Just a Thank You

This semester, I am offering a new course in Election Law. It’s work in progress, but one of the things that I have tried to do is bring in speakers from the local political world to react to the material we have covered. So far, students have heard from Jim Troupis, a nationally renowned expert on redistricting and Madison based lawyer to Republicans, and Mike Tate, currently chair of the state Democratic Party and, even at what seems to me to be his impossibly young age, a very seasoned political operative with a strikingly broad range of experience , i.e., a pretty good example of a client for election  lawyers.

Both Mike and Jim were extraordinarily candid and I believe that what happens in Room 210 stays in Room 210.  So I will simply say that both enhanced our educational experience. The purpose of this post is simply to thank them and to let them know that their MULS pens are in the mail.

Continue ReadingJust a Thank You

Two Cheers for the Electoral College

George Soros is funding an effort to undermine the Electoral College. The idea is to enter into a compact with other states in which each state agrees to require their electors to vote for the candidate who has won the national popular vote. The compact would not become effective until states comprising a majority of electoral votes have agreed.

The effort has resulted in the introduction of AB 751 in the Wisconsin legislature.

The proposal may well be unconstitutional under the Compact Clause. It is almost certainly motivated by partisan concerns. It isn’t simply that Democrats tend to be more geographically concentrated. That can actually help if Democratic voters are packed in the right states. Thus, while Bush lost the popular election and won the electoral vote in ’00, Kerry almost did the same thing in ’04.

Rather, the back story is population trends that will move electoral votes to Republican states. For the first time in who can remember, California will not pick up a seat and the Midwest and Northeast continue to lose population to the south and southwest.

Republicans should not be too sanguine. Large influxes of people into a state can change its political composition. When I was a kid, California was a fairly Republican state. But there is, nevertheless, reason to suspect that the electoral map is going to get tougher for Democrats. 

Continue ReadingTwo Cheers for the Electoral College

A View of ADR as Part of the Process Instead of an Alternative to the Process

In law school I had the impression that Alternative Dispute Resolution was a practice area separate from litigation. Seemingly, there was a Chinese wall between the trial advocacy classes and ADR classes. After all, my ADR classes never discussed the techniques for cross-examinations, and my trial advocacy classes never discussed mediation or arbitration strategies.

The ABA Young Lawyer Division’s latest newsletter perpetuates that myth in an article entitled “Top Ten Mistakes Litigators Make in Arbitration.” Certainly, the article gives good advice in telling us what to avoid — serving excessive document requests, using delay tactics, not cooperating, not being prepared, introducing redundant testimony, and filing untimely submissions. However, that advice is equally applicable to litigation as it is to arbitration.

In my experience, the differences between litigation and arbitration are cosmetic. 

Continue ReadingA View of ADR as Part of the Process Instead of an Alternative to the Process