Join Us at the Law Alumni Awards Reception

Students, alumni, faculty, administrators, staff — indeed, all who in any way form part of the Marquette University Law School community — are warmly encouraged to attend the annual Law Alumni Awards Reception this coming Thursday, April 23, 5:30 p.m., in the Monaghan Ballroom at the Alumni Memorial Union. The Law Alumni Awards Reception, which is in the nature of a cocktail party with a program, is among my own favorite events of the year. Partly this is because of the specific individuals to whom we give awards: this year, these individuals are Robert J. Berdan, L’75 (Alumnus of the Year); Larry B. Brueggeman, L’69 (Lifetime Achievement Award); Robert E. Webb Jr., L’97 (Howard B. Eisenberg Service Award); and Kristi L. Schoepfer, L’01 (Charles W. Mentkowski Sports Law Alumna of the Year). Mostly, though, my enjoyment of the ceremony comes from opportunity to celebrate the ideal of the Marquette lawyer that the particular award-winners — and many other alumni — have realized over the years. Marquette lawyers have done important things during the past century-plus, and the nature of life is that many of these things will go unrecognized, unrewarded, and even unappreciated. How appropriate, then, to pause at the end of our academic year, as part of the University’s Alumni National Awards Weekend, in order to reflect on the specific but representative ways in which certain alumni, selected by the Law Alumni Association, have exemplified the Law School’s ideals and spirit since graduation — and perhaps, incidentally, to inspire those of our students who will graduate this May and join the ranks of their forbears as Marquette lawyers. We regard the event as sufficiently important that classes end for the semester late on Thursday afternoon, so that all who are interested may attend. And I hope that “all who are interested” are all of us. It is helpful if you r.s.v.p. here, but feel free to attend even if you haven’t done so. I hope to see you on Thursday.

Continue ReadingJoin Us at the Law Alumni Awards Reception

Imaginative Justice in the Trial Court: Judge Sarah Evans Barker to Deliver Hallows Lecture Next Week

Next Tuesday, April 14, will be the occasion for the Law School’s Hallows Lecture. This annual event, named in memory of the late Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice (and Marquette Professor) E. Harold Hallows, brings to the school a distinguished jurist who in a variety of ways has occasion to converse with and teach students, faculty, and others. Past Hallows Lecturers have included Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court and Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. More recently, over the last three years, the Hallows Lecture has served as the occasion for a significant address by a judge serving on a federal court of appeals (as can be seen in the 2006 speech by Judge Diane S. Sykes, L’84, of the Seventh Circuit, the 2007 speech by Judge Carolyn Dineen King of the Fifth Circuit, and the 2008 speech by Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain of the Ninth Circuit).

I am very pleased that this year, for the first time, the Hallows Lecture will be delivered by a distinguished sitting trial judge: viz., the Honorable Sarah Evans Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Judge Barker, who has served on the federal bench since 1984 and is president of the Federal Judges Association (a voluntary organization of Article III judges), is a national figure among trial judges and the federal judiciary more broadly. For the Hallows Lecture, she has selected as her title “Beyond Decisional Templates: The Role of Imaginative Justice in the Trial Court,” and takes as her point of departure Judge Richard A. Posner’s recent book, How Judges Think (Harvard, 2008).

The following is from the Law School’s description of the lecture: “Accepting Judge Posner’s premise that under certain circumstances judges must perform as legislators, Judge Sarah Evans Barker will attempt to expand his focus on appellate decision-making to include a discussion of when and how this approach is and can and should be properly applied in the trial court and of the role of imagination when adjudicating in the ‘open area.'”

The lecture will take place in Room 307 at 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 14. The event is open to all, but registration is required.

Continue ReadingImaginative Justice in the Trial Court: Judge Sarah Evans Barker to Deliver Hallows Lecture Next Week

Let the (Oral) Argument Begin

Kudos (on getting this far) and best wishes (as we move forward) to the sixteen upper-level students who are competing this week in the quarterfinals of the Jenkins Moot Court Competition. The students earned this right based on their top performance in last fall’s Appellate Writing and Advocacy course, which is a prerequisite or gateway to both the intramural Jenkins Competition and all extramural or interscholastic moot-court competitions. The students are paired into eight teams of two for purposes of the Jenkins Competition:

  • Lindsay Caldwell & Lindsey Johnson
  • Alyssa Dowse & Tim Sheehey
  • Jessica Farley & Brent Simerson
  • Sandy Giernoth & Megann Senfleben
  • Tim Hassel & Joe Brydges
  • Rachel Helmers & Nick Harken
  • Amber Peterson & Allison Ziegