From Marquette Law School to the National Football League Part I: Claude Taugher

The opening of a new NFL season provides an opportunity for the Marquette family to remember that there was a time when Marquette University was a regular supplier of players to the National Football League.  In the early 1920s, this could be said about the Marquette Law School as well as Marquette College.

An earlier post described the career of Lavern “Lavvy” Dilweg, L ’27, who, after an All-American career at Marquette, played for the Milwaukee Badgers and Green Bay Packers in the National Football League.  After his playing career ended, Dilweg became a prominent lawyer in Green Bay and also served as a United States Congressman during the Second World War.

In addition to Dilweg, at least two other former Marquette law students—Claude “Biff” Taugher and Laurence “Mac” McGinnis—played in the NFL in the 1920s.  To this list could also be added the name of Paul Robeson, who studied informally at the law school while playing for the Milwaukee Badgers in 1922.

This article deals with the career of “Biff” Taugher, a war hero turned law student who played fullback for the Green Bay Packers during the 1922 season.  A second post will deal with Taugher’s teammate, law school classmate, and fellow NFL alumnus, Laurence McGinnis.

Claude Buckley Taugher was born in 1895, in Marathon County, Wisconsin, the son of country doctor P.J. Taugher and Mary Buckley Taugher. Taugher attended high school in Wausau, and at age 21 enrolled at Carroll College in Waukesha, where he played varsity football.

In 1917, Taugher’s college career was interrupted by the United States’ entry in World War I.  That year, he left Carroll College for the United States Marines, in which he was commissioned a second lieutenant.

Fighting in France in November 1918, as a member of the 6th Regiment of the Marine Corps’ 2nd Division, Taugher’s platoon successfully stormed the French village of Bayonville, capturing 61 German soldiers in the process.  Although wounded in the battle, Taugher refused to leave his troops.  For his “extraordinary heroism in action,” he was subsequently awarded both the Navy Cross and the Distinguished Service Cross.  Nine days after the incident at Bayonville, the Armistice was signed, and Taugher was discharged from the Marines as a first lieutenant on August 15, 1919.

Returning to Wisconsin, Taugher enrolled at Marquette for the fall 1919 semester and immediately became part of the football team. Initially enrolling in the college, he entered the law school the following fall (1920) as a full-time day student.

Marquette was a regional power in college football in the late 1910s and 1920s, and during Taugher’s three years on the team, the Hilltoppers compiled records of 6-2-1, 6-1-0, and 6-2-1.  Taugher’s first season with the team included both 20-0 and 31-0 trouncings of his former school, Carroll College, and a disappointing 13-0 loss to the University of Wisconsin.  (The Marquette-UW “series” ended after the 1919 season and did not resume until 1932.)

Clearly, the most highly publicized game of Taugher’s career at Marquette was the November 19, 1921 match in Milwaukee between Marquette and Knute Rockne’s Fighting Irish of Notre Dame.  In the post-World War I era, Notre Dame was universally recognized as the strongest team in college football—it went undefeated in 1919 and 1920, and from 1919 to 1924, it compiled an overall record of 55-4-0.

Undeterred, Marquette jumped out to an early 7-0 lead on a 4th down touchdown by Taugher that followed a blocked punt.  Notre Dame scored to tie the game in the second period, but the game, described by the New York Times as “slowed considerably by a wet and muddy field,” remained deadlocked until the final period when the Marquette defense finally succumbed, allowing Notre Dame to hobble away with a 21-7 victory.

The Hilltoppers rebounded the following week with a 7-0 victory over Wabash in the season finale.  Not counting the Notre Dame game, Marquette outscored its 1921 opponents by a total of 130 points to 8, while keeping all eight opponents from scoring a touchdown.   (The 8 points came on two field goals and a safety.)  Besides the Notre Dame loss, the only two “blemishes” on the team’s record were a 3-0 loss to Creighton and a 0-0 tie with Ripon.

His college eligibility exhausted, Taugher appears to have either withdrawn or been dismissed from the law school after the fall semester of 1921.  In September 1922, he signed a contract with the Green Bay Packers, but only after assuring Packer player-coach Curly Lambeau that he had no remaining college eligibility.

Under the NFL’s own rules, teams were not permitted to sign players who still retained college eligibility.  The Packers had been expelled from the NFL in January of 1922 because of the team’s use of still-eligible college players the previous season, and while they were subsequently reinstated with new ownership, Lambeau was particularly concerned that the team sign no more ineligible players.

