milwaukee Justice Center. More specifically, she described for the group some of the difficulties faced by pro se litigants hoping to modify family court orders in the Milwaukee County Circuit Court.

Here is the description, which I asked her to write up:

One might hope that filing a motion to modify a family court order would be a relatively straightforward proposition—perhaps even that a party could bring in the completed paperwork, drop it off (file it) in one place, and move on to preparing for the court date or other tasks.

This is not the case. Rather than a simplified process that promotes access to the civil justice system, pro se litigants must navigate a sea of forms and offices, even after they have filled out the modification form (the motion). The Milwaukee Justice Center has prepared a sort of map—a checklist—to guide their journey. Let’s travel with them.

1. Those who are eligible for a fee waiver, either based on income or receipt of public benefits, will start in Room 104, the Clerk of Court’s office, to have their fee waiver notarized.

2. That’s just notarization: Having the fee waiver approved requires a trip up to the Chief Judge’s office in Room 609. Once those interested have an approved fee waiver, then they can move on to the next steps to file the motion.

3. It’s time for filing. This happens in Room 104, the Clerk of Court’s office (a second time for those using a fee waiver). There, interested parties will either show their fee waiver or pay a filing fee, giving the original documents to the clerk. We may now call them “movants.”

4. Then they will move upstairs (a second time for those with a fee waiver)—all the way to Room 707—to visit the office of the Family Court Commissioner. There, movants will hand all remaining copies of the motion to the calendar desk and get a hearing date, which will be stamped on all copies of the motion.

5. If the desired modification—the relief requested by the motion—involves a child support order, movants will head back down to Room 101, the Milwaukee County Child Support Office, to drop off a copy of the motion there as well.

6. After those three stops (five, in fact, for those with a fee waiver), movants will head over to the Safety Building, Room 102 (connected to the courthouse via skywalk), to fill out paperwork in hopes of having the Milwaukee County Sheriff serve the other party (if a county resident) with a final copy of the motion.

We all know that the processes of our civil justice system were not created with unrepresented litigants in mind, yet no one doubts that cases with such pro se litigants, in fact, predominate in family courts across the country. We may well ask whether we have taken enough steps to facilitate access to justice for these pro se litigants.

Continue ReadingLaw Student and PILS Fellow Morgan Kaplan Describes the “Steps” Required of a Pro Se “Movant” in Family Court in Milwaukee County