New Marquette Law School national survey finds public skeptical of tariffs and inflation trends, but increasingly positive on the nation’s direction

Large majority oppose Canada becoming 51st state and oppose abolishing Department of Education, while support for deportations remains strong

Also:

  • Public views Russia, China negatively; Canada, Ukraine positively
  • Trump job approval dips slightly since January, majorities disapprove of Musk
  • Disapproval of Democratic Party and Democrats in Congress has increased and is stronger than disapproval of Republicans
  • Partisan differences remain strong on almost every issue

MILWAUKEE – In the run up to threatened new tariffs, a new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds 58% of adults think tariffs hurt the U.S. economy, while 28% say tariffs help the economy and 14% say they don’t make much difference. Slightly more than half of Republicans, 52%, think tariffs help the economy, but 58% of independents say they hurt the economy, as do 89% of Democrats.

The public is increasingly skeptical of how the economy will fare, in terms of inflation, in response to President Donald Trump’s policies generally. A majority of adults, 58%, think Trump’s policies will increase inflation, 30% think his policies will decrease inflation, and 12% think they will have no effect on inflation. Among Republicans, 62% think the policies will decrease inflation, a decline from 70% in late January and from 76% in December. Only 16% of independents think inflation will decrease, compared to 26% in January and 28% in December. Ninety-two percent of Democrats say Trump’s policies will increase inflation, an increase from 85% who said that in January and 82% in December.

Trump’s national job approval declined slightly in this late March survey to 46%, with 54% disapproval. In January, 48% approved and 52% disapproved. Trump continues to enjoy high approval among Republicans, 87%, hardly changed from 89% in January. His approval has slipped somewhat among independents, to 32%, down from 37%. Approval among Democrats is 10% in March compared to 9% in January.

Approval of how Elon Musk is handling his work in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) stands at 41%, with disapproval at 58%. Musk’s personal favorability is 38%, with 60% unfavorable.

The survey was conducted March 17-27, 2025, interviewing 1,021 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.5 percentage points.

Across lines of race, education, and gender, more people think tariffs will hurt rather than help the economy. The sole exception is white, non-college-educated men, one of Trump’s strongest supporting groups with 67% reporting having voted for Trump in November. Among this core of Trump’s support, 44% say tariffs help the economy and 40% say they hurt the economy. Among all other categories of race, education, and gender, more think the economy will be hurt rather than helped, as shown in Table 1. Large majorities of college-educated white people of either sex and all categories of non-white people expect damage to the economy. A plurality of non-college white women agree, though a quarter don’t think there will be much of an effect.

Table 1: Effect of tariffs on the economy, by race, education and gender

Among adults

 Effect of tariffs
Race, education, genderHelps U.S. economyHurts U.S. economyDoesn’t make much difference
Among all adults285814
white non-college male444016
white non-college female334225
white college male246116
white college female23725
Non-white non-college male28684
Non-white non-college female186022
Non-white college male147610
Non-white college female20728
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: In general, do you think imposing tariffs or fees on products imported from other countries helps the U.S. economy, hurts the economy, or doesn’t make much of a difference either way?

Expectations about inflation are similar, with half of white, non-college-educated males thinking inflation will go down due to Trump’s policies, while a plurality of white, non-college-educated females and a majority of all other categories expect his policies to increase inflation, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Effect of Trump policies on inflation, by race, education, and gender

Among adults

 Policies’ effect on inflation
Race, education, genderDecrease inflationIncrease inflationHave no effect on inflation
Among all adults305812
white non-college male503812
white non-college female354619
white college male275814
white college female26704
Non-white non-college male315811
Non-white non-college female167410
Non-white college male117117
Non-white college female23743
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: Do you think Trump’s policy proposals will decrease inflation, increase inflation, or have no effect on inflation?

Other policies and executive orders

A substantial majority (65%) of adults believe that the number of immigrants crossing the southern border has decreased since December, with 30% saying crossings are about the same and 5% saying border crossings have gone up.

A substantial majority (68%) favor deportation of immigrants who are in the United States illegally, an increase from 60% in January. Thirty-two percent are opposed.

When asked about deporting those immigrants in the United States illegally who have been in the country for a number of years and have jobs and no criminal record, support for deportation falls to 41% and opposition rises to 59%, slightly changed from January when 43% favored and 57% opposed deportation of this group.

A substantial majority (64%) say that freezing spending or closing agencies that have been authorized by Congress is beyond the president’s powers, while 36% say the president does have this authority. Within the Republican party, 38% say this is beyond the president’s authority and 62% say he has this power. Among independents, 64% say this is beyond the president’s power, as do 90% of Democrats.

Sixty-five percent oppose abolishing the Department of Education, with 35% in favor. Sixty-seven percent of Republicans favor closing the department, with 33% opposed. A large majority (77%) of independents oppose abolishing the department, with 23% in favor. Among Democrats, 93% oppose closing the department, with 7% in favor.

The public is evenly divided on ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the federal government, with 50% in favor and 50% opposed. Republicans strongly support ending these policies, 80%, while 43% of independents and 22% of Democrats also favor ending DEI programs. A small majority of white adults favor ending DEI programs, while small to substantial majorities of non-white groups are opposed, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Ending DEI, by race and ethnicity

Among adults

Race and ethnicityEnd DEI
FavorOppose
Among all adults5050
White5445
Black3763
Hispanic4753
Other/Multiple4159
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: Do you favor or oppose ending diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs in the federal government?