At the time of his signing, which predated the NFL draft by more than a decade, Taugher was already well known to the Packers, and not just because of his success at Marquette.  In 1920, following the conclusion of the Marquette season, Taugher had joined a team known as the Milwaukee All-Stars which scheduled a game against the Packers, then an independent professional team.  (Green Bay would join the NFL, still known as the Professional Football Association of America, the following year.)  Taugher had starred in the game, and two years later, his exploits in that game were still clearly remembered in Green Bay.

At the time he signed with the Packers, Taugher was 27 years old, and weighed in at 5’10” tall and 185 pounds.  He would be one of seven former Marquette football players who would appear in games for the Packers during the 1922 season.

Unfortunately, Taugher’s stint with the Packers proved to be quite brief.  Early in the season, he lost the battle for the starting fullback position to a 29-year-old rookie from Penn State named Stan Mills. As a Packer, Taugher played in only two games, one of which he started, and according to the Neft and Cohen Encyclopedia of Professional Football, in those two games he carried the ball only four times for a total of two yards.  However, one of his carries did result in a touchdown.

With a roster limited by league rules to 18 players, the Packers apparently concluded that they did not have a spot for Taugher, and the 27-year-old fullback was cut loose.  After starting the season 0-3-0, the Taugher-less Packers rebounded by winning four games and tying three in their final seven games.

Relatively little is known about the details of Taugher’s life after his departure from the Packers, but it appears that there were many bumps in the road in a life marked by deception, petty crime, and alcohol.  In the summer of 1923, Taugher was appointed head football coach of Mount St. Charles College in Helena, Montana, and his impending arrival was celebrated by the Helena newspaper.  Coincidentally, the Montana team, like Marquette in Taugher’s time, was nicknamed the “Hilltoppers.”  However, a story in the Helena paper reported that in addition to being a football star, Taugher was also a graduate of Carroll College and the Marquette Law School.  Neither assertion was correct, and one guesses that Taugher was the source of the misinformation.

However, by the time the 1923 season began Taugher was no longer the coach at the Montana school, and instead was engaged as head coach at his undergraduate alma mater, Carroll College of Waukesha, Wisconsin.  Whether Taugher resigned the Montana position when the Carroll opening appeared or whether he was fired by his new employer is not known.  (Somewhat ironically, Mount St. Charles College changed its name to Carroll College in 1932, and, still sporting that name, is today a leading small college football power.)

Alas, Taugher was no more successful as a college coach than he was as an NFL fullback.  Carroll went winless in 1923, and after the end of the season, Taugher’s contract was not renewed.

Taugher appears to have led something of a vagabond existence, dividing his post-football life between the Fox Valley, Milwaukee, and Washington, D.C.  He married Marguerite Heney in Green Bay in 1926, and the couple had four children, three of whom survived to adulthood.  Although Taugher lived in different places in the 1930s and 1940s, his daughters all appear to have graduated from high school in Green Bay.

While his stay with the Packers had been brief, he was apparently recognized as a member of the Packer family, and in 1928, he participated in one of the first Packer homecoming games in Green Bay, although reports of his appearance mistakenly referred to him as a prominent physician in Milwaukee.  In 1930, he was appointed to the position of Probation Officer in Milwaukee, but in 1935, he was convicted of the offense of drunk in public in Washington, D.C.  A similarly embarrassing incident occurred in 1943, when he resided in Appleton.

Taugher died on February 8, 1963, and was buried Milwaukee’s Wood National Cemetery.

Years after his death, Claude Taugher also appeared as a character in Clarence J. Rockey’s 2006 novel, The Tin Tie, which is a fictional account of a young German soldier from World War I who emigrates to Milwaukee and enrolls at Marquette.  The protagonist joins the Marquette football team where one of his teammates is Claude Taugher.  Taugher graciously befriends the young “Kraut,” even though he quickly learns that he and his new teammate had only a year earlier been trying to kill each other on the battlefields of Europe.

Continue ReadingFrom Marquette Law School to the National Football League Part I: Claude Taugher

New Study Shows Regional Disparity in African-American College Performance

Racial disparities in education has been one of the central legal and cultural problems in post-World  War II America.  A recent study published by The Education Trust reveals yet another example of the problem of African-American underperformance, although the data compiled has a fascinating regional twist.

The Education Trust study focuses on comparative graduation rates for black and white students at the same colleges and universities.  Data was collected from 456 colleges and universities throughout the United States.  For the study as a whole black students are twenty percent less likely to graduate from college than their white counterparts who attend the same school.

However, the discrepancy in graduation rates is not uniform.  At some colleges and universities, African-Americans graduate at the same or nearly the same rate as white students.  At other schools, the gap is as wide as thirty-four percent.

Although the Education Trust study does not address the issue of regional variance, it is apparent from the results presented that the gap between white and black graduation rates is much lower in the South than it is in other regions of the country, and that the gap is particularly wide in Wisconsin.

Of the 29 public universities where black student graduate at the same (or greater) frequency as whites, 23 are in the South.  (I am defining any state that permitted slavery in 1860 as a “Southern” jurisdiction.)  In contrast, of the 25 public universities where the disparity between black and white graduation rates is the greatest, all are outside the South.  The latter group includes the Madison, Milwaukee, and Whitewater campuses of the University of Wisconsin.

The same regional pattern can also be seen in private schools.  Of the thirteen private schools listed in which black graduation rates equal that of whites, only one is outside the South.  In contrast, the twenty-one of the twenty-five private schools with greatest variation are outside the South.  Included among the twenty-one are Milwaukee’s Alverno College and Marquette University.

Why African-American college students appear to be playing on a more level playing field in the South is a fascinating question, as is the question of why African-American students at several of Wisconsin’s best universities have trouble obtaining the same graduation rates as their white peers.

The study can be found here.

Continue ReadingNew Study Shows Regional Disparity in African-American College Performance

Do Grading Systems Affect the Level of Effort Put Forth by Law Students?

Marquette Law School’s current grading system, which is representative of contemporary law school systems, limits the number of honors and B-level grades by imposing a mandatory mean grade of 3.0. Figuratively speaking, for every grade awarded above the level of B, there must a grade awarded an equal distance below a B.  Our previous system limited the number of honors grades but placed no limit on the number of B’s that an instructor could award.  Neither system “required” instructors to award any specific number of “bad” grades, i.e., grades of C or lower, which fall below the level necessary to remain a student in good standing, although it is much harder to avoid doing so under the current system.

One justification for the new system is that by making “bad” grades more likely, students will work harder.  Whether or not this is a consequence of the new grading system is an open question.

I do believe that grading systems can be used to modify student behavior but to have a noticeable effect, the changes have to be pretty significant.

When I started teaching at Chicago-Kent in 1987, the school had a mandatory curve that dictated that at least 55 percent of grades had to be C+ or lower. (C+ was by far the most common grade.)  A C+ was a 2.5, and below 2.1 was a flunk out.

Students who maintained a straight C+ average, of whom there were many, often worried that they were just one bad examination period away from flunking out.  Anecdotal evidence suggests that a similar system (albeit one that used numbers rather than grades) was in effect at Marquette before the mid-1980’s.

Chicago Kent students worked very hard to avoid the C range of grades, although of course most of them were destined to receive them.  No matter how much the law school emphasized that C+ was not a bad grade, student balked at seeing it that way.  The onset of grade inflation in the 1960’s meant that the days when C was an acceptable mid-range grade had been over a long time by 1987.

The argument that the Kent curve was disadvantaging its students compared to those at Loyola and DePaul in the competition for jobs finally carried the day, and in 1991, the school went to a system in which only 20 percent of the grades were required to be B- or lower.  Overnight, the standard grade went from a C+ to a B.

Within a year, it was noticeable that students were not working as hard as they had in the past.  On the other hand, there was also noticeably less anxiety about grades on the part of students.

The last law school that I know of to have such a draconian curve or mandatory mean was Loyola Marymount of Los Angeles, but that school threw in the towel on rigorous grading earlier this summer.  Loyola received considerable attention recently when it raised its mean grade point average from 2.7 to 3.0, and retroactively raised its current students’ GPA’s by 0.3, across the board.

If law schools really want their students to work harder, they can accomplish that end by grading much more rigorously.  But who would have the fortitude to install such a grading curve in the twenty-first century?  My guess is no one.

Continue ReadingDo Grading Systems Affect the Level of Effort Put Forth by Law Students?