Athletes Behaving Badly

Did Michael Vick get off easy when he was reinstated by the NFL?  Or would the League overstep its proper role in imposing further punishment on an athlete who has already paid his proverbial debt to society?  Variations on these questions arise every time a famous professional athlete breaks the law — an all-too-common occurence, it seems.  

Janie Kim and Matt Parlow make a thoughtful contribution to the debate with a new paper on SSRN entitled “Off-Court Misbehavior: Sports Leagues and Private Punishment.”  Here is the abstract:

This Essay examines how professional sports leagues address (apparently increasing) criminal activity by players off of the field or court. It analyzes the power of professional sports leagues and, in particular, the commissioners of those leagues, to discipline wayward athletes. Such discipline is often met with great controversy — from players’ unions and commentators alike — especially when a commissioner invokes the “in the best interest of the sport” clause of the professional sports league’s constitution and bylaws. The Essay then contextualizes such league discipline in criminal punishment theory — juxtaposing punishment norms in public law with incentives and rationales for discipline in professional sports — and analyzes the legal and cultural limitations to this approach.

As Kim and Parlow point out, one of the troubling aspects of league-administered punishment for off-court misconduct is that the procedures and standards seem so informal and ad hoc compared with those of the criminal justice system.  This raises legitimacy problems for league punishment — all the more so when the league itself is perceived to have unclean hands (see, e.g., MLB and steroids).

Continue ReadingAthletes Behaving Badly

Restorative Justice and the Big Tent

tentI have a new paper on SSRN discussing some of the pitfalls that the restorative justice movement may encounter.  The paper responds to Professor Erik Luna’s essay “In Support of Restorative Justice.” Luna extolls the capacity of restorative justice practices to accommodate diverse theories of punishment, but I argue that such a “big tent” approach may undermine the ability of the restorative justice movement to bring meaningful reform to the American system of mass incarceration. This comment was published along with Luna’s essay and additional responses in Criminal Law Conversations (Paul H. Robinson et al. eds., 2009).

Continue ReadingRestorative Justice and the Big Tent

Seventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Experience and Confidence Count

seventh-circuit51Once a person comes under police suspicion for dealing drugs, does that person retain any constitutionally protected right to privacy in his own home?  Of course, the answer is “not much” if the police have some specific reason to believe that the house has been used for storing or selling drugs.  But what if the police have only general information that the home-owner is dealing drugs, without any specific information connecting the house to drug trafficking?  Even then, the Seventh Circuit indicated last week, the police may have probable cause to search the house for evidence of drug transactions.

John Orozco was convicted of drug and gun offenses based, in part, on evidence found in his home while police executed a search warrant.  On appeal, he argued that the evidence should have been suppressed because the warrant was issued without probable cause. 

Continue ReadingSeventh Circuit Criminal Case of the Week: Experience and Confidence Count