Diminishing the Harmful Effects of “Cultural Cognition” in Labor and Employment Litigation

Our recent past Boden Lecturer Dan Kahan and his colleagues have developed a provocative body of empirical and theoretical scholarship on “cultural cognition” (see, e.g., his article here in the Marquette Law Review). Kahan’s basic thesis is that judges and other legal decisionmakers tend to perceive facts in ways that are congenial to their social values. This is not a conspiracy theory – Kahan’s claim is not that judges intentionally manipulate the facts in order to reach desired results, but that their values shape their perceptions in subtle, unconscious ways.

Paul Secunda has been exploring the implications of cultural cognition theory for law and employment law. An initial foray is here, and the latest entry in the series is here. The new paper is entitled “Psychological Realism in Labor and Employment Law.”

Paul is concerned that culturally driven fact-finding may undercut the perceived legitimacy of the courts. In the new paper, he suggests a variety of potential reforms for further consideration that might address the cultural cognition and legitimacy concerns. Among the more provocative is a proposal for specialized employment-law courts or judges, analogous to our specialized bankruptcy courts.

The abstract of the new paper appears after the jump.

Continue ReadingDiminishing the Harmful Effects of “Cultural Cognition” in Labor and Employment Litigation

Ail to the Chief

The dark underside of life tenure for Supreme Court Justices is the difficulty of removing an obviously ailing Justice even after his or her capacity to serve has seriously deteriorated.  However, despite the absence of effective formal removal mechanisms, Chief Justices have sometimes been successful in nudging declining Associate Justices off the bench, as in the cases of Justices Holmes and Douglas.  But what is to be done if it is the Chief who can no longer serve?

That is the question explored in a new paper on SSRN by Chad Oldfather and Todd Peppers.  Although other scholars have grappled with the general problem of disability on the Supreme Court, Oldfather and Peppers identify two reasons why the problem is especially acute when it comes to the Chief.  First, it is much more common for Chief Justices than Associate Justices to serve until the time of death or a major disability.  Only four of the past sixteen Chief Justices have retired while in good health.  (Oldfather and Peppers use the decline and passing of the late William Rehnquist as a case study of the more typical pattern for Chief Justices.)  Second, the Chief is not merely one of nine adjudicators on the Court, but also serves as the administrative head of the entire federal judiciary.  For that reason, the incapacitation of the Chief Justice may do much more damage than the incapacitation of an Associate.

Oldfather and Peppers do not advocate for a particular solution, but they do urge consideration of various potential reforms, such as the imposition of a term limit on the Chief Justice.

Entitled “Till Death Do Us Part: Chief Justices and the United States Supreme Court,” their paper will be published in the Marquette Law Review.

Continue ReadingAil to the Chief

How to Hold Onto Your Sports Franchise

The Oklahoma City Thunder had a nice run in the recently concluded NBA playoffs, but it was nothing compared to their run from Seattle.  The story of the escape of the former SuperSonics from Seattle is the central case study in a new paper on the retention of major league franchises by Paul Anderson and William S. Miller.  

Anderson and Miller point to the sports facililty lease agreement as the key legal document by which communities attempt to secure long-term commitments from their teams.  However, as the City of Seattle discovered, there are significant legal and practical impediments to enforcing these commitments.  It may be especially difficult to obtain the remedy of specific performance, i.e., a court order requiring a recalcitrant team to continue playing in a city it wishes to desert.

Anderson and Miller helpfully survey a range of non-relocation agreements that have been negotiated between different cities and sports franchises.  They identify the agreement between Bexar County, Texas, and the San Antonio Spurs as a model of a strong agreement that seems much better designed than the Seattle contract to keep a franchise in its city over the long run.  Among other things, the contract includes a liquidated damages clause that starts at $250,000,000 and declines to $106,000,000 over the term of the lease.

Continue ReadingHow to Hold Onto Your Sports Franchise