Trump’s executive order making English the official language of the United States is favored by 73% of adults, including 95% of Republicans, 74% of independents, and 50% of Democrats.

International affairs

In this nationwide survey, Trump’s call to make Canada the 51st state is favored by 25% and opposed by 75%. A substantial percentage, or more, of each partisan group opposes Canada’s merging into the United States, including 62% of Republicans, 73% of independents, and 90% of Democrats.

On Feb. 28, Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky held a contentious meeting at the White House. Sixty-four percent of those polled said they had heard or read a lot about that meeting, considerably more than the 38% who heard or read a lot about Trump’s speech to a joint session of Congress on March 4 or the 32% who heard a lot about Ukraine’s accepting Trump’s proposal for a 30-day cease fire on March 11.

Among all adults, 37% say the United States is giving too much support to Ukraine in its war against the Russian invasion, 33% say the United States is giving too little support, and 29% say the level of aid is about right.

  • A majority of Republicans (59%) say the United States is giving Ukraine too much support, with 11% saying too little and 30% about the right amount.
  • A plurality of independents (41%) say United States support is too much, with 27% saying not enough and 32% saying support is about right.
  • Democrats hold roughly the reverse of Republican opinion, with 14% saying too much, 59% too little, and 27% saying about the right amount of support.

Of those who heard or read a lot about the White House meeting between Trump and Zelensky, 39% say the United States is giving too little support, compared to 27% saying this among those who heard only a little about the meeting and 18% saying it among those who heard nothing at all about the meeting. The full results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Aid to Ukraine by heard about white House meeting

Among adults

Heard about WH meetingAid to Ukraine
Too much supportNot enough supportAbout the right amount of support
Among all adults373329
A lot333928
A little442729
Nothing at all461836
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: [A White House meeting between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky] Here are some recent topics in the news. How much have you heard or read about each of these?
Question: When it comes to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, do you think the United States is providing too much support to Ukraine, not enough support to Ukraine, or about the right amount of support to Ukraine?

Among all adults, 26% say that what happens in Ukraine matters a great deal to life in the United States, 45% say it matters some, 23% say not much, and 6% say it matters not at all. Republicans and independents are more likely to say the outcome in Ukraine matters not much or not at all, compared to half as many Democrats. Likewise, only 16% of Republicans say the outcome matters a great deal, while 22% of independents and 37% of Democrats say the same. The full results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Outcome in Ukraine matters, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDOutcome in Ukraine matters
A great dealSomeNot muchNot at all
Among all adults2645236
Republican1646326
Independent22412313
Democrat3746152
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: How much do you think what happens in the Russia-Ukraine conflict matters to life in the United States?

Zelensky is seen favorably by 45% and unfavorably by 39%, with 17% saying they haven’t heard enough about him. Those with a favorable opinion of Zelensky include 23% of Republicans, 28% of independents, and 72% of Democrats. He is seen unfavorably by 59% of Republicans, 39% of independents, and 18% of Democrats.

In contrast to Zelensky, a large majority (85%) of Americans have an unfavorable opinion of Russian President Vladimir Putin, with 7% holding a favorable view. Republicans are only slightly more positive to Putin than are adults overall, with 10% favorable and 82% unfavorable. Independents are slightly more positive, 12% favorable and 74% unfavorable, with 14% saying they haven’t heard enough. Democrats are overwhelmingly unfavorable to Putin (92%).

Americans have a substantially more positive view of Ukraine than of Zelensky, with 59% favorable to the country and 31% unfavorable. Views of Russia are more similar to views of Putin, with 9% viewing Russia favorably and 83% unfavorably. While a majority of Republicans view Zelensky unfavorably, they are more evenly split on Ukraine, with 44% favorable and 45% unfavorable. In the cases of both Russia and Putin, more than 70% of each U.S. partisan group have unfavorable opinions of both country and leader.

A substantial majority (64%) of adults say the United States will be better off if it takes an active part in world affairs, while 36% say the country should stay out of world affairs. The percentage favoring an active role has increased in each partisan category since October 2024, during the Biden presidency. In October, 49% of Republicans chose an active role in the world, compared to 58% in March. Among independents, in October, 34% said an active role, while in March 48% said the same. For Democrats, those saying the United States should play an active role rose from 64% in October to 75% in March.

A cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy since World War II is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Among all adults, 56% have a favorable view of NATO, 27% unfavorable, and 17% say they haven’t heard enough. A plurality, but not a majority, of both Republicans (45%) and independents (43%) have favorable views of NATO, while a large majority (72%) of Democrats view the alliance favorably. There are substantial percentages who say they haven’t heard enough, especially among independents, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Favorability to NATO, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDView of NATO
FavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enough
Among all adults562717
Republican453717
Independent432830
Democrat721612
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: [NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following organizations or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

As with Russia, views of China are quite unfavorable, and this is the case among each partisan group. Among all adults, 73% have an unfavorable opinion and 18% a favorable view. Those with an unfavorable opinion include 79% of Republicans, 67% of independents, and 69% of Democrats.

Americans have far more favorable views of Canada. 73%, with 20% unfavorable. There is some variation by party, with 60% favorable among Republicans, 63% among independents, and 89% among Democrats.

Opinion about Israel is evenly divided, with 43% favorable and 43% unfavorable and 14% saying they haven’t heard enough. There is a substantial partisan divide, with 65% of Republicans favorable, 29% of independents, and 26% of Democrats. A substantial majority (63%) of Democrats have an unfavorable view of Israel, as do 47% of independents. Independents are considerably more likely than Democrats or Republicans to lack an opinion. The full results are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Favorability to Israel by party identification

Among adults

Party IDView of Israel
FavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enough
Among all adults434314
Republican652114
Independent294723
Democrat266310
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: [Israel] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following countries or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

There is a substantial difference in views of Israel by age, with younger people more negative and older people more positive, as shown in Table 8. This gradient with age also persists within each partisan category.

Table 8: Favorability to Israel by age

Among adults

AgeView of Israel
FavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enough
Among all adults434314
18-29236215
30-44324621
45-59503416
60+59356
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, March 17-27, 2025
Question: [Israel] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following countries or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Those with and those without a college degree (“non-graduates”) have nearly identical favorability to Israel, 43% among college graduates and 44% among non-graduates. Unfavorable views are a bit higher among college grads, 47%, than among non-graduates, 40%, though more non-graduates lack an opinion, 16%, than do graduates, 9%.

Views of the parties

Approval of the way Republicans in Congress are handing their job stands at 45%, with disapproval at 55%. Approval of how Democrats in Congress are doing their job is substantially lower at 29%, with disapproval at 71%. Republican approval of Republicans in Congress is 87%, while approval among Democrats of the way congressional Democrats are handling their job is only 50%. Among independents, 28% approve of the job by congressional Republicans and 15% approve of the job by congressional Democrats. Partisans of both parties are equally negative about the other party’s members of Congress: 88% of Republicans disapprove of job by Democrats in Congress, and 90% of Democrats disapprove of that by congressional Republicans.

Favorability to the Democratic Party has declined from 46% in October to 35% in March, while the favorable rating of the Republican Party has increased from 42% in October to 46% in March. Favorability to the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement trails that of the Republican Party at 41%, up slightly from 39% in October.

Vaccinations and measles outbreak

A relatively modest 37% say they have heard or read a lot about a measles outbreak in Texas and New Mexico, with 43% who say they have heard a little and 20% who have heard nothing at all. Democrats are considerably more likely to have heard a lot, 49%, than are Republicans, 29%, or independents, 23%. Only 12% of Democrats have heard nothing at all about the outbreak, while 24% of Republicans and 33% of independents have heard nothing.

A large majority (87%) of adults say the benefits of childhood vaccinations for measles, mumps, and rubella outweigh the risks, while 13% say the risks outweigh the benefits.

Those with children under 18 at home are more skeptical of vaccines than those without children. Among those with children, 81% say the benefits outweigh the risks of vaccines, while for those without school-age children, 90% say the benefits are worth it. This pattern holds across age groups for those under 30, 30-44, and 45-59. In each group those with children are less confident that the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risks than are those without children.

Those who think the benefits outweigh the risks are almost twice as likely to have heard a lot about the measles outbreak than those who think the risks outweigh the benefits, by a margin of 39% to 21%.

Racism and antisemitism

Sixty-eight percent say racism is a very big or moderately big problem, while 32% say it is a small problem or no problem at all. This percentage has varied little across 11 national surveys since late 2022.

Opinion is evenly divided over whether discrimination against white people has become as big of a problem as discrimination against Black people and other minorities, with 51% saying that it is as big a problem and 49% disagreeing. As with views of racism, this perception has hardly changed over the past year. A majority of white people (60%) say discrimination against white people is as big a problem, while 76% of Black people disagree, as do 55% of Hispanics and 68% of people of other or multiple races.

Those who view antisemitism as a very big or moderately big problem in the United States make up 61%, while 39% say it is a small problem or not a problem at all. Unlike views of Israel, there are modest partisan differences in concern with antisemitism, with 59% of Republicans, 51% of independents, and 65% of Democrats saying it is a problem.

Direction of the country

The percentage saying the country is headed in the right direction has more than doubled since October, going from 20% in October to 42% in March. Those saying the country is off on the wrong track has declined from 80% in October to 58% in March. The recent trend is shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Direction of the country

Among adults

Poll datesDirection of country
Right directionWrong track
3/17-27/254258
1/27-2/6/253862
12/2-11/242575
10/1-10/242080
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: March 17-27, 2025
Question: Do you feel things in this country are generally going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track?

These changing views are heavily influenced by partisan perceptions which shifted dramatically following Trump’s election in November. The percentage of Republicans saying right direction jumped from 7% in October to 80% in March, while Democrats dropped from 33% in October to 11% in March. Independents became somewhat more positive about the direction of the country, rising from 14% saying right direction in October to 25% in March. The full trend by party is shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Direction of the country, by party identification

Among adults

Poll datesDirection of country
Right directionWrong track
Republican
3/17-27/258020
1/27-2/6/257624
12/2-11/242278
10/1-10/24793
Independent
3/17-27/252575
1/27-2/6/252080
12/2-11/242773
10/1-10/241486
Democrat
3/17-27/251189
1/27-2/6/25793
12/2-11/242971
10/1-10/243367
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: March 17-27, 2025
Question: Do you feel things in this country are generally going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track?

Economic conditions

The share of adults saying the economy is poor has declined over the last several months, from 31% in October to 20% in March. But the percentage saying the economy is excellent or good has only slightly increased, rising from 24% in October to 26% in March. Most of the reduction in those saying the economy is poor was absorbed by those saying the economy is “not so good,” which is now 53%—up from 45% in October. The full trend is shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Views of the national economy

Among adults

Poll datesNational economy
Excellent/GoodNot so goodPoor
3/17-27/25265320
1/27-2/6/25275815
12/2-11/24295021
10/1-10/24244531
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: March 17-27, 2025
Question: How would you describe the state of the nation’s economy these days?

The economy is seen through profound partisan lenses. Republicans now see a far better economy than they did in October when Joe Biden was president. Likewise, Democrats have become more negative about the economy with Trump as president. Independents became less negative from October to December but have changed little since then. Table 12 shows the trends by partisanship.

Table 12: Views of the national economy, by party identification

Among adults

Poll datesNational economy
Excellent/GoodNot so goodPoor
Republican
3/17-27/2545469
1/27-2/6/25276310
12/2-11/24115732
10/1-10/2484744
Independent
3/17-27/25155629
1/27-2/6/25166024
12/2-11/24205525
10/1-10/24183844
Democrat
3/17-27/25126028
1/27-2/6/25335116
12/2-11/2451418
10/1-10/24414415
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: March 17-27, 2025
Question: How would you describe the state of the nation’s economy these days?

Family finances

Looking to the financial situation within the home, the percentage saying they are struggling has declined from 23% in October to 15% in March. Those saying they are just getting by rose from 43% to 47%, and those reporting living comfortably increased from 34% to 38%. The full results are shown in Table 13.

Table 13: Family financial situation

Among adults

Poll datesFamily financial situation
Living comfortablyJust getting byStruggling
3/17-27/25384715
1/27-2/6/25364817
12/2-11/24354420
10/1-10/24344323
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: March 17-27, 2025
Question: Thinking about your family’s financial situation, would you say you are living comfortably, just getting by, or struggling to make ends meet?

Republicans’ views of their family finances improved considerably from October to March, while independents improved a little and Democrats became a bit less likely to say they were struggling. The trend within party is shown in Table 14.

Table 14: Family financial situation, by party identification

Among adults

Poll datesFamily financial situation
Living comfortablyJust getting byStruggling
Republican
3/17-27/25444313
1/27-2/6/25374617
12/2-11/24304525
10/1-10/24334225
Independent
3/17-27/25225424
1/27-2/6/25225523
12/2-11/24165529
10/1-10/24175726
Democrat
3/17-27/25384814
1/27-2/6/25414614
12/2-11/24474013
10/1-10/24394120
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: March 17-27, 2025
Question: Thinking about your family’s financial situation, would you say you are living comfortably, just getting by, or struggling to make ends meet?

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted March 17-27, 2025, interviewing 1,021 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.5 percentage points.

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on those about public views of the Supreme Court) are held for release on April 3. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available at the Marquette Law Poll website.

A month before the election, large percentages of registered voters lack opinions of candidates for Wisconsin Supreme Court, state superintendent of public instruction

Although both races are nonpartisan, substantial partisan differences exist in views of the candidates, majority of voters aware balance of the state Supreme Court will be affected

Also:

  • Trump’s job performance: 48% approve, 51% disapprove
  • Wisconsin voters overall are skeptical of tariffs and DOGE
  • Large partisan divides shape opinion on most policy issues

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll survey of Wisconsin finds that large percentages of registered voters remain unfamiliar with the candidates for the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the state superintendent of public instruction less than a month before the April 1 elections.

Among registered voters, 38% don’t offer an opinion on state Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel, former state Attorney General, saying they haven’t heard enough about him or they don’t know if they have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of him. Considerably more, 58%, say they don’t have an opinion of Schimel’s opponent, Susan Crawford.

In the election for state superintendent of public instruction, 64% lack an opinion of incumbent Jill Underly and 71% haven’t heard enough about her opponent, Brittany Kinser.

This Marquette Law School Poll survey was conducted Feb. 19-26, 2025, interviewing 864 Wisconsin registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.6 percentage points. To cover more topics a number of items were asked of a random half-sample of 432 registered voters with a margin of error of +/-6.6 percentage points.

Awareness of the candidates is greater among those who say both that they are certain to vote in the election and that they are very enthusiastic about voting. Table 1 shows the relationship between certainty of voting and enthusiasm for each candidate, as well as the favorable and unfavorable opinions for each. Those very enthusiastic to vote are somewhat more familiar with each candidate than the separately measured group of those who say they are certain to vote. Schimel is the best-known candidate, followed by Crawford, Underly, and Kinser for both those certain to vote and those very enthusiastic. Kinser has the most positive net favorability, followed by Crawford, Underly, and Schimel.

Table 1: Favorability, by certain to vote and by enthusiasm

Among registered voters

InvolvementFavorability
Net favorabilityFavorableUnfavorableNot heard enough/DK
Brad Schimel
Absolutely certain to vote-3374023
Less than certain to vote-4162064
     
Very enthusiastic-1414217
Somewhat enthusiastic or less-4212554
Susan Crawford
Absolutely certain to vote0272746
Less than certain to vote-1061679
     
Very enthusiastic1313039
Somewhat enthusiastic or less-891774
Jill Underly
Absolutely certain to vote-5222751
Less than certain to vote-45985
     
Very enthusiastic-2252748
Somewhat enthusiastic or less-691576
Brittany Kinser
Absolutely certain to vote7231661
Less than certain to vote-63988
     
Very enthusiastic11281755
Somewhat enthusiastic or less-461083
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?
Question: Certainty about voting: What are the chances that you will vote in the April 2025 elections for Wisconsin Supreme Court, state Superintendent of Public Instruction and other offices– are you absolutely certain to vote, very likely to vote, are the chances 50-50, don’t you think you will vote?
Question: Enthusiasm: How enthusiastic are you about voting in the elections in April 2025 for Wisconsin Supreme Court, state Superintendent of Public Instruction and other offices? Would you say you are very, somewhat, not too, or not at all enthusiastic?

Those most involved in the spring elections are those who say they are both certain to vote and are very enthusiastic. This provides a single measure of involvement in the election. This most-involved group makes up 41% of registered voters. For comparison, in the most recent state Supreme Court election, in 2023, 51% of registered voters actually turned out.

Those most involved with the election are much more likely to have an opinion of the candidates than are those who are less involved. The most involved are also more favorable to each of the four candidates than the less involved. There remain differences across the candidates in the percentages of voters without opinions, even among the most involved. Schimel is the best known, followed by Crawford, Underly, and Kinser. Though Kinser is the least known, she has the highest net favorable rating, followed by Crawford, Underly, and Schimel. These results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Favorability, by those most involved

Among registered voters

InvolvementFavorability
Net favorabilityFavorableUnfavorableNot heard enough/DK
Brad Schimel
Certain to vote & very enthusiastic-1424315
Less involved-4212554
Susan Crawford
Certain to vote & very enthusiastic1333236
Less involved-891774
Jill Underly
Certain to vote & very enthusiastic-2262846
Less involved-691577
Brittany Kinser
Certain to vote & very enthusiastic11291853
Less involved-461084
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?
Question (note): Those most involved say they are certain to vote and are very enthusiastic to vote. All others are coded as less involved.

Although these races are officially nonpartisan, opinions of the candidates are nonetheless aligned with partisanship of voters, as shown in Table 3 for Schimel and Table 4 for Crawford. Democrats are a bit more aware of Schimel than are Republicans, with independents least able to rate him. Republicans are strongly favorable to Schimel, with a net favorability of +50, and Democrats strongly unfavorable, at a net favorability of -57. He has a net favorability of -16 among independents.

Table 3: Favorability to Brad Schimel, by party identification

Among registered voters

Party IDFavorability
Net favorabilityFavorableUnfavorableNot heard enough/DK
Among all registered voters-3293238
Republican5056639
Independent-16233938
Democrat-5736037
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?

Crawford is better known to Democrats than to Republicans or, especially, independents, though not as well-known as Schimel in any partisan category. She is strongly favorable among Democrats, a net of +34, and almost equally unfavorable among Republicans with a net of -36, while she is net -11 among independents.

Table 4: Favorability to Susan Crawford by party identification

Among registered voters

Party IDFavorability
Net favorabilityFavorableUnfavorableNot heard enough/DK
Among all registered voters-4192358
Republican-3623861
Independent-11122364
Democrat3440654
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?

Views of the candidates for school superintendent are shown for Underly in Table 5 and for Kinser in Table 6. Both candidates are less well known in each partisan group than are the Supreme Court candidates. The lower name recognition also contributes to net favorability differences by party that are smaller than those for the Court candidates. Republicans give Underly a net favorability of -30, while Democrats give her a +26 favorability and independents a -14.

Table 5: Favorability to Jill Underly, by party identification

Among registered voters

Party IDFavorability
Net favorabilityFavorableUnfavorableNot heard enough/DK
Among all registered voters-4162064
Republican-3043462
Independent-1482269
Democrat2631564
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?

Kinser has the lowest name recognition regardless of partisan group but is the one candidate who is better known among Republicans than among Democrats. Her net favorability among Republicans is +25, and among Democrats it is -19, with independents at -6.

Table 6: Favorability to Brittany Kinser, by party identification

Among registered voters

Party IDFavorability
Net favorabilityFavorableUnfavorableNot heard enough/DK
Among all registered voters3161371
Republican2529466
Independent-6101674
Democrat-1932275
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?

Respondents say they are paying more attention to the state Supreme Court race than to the state school superintendent race. For the court, 39% say they have heard or read a lot about that race, while 18% say the same about the superintendent race.

