Grossman on Governance

wall-streetNadelle Grossman has two new corporate law papers on SSRN.  The first, entitled “Turning a Short-Term Fling into a Long-Term Commitment: Board Duties in a New Era,” deals with the timely topic of corporate leaders making strategic decisions based on short-term profits without regard to long-term risk.  As a solution, she proposes changes in the legal duties owed by corporate directors.  Here is the abstract:

Corporate boards face significant pressure to make decisions that maximize profits in the short run. That pressure comes in part from executives who are financially rewarded for short-term profits despite the long-term risks associated with those profit-making activities. The current financial crisis, where executives at AIG and numerous other institutions ignored the long-term risks associated with their mortgage-backed securities investments, arose largely because those executives were compensated for the short-term profits generated by those investments despite their longer-term risks. Pressure on boards for short-term profits also comes from activist investors who seek to make quick money off of trading in stocks whose prices overly reflect short-term firm values.

Yet this excessive focus on producing short-term profits runs counter to the interests of non-short-termist investors and other corporate constituents, as well as our economy and society as a whole, in creating corporate enterprises that are profitable on an enduring basis. Once again, the current financial crisis provides a lens through which we can see the distressing impact — both to individual businesses as well as to the entire U.S community — of an excessive focus on short-term profits.

I propose a solution to address this problem of short-termism. Under my proposal, directors would be required to make decisions that are in the long-term best interest of stockholders and the corporation under their fiduciary duties. I explain in the article why I propose fixing the short-termism problem through fiduciary duties as well as how, practically, my proposal would be implemented.

This paper is forthcoming in the Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Continue ReadingGrossman on Governance

Debate Over the Proposed New Restatement of Employment Law

The Wisconsin Law Journal has an interesting article on the new draft of the Restatement of Employment Law.  As the article discusses, there has been a lot of debate within the employment law community about some aspects of the draft.  Indeed, a group comprised mostly of employment law professors has prepared extensive critical commentary on the draft Restatement.  Our own Paul Secunda co-chaired the working group critiquing the provisions on wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.  The report of his working group is now available on SSRN.

Continue ReadingDebate Over the Proposed New Restatement of Employment Law

New Issue of Marquette Law Review

The Summer 2009 issue of the Marquette Law Review (vol. 92, no. 4) is now available on-line.  Congratulations to the editors of Volume 92 for a job well done.  Here are the contents of the new issue, with individual links to each article:

BARROCK LECTURE

THE LEGITIMACY OF POLICE AMONG YOUNG AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEN
Tracey Meares

HALLOWS LECTURE

BEYOND DECISIONAL TEMPLATES: THE ROLE OF IMAGINATIVE JUSTICE IN THE TRIAL COURT
The Honorable Sarah Evans Barker

ARTICLES

DRAINING THE MORASS: ENDING THE JURISPRUDENTIALLY UNSOUND UNPUBLICATION SYSTEM
David R. Cleveland

THE DISAPPOINTED EXPECTATIONS TEST AND THE ECONOMIC LOSS DOCTRINE
Ralph C. Anzivino

INFORMATIONAL BLACKMAIL: SURVIVED BY TECHNICALITY?
Chen Yehudai

COMMENT

“SLICING A SHADOW”: THE DEBATE OVER COMBINED REPORTING AND ITS EFFECT ON WISCONSIN’S BUSINESS CLIMATE
Staci Flinchbaugh

NOTE

JAMIE S. V. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: URBAN CHALLENGES CAUSE SYSTEMIC VIOLATIONS OF THE IDEA
Amy L. MacArdy

SPEECH

LAW REVIEW ANNUAL BANQUET: THE JOY OF LAW
The Honorable William C. Griesbach

Continue ReadingNew Issue of Marquette Law Review