Parties Ask for Stay in Tafas v. Doll
The parties in the Tafas v. Doll have filed a “Joint Consent Motion for a Stay of En Banc Proceedings.” As patent practitioners are painfully aware, Tafas stemmed from the USPTO’s August 21, 2007, new patent-prosecution rules and regulations. The “new regulations” challenged were Rules 75, 78, 114, and 265. Rule 75 established the number of claims that could be presented in an application without an accompanying examination support document. Rule 78 established the number of continuing applications that could be filed within a patent family. Rule 114 established the number of requests for continuations that could be filed within a patent family. Finally, Rule 265 set forth the requirements for an examination support document.
Tafas, later joined by GlaxoSmithKline, challenged the validity of the new regulations, and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginina granted summery judgment for him (and GSK), enjoining the USPTO from implementing and enforcing the new regulations. Much to the dismay of most patent practitioners, on appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part, that decision. The CAFC only agreed with the district court that Rule 78 was invalid and remanded the case to the district court for further consideration of the remaining issues. Then, on July 6, 2009, the CAFC granted Taffas and GSK’s petition for rehearing en banc.
Well, all of the parties involved now want to wait and see what will happen since David Kappos has been nominated as Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO. If Kappos is confirmed after his Senate Judiciary Committee nomination hearing, which is scheduled to begin tomorrow, July 29, 2009, then Kappos could moot the entire case by rescinding the rules at issue.
Accordingly, last Friday, July 24, 2009, in their Joint Consent Motion for a Stay of En Banc Proceedings, all of the parties in the case asked the court to stay all en banc proceedings, including briefing and oral arguments, until 60 days after Kappos’s confirmation. Hopefully, Kappos is confirmed; hopefully, he rescinds the new rules; and, hopefully, he does so quickly.
A couple of weeks ago Amazon remotely deleted two e-books off of its customers’ Kindle readers—and in one of those too-good-to-be-true moments, the books were “1984” and “Animal Farm” by George Orwell. 
We are used to the Recording Industry Association of America aggressively litigating against individuals and organizations, trying to impede copyright infringements of musical works through peer-to-peer networks and/or other file-sharing technologies. The original Napster was converted to a pay-based music subscription service years ago and, more recently, Kazaa did the same.