Just over half of registered voters, 51%, say they have a clear idea of what Schimel stands for, while 41% say they are clear about what Crawford stands for. For Schimel, 14% say they are not clear where he stands, while 35% say they haven’t heard enough or don’t know. In Crawford’s case, 17% say they are not clear what she stands for and 42% say they haven’t heard enough or don’t know.

Trump approval and national issues

After six weeks in office for Donald Trump, 48% of those polled in Wisconsin approve of the job Trump is doing as president and 51% disapprove. Opinion is sharply divided, with 38% who strongly approve and 45% who strongly disapprove. Only 10% somewhat approve and 6% somewhat disapprove.

The partisan gap in approval of Trump is particularly large, with 92% approval among Republicans and 97% disapproval among Democrats. In March 2017, at the beginning of Trump’s first term, 77% of Republicans approved and 81% of Democrats disapproved. In the current poll, independents are more disapproving, 60%, than approving, 39%. In 2017, by contrast, independents were more approving, 42%, than disapproving, 32%. The full table of approval by party identification is shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Trump approval, by party identification

Among registered voters

Party IDApproval
ApproveDisapprove
Feb. 19-26, 2025
Among all registered voters4851
Republican927
Independent3960
Democrat297
March 13-16, 2017
Among all registered voters4147
Republican7713
Independent4232
Democrat981
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin surveys, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

Fifty-nine percent of voters say Trump’s freezing spending and closing of agencies are beyond the president’s authority, while 40% say the president has this authority without needing congressional approval. A majority of Republicans, 74%, say the president has this authority, while 65% of independents and 95% of Democrats say this is beyond the president’s authority.

Opinion is more closely divided on whether Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is properly carrying out Trump’s agenda, with 47% saying it is and 53% saying it is disrupting programs required by law. Among Republicans, 88% say Musk is carrying out Trump’s agenda, but 56% of independents say he is disrupting programs required by law. Almost all Democrats, 97%, say Musk is disrupting programs.

The public is skeptical of Trump’s tariffs, with 32% saying tariffs help the U.S. economy and 51% saying tariffs hurt the economy. Sixteen percent say tariffs don’t make much difference. A majority of Republicans agree with Trump’s position, with 61% saying tariffs help the economy. Among independents, 50% say tariffs hurt the economy, and 92% of Democrats say that.

Trump’s deportation of immigrants in the United States illegally is supported by 61% and opposed by 38%. When asked in a separate question about deportations that include individuals who have been in the country for a number of years and have jobs and no criminal record, 50% favor such deportations while 50% are opposed. In October, 60% favored deporting those in the country illegally, while (under the separate question) the percentage favoring deportations of long-term residents with jobs and no criminal record was 39%.

Elon Musk is viewed favorably by 41% and unfavorably by 53%. Partisan differences in views of Musk are extremely large, with 81% of Republicans favorable to Musk, while 58% of independents and 97% of Democrats are unfavorable.

The Republican Party is seen favorably by 47% and unfavorably by 52%, while the Democratic Party is viewed favorably by 34% and unfavorably by 62%. Democrats are less favorable to their party (76% favorable) than are Republicans to their party (92% favorable).

Court-related issues

While many respondents are unfamiliar with the Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates, a large percentage, 83%, say the election can tip the balance on the Court, while 15% say the election will not affect the balance and 2% say they don’t know. Republicans and Democrats are about equally likely to see the balance of the court as up for grabs, with 81% of Republicans and 87% of Democrats saying so. Among independents, 75% say the balance can change as the result of the election.

Among registered voters, 57% say the outcome of the state Supreme Court election is very important to them, while 35% say it is somewhat important. Only 7% say it is not too important and less than 1% say it is not at all important. Those who say the election is less than very important are much less involved in the election than those who say it is very important.

By a 90% to 10% margin, respondents overwhelmingly support electing judges rather than appointing them. There are modest partisan differences, with 85% of Republicans, 91% of independents, and 95% of Democrats favoring judicial elections.

Voters also favor candidates for the state Supreme Court talking about issues in the campaign, with 79% saying this, while 21% say candidates should avoid talking about issues in order to not be seen as prejudging potential cases. Majorities of each partisan group favor discussion of issues, but Republicans are slightly less supportive of discussing issues. Specifically, 79% of Republicans favor candidates discussing issues, compared to 84% of Democrats, and 63% of independents.

While voters align their views of the candidates with their partisan preferences, they are less positive about parties providing large financial donations to the candidates. Just 38% say party contributions give voters a better idea of what the candidates stand for, while 61% say party contributions reduce the independence of judges from politics. On this question, Republicans are more positive about party contributions, with 42% saying these contributions clarify positions, while 28% of Democrats and 52% of independents say that.

One topic likely to reach the Court in the future is the constitutionality of elements of Act 10, the 2011 law substantially limiting public sector unions in Wisconsin, which was recently struck down by a district court. Overall, Act 10 is supported by 42%, while 54% say the law should be struck down as unconstitutional and 4% say they don’t know. There are substantial partisan divisions over Act 10, with 62% of Republicans favoring the law, while 51% of independents and 76% of Democrats want it struck down. In the October 2018 Marquette Law School Poll, respondents were asked if they preferred to keep Act 10 as it is or to return to collective bargaining as it was before Act 10. Keeping Act 10 was favored by 43%, while returning collective bargaining was favored by 42%.

A substantial majority of the public (64%) favor legal abortions in all or most cases, with 36% who say it should be illegal in all or most cases. Opinion on abortion has remained stable since August 2022, following the U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe .v. Wade.

Photo ID to vote

Requiring a photo ID to vote is favored by 77% and opposed by 22%. In a dozen polls since 2012, the lowest support for the photo ID requirement was 58% in a poll conducted Oct. 9-12, 2014. When asked last in August 2021, 74% favored requiring a photo ID.

A proposed amendment to the Wisconsin Constitution on the April ballot would make the photo ID requirement a constitutional requirement. This is favored by 73% and opposed by 27%. Almost all Republicans, 97%, and 77% of independents favor adding this to the state constitution, while 55% of Democrats are opposed.

Schools and education issues

Across Wisconsin, 58% of people say they are either very satisfied or satisfied with the public schools in their community, while 41% are either very dissatisfied or dissatisfied. Satisfaction was higher from 2012 through 2017 than in 2018 and subsequently. In recent years, favorability has been holding around 60%, with one notable dip in June 2024. The full trend is shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Satisfaction with public schools

Among registered voters

 Satisfaction
WaveVery satisfied/satisfiedVery dissatisfied/dissatisfied
2/19-26/255841
10/16-24/246535
9/18-26/246436
6/12-20/244641
10/26-11/2/236335
6/8-13/236731
9/6-11/226231
4/19-24/226232
10/26-31/216030
8/3-8/216922
1/8-12/205933
9/12-16/186425
3/13-16/177419
4/7-10/157521
5/6-9/137125
3/11-13/138114
5/23-26/127124
5/9-12/126825
4/26-29/126627
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin surveys, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: How satisfied are you with the job the public schools are doing in your community?

The public has become increasingly concerned with holding down property taxes since 2018 and less favorably inclined toward increasing funding for K-12 public schools. In the current survey, 58% say holding down property taxes is more important, while 41% say it is more important to increase funding for schools. In 2013, slightly more people were concerned with property taxes than with school funding, while in 2015 through 2018 a substantial majority was more concerned with school funding. Since 2019, there has been a steady increase in concern about keeping down property taxes, which in polling in 2023 overtook the interest in increasing school funding. The full trend is shown in Table 9.

Table 9: More important to hold down property tax of increase school spending

Among registered voters

Poll datesProperty taxes or schools
Reducing property taxesIncreasing spending on public schools
2/19-26/255841
10/16-24/245544
9/18-26/245644
10/26-11/2/235247
6/8-13/235047
10/24-11/1/224648
10/3-9/224252
9/6-11/224151
8/10-15/224352
4/19-24/224650
8/3-8/214252
2/19-23/203856
1/8-12/204155
1/16-20/193955
10/24-28/184055
10/3-7/183757
9/12-16/183857
8/15-19/183261
6/13-17/183559
2/25-3/1/183363
4/7-10/154054
5/6-9/134946
3/11-13/134946
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin surveys, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Which is more important to you: reduce property taxes or increase spending on public schools?

Sixty percent say Wisconsin schools have set standards lower than they should be, with 34% saying standards are about where they should be and 6% saying standards are too high. In 2014, 47% said standards were too low, 32% said they were about right, and 15% said standards were too high. An additional 5% said they didn’t know.

Despite most people having an opinion of standards, a large group, 45%, say they haven’t heard enough to know if reading test scores have gone up or down over the past five years. Similarly, 43% haven’t heard enough about math test scores to have an opinion, and 54% haven’t heard enough about whether the achievement gap between high-income and low- income students has changed. Few respondents think either reading or math scores have gone up, with more saying both have gone down than saying they have remained the same. These responses are shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Test scores and achievement gap

Among registered voters

MeasureChange
Gone upStayed sameGone downHaven’t heard enough
Reading test scores5193245
Math test scores4203243
Achievement gap1820854
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin survey, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: In the public schools in your community, over the last five years, would you say reading test scores have gone up, stayed about the same, gone down, or haven’t you heard enough to say?
Question: In the public schools in your community, over the last five years, would you say math test scores have gone up, stayed about the same, gone down, or haven’t you heard enough to say?
Question: In the public schools in your community, over the last five years, would you say the gap in test scores between low-income and high-income students has gone up, stayed about the same, gone down, or haven’t you heard enough to say?

A majority, 57%, favor allowing all students statewide to use vouchers to attend private or religious schools if they wish, with 43% opposed. Majorities of Republicans, 74%, and independents, 54%, favor statewide vouchers for all students, while 59% of Democrats are opposed.

When asked about choosing whether to increase the state budget for students to attend private schools or increase the budget for public schools, 33% would increase funding for private schools and 67% would increase funding for public schools. A majority (57%) of Republicans would increase funding for private schools, while 69% of independents and 93% of Democrats would increase funding for public schools.

A majority (76%) favor a major increase in funding for special education in the schools, while 23% are opposed. Majorities of all partisan groups favor increasing special-education budgets, with 59% of Republicans, 72% of independents, and 97% of Democrats in favor.

Gov. Tony Evers’ proposal to include $300 million for mental health services in schools statewide is favored by 66% and opposed by 34%. This proposal is opposed by 64% of Republicans and favored by 69% of independents and 94% of Democrats.

Five years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the public is closely divided on whether the closures of schools and businesses were an appropriate response. Fifty-one percent say they were appropriate steps, while 49% say they did more harm than good. This is the closest result in Marquette Law School Poll surveys on whether the closures in 2020 were appropriate or an overreaction. Throughout 2020, more than two-thirds said the closures were appropriate, declining to 56% in 2022. The full trend is shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Were closures during the pandemic appropriate or an overreaction

Among registered voters

Poll datesAppropriate or overreaction
Appropriate responseOverreaction
2/19-26/255149
9/6-11/225641
2/22-27/226135
8/3-8/216235
10/21-25/206826
6/14-18/207225
5/3-7/206926
3/24-29/208610
Marquette Law School Poll, Wisconsin surveys, latest: Feb. 19-26, 2025
Question: Do you think the decision in 2020 to close schools and businesses and to restrict the size of public gatherings was an appropriate response to the coronavirus outbreak or was it an overreaction that did more harm than good?

Partisans are extremely polarized on the issue of closures, with 80% of Republicans saying closures were an overreaction and 88% of Democrats saying they were appropriate responses. Independents are a bit more evenly divided with 40% saying closures were appropriate and 58% saying they were an overreaction.

State budget and related issues

A legislative proposal to extend post-partum Medicaid coverage to a full year for new mothers is supported by 67% and opposed by 33%. This is opposed by 54% of Republicans but supported by 74% of independents and 85% of Democrats.

Ending all diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in Wisconsin universities, public schools, and state government is favored by 50% and opposed by 49%. A large majority of Republicans, 86%, favor ending DEI programs, while 92% of Democrats oppose ending DEI. Independents are somewhat closely divided, with 44% in favor of ending DEI programs and 55% opposed.

So-called “red flag laws,” which would allow police to take guns from people found by a judge to be a danger to themselves or others, are supported by 85% and opposed by 15%. This issue is a rare case with large majorities of Republicans, 79%, independents, 68%, and Democrats, 98%, each in favor.

The public is narrowly divided on several issues. On requiring state employees to return to work in their physical offices, 54% favor and 45% oppose a policy of returning to offices.

A similar divide is seen on requiring county law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration officials to identify immigrants in the United States illegally, and for counties to lose some state revenue if they do not cooperate. Overall, 54% favor this and 45% oppose.

A proposal by Governor Evers to make permanent a child-care subsidy that began during the COVID-19 pandemic but that is set to expire is favored by 54% and opposed by 45%.

With respect to a request by the Universities of Wisconsin system for an $800 million budget increase, 57% are opposed and 42% in favor.

Approval of governor, legislature, and Wisconsin Supreme Court

Evers’ job approval as governor is 49%, with 44% disapproval. That is a slight decline from October 2024. Six percent say they don’t know.

Approval of how the legislature is handling its job is 38%, with disapproval at 49% and 13% who don’t know. When last asked in September 2024, 33% approved and 55% disapproved.

Approval of the Wisconsin Supreme Court stands at 46%, with 37% who disapprove, and 16% who don’t know. In September 2024, 44% approved and 40% disapproved.

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The Marquette Law School Poll is the most extensive statewide polling project in Wisconsin history. The survey was conducted Feb. 19-26, 2025 , interviewing 864 Wisconsin registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.6 percentage points. To cover more topics a number of items were asked of a random half-sample of 432 registered voters with a margin of error of +/-6.6 percentage points. The half-sample items are listed below.

Half-sample items:

  • Immigration: Deport those in United States illegally; deport those in United States illegally even if they have lived here for a number of years, have jobs, and no criminal record.
  • School issues: reading and math scores; achievement gap; education standards; statewide vouchers for all; increase support for students to attend private or public schools; major increase for special education; was decision to close schools and businesses appropriate or an overreaction; $300 million for school mental health.
  • Supreme Court issues: appoint or elect judges; should judicial candidates talk about issues; clear idea of what Schimel stands for; clear idea of what Crawford stands for; Act 10; party contributions to Court candidates; importance of state Supreme Court election; can the election tip the balance on the Court.
  • Budget and policy issues: require state employees to return to office; require county law enforcement to aid federal immigration officials; end DEI programs in universities, schools, and state government; red flag law; $500 million for child-care subsidy; $800 million increase for Universities of Wisconsin; extend Medicaid post-partum coverage for mothers to 12 months.

The survey was conducted with a hybrid sample of 641 respondents selected from the Wisconsin voter registration list and 223 selected from the SSRS Opinion Panel, a sample drawn from postal addresses across the state and invited to take part in surveys online. The interview was conducted online with 740 respondents and with 124 by telephone with a live interviewer. Full details of the methodology are contained in the methodology statement at the link below.

The partisan makeup of the sample is 36% Republican, 32% Democratic, and 32% independent. When independents who lean to a party are counted as partisans the sample is 46% Republican, 42% Democratic, and 13% independent. In all polls conducted in 2024, the combined samples were 33% Republican, 31% Democratic, and 36% independent. Counting independents who lean to a party as partisans, the 2024 samples were 45% Republican, 42% Democratic, and 12% independent.