We Are All Sikhs

The day after the dreadful attacks of September 11, 2001, the French newspaper Le Monde published an editorial under the headline “Nous Sommes Tous Américains” (“We Are All Americans”).  The headline was meant to convey not only that the French people stood behind Americans in our desperate hour, but also that they shared our vulnerability as well as our responsibility in an increasingly dangerous world.  The editorial warned that modern technology enables suicidal warriors of all ideological stripes to do more damage than ever before, and the writer emphasized that all leaders need to act to discourage ordinary people from joining the murderous aims of warmongers like those who wreaked havoc on September 11th.

On Sunday, a smaller — but no less terrible — act of carnage occurred in Oak Creek, when a lone gunman killed six people and wounded three others before he was shot and killed by a police officer.  Deaths by violence are always terrible, but this was also an attack against an entire religious community that resides among us.

I first began to learn about Sikhism a few years ago when one of my students, herself a Sikh, kindly gave me a book about her religion.  The religion was founded in the 15th century and has over 20 million followers throughout the world.  Sikhs believe in one God, Whom they believe is the same Supreme Being worshipped by followers of other religions.  To quote from the website www.Sikhs.org, “Sikhism preaches that people of different races, religions, or sex are all equal in the eyes of God.  It teaches the full equality of men and women.”  The Sikh religion also emphasizes tolerance, honesty, community service, and sharing with those in need.

It is beyond ironic that members of a group devoted to peace, equality and tolerance were violently slaughtered in what the FBI is investigating as an act of domestic terrorism.

Why did this violent attack occur?  It now appears that the gunman, Wade Michael Page, was a man filled with hatred who had affiliations with white supremacist groups.  It is not clear why he singled out the Sikhs in order to vent his rage at non-white people, but some members of the temple suggested that Page may have confused the turban-wearing Sikhs with members of the Taliban, who also wear turbans.  Unfortunately, this country has seen several shooting rampages of this nature in the past, such as Columbine, the Arizona attack in which Gabrielle Giffords was wounded (and several other people were killed or wounded), and the more recent Colorado shootings.  There are many things which could be said about the Oak Creek shootings, but I will address only two points here.

First, the attempts to answer the haunting question “Why?” have begun, and the answers that are emerging are complex and confusing.  It is easy to say Page shot his victims because he was a white supremacist, but how did he end up that way?  How does someone become so hate-filled that he actually thinks Hitler was a good guy?  As a family and children’s law scholar, I can say that the first presumption is often that something went awry in his childhood – witness the parent-bashing that occurred after Columbine, even though there were no real facts to justify blaming the parents there.  Yet today, Page’s sobbing stepmother told media sources that she has no idea what could have made Page do this.  In a New York Times article, Laura Page described her stepson as “a precious little boy” who was a “mellow” and “soft-spoken” lover of music, camping, fishing, and Monopoly.  Wade Page lost his mother when he was only 12 or 13, and he took it hard, but many children have suffered the death of a parent without growing into mass murderers.  It is a troubling truth that the best parenting in the world cannot guarantee that a child will grow into a good member of society, and conversely even children who suffer horrible maltreatment may grow into wonderful citizens.

My second observation is that the fear of people who are “different from us” seems to be growing in some segments of society.  We have seen a lot of angry young men with guns lately – and for the moment it does seem to be mainly men.  Why are they so violent and angry?  Are they frightened, misguided, mentally ill, misinformed, afraid, evil, or some combination thereof?  The answer is probably slightly different for each of them, but to echo the French editorial of a decade ago, we all need to act so as to reduce the fear and hatred that drives these terrorists.  We need to educate ourselves and others about the different racial, religious and cultural traditions in our community.  We need to speak up when others make prejudiced comments.  We need to recognize that there is more than one way to worship God, more than one way to raise our children, and more than one way to be patriotic.

We need to listen with kindness and openness to people who are in some way different from us.  In the end, though, we are more the same than different.  We are all trying to find our way and live our lives.  We stand beside our Sikh neighbors in their tragedy, and like them we are all vulnerable.  We are all Sikhs.

This Post Has 3 Comments

  1. Nick Zales

    I agree with this post. But I would be remiss if I did not point out the United States, under false pretenses, launched a war of aggression against the sovereign nation of Iraq. The result was the death of anywhere between 100,000 and 500,000 innocent civilians. Many towns and villages were totally destroyed.

    Obviously, the man in Oak Creek was a demented lunatic, whatever his motives. But what of the United States? If to kill seven people in a rampage raises a world-wide hue and cry, as it should, why is killing 100,000 people in a false war not seen in the same light?

  2. Melissa Greipp

    Thank you for your thoughtful post.

    This sentence from Wikipedia under the entry “Sikh” also provides a helpful description of Sikhism: “Sikhism teaches to respect all other religions (tolerance) and that one should defend the rights of not just one’s own religion but the religion and faith of others as a human right. At the end of every Sikh prayer is a supplication for the welfare of all of humanity.”

  3. Nick Zales

    Those are nice thoughts, Melissa. We need to move the whole world away from using militarism and violence as a way of solving problems to peaceful ways. We should start at home. One way to do it would be to use the United Nations for the purpose for which it was designed. Today’s United Nations is just a meaningless debating society. If they get rid of the security council veto and start from the premise that all sovereign countries are equals, that would be a good start. War and killing should always be the last resort, not the first.

    In the meantime, we as a country should place the same demands on and questions to our government that we put to situations like the tragedy in Oak Creek.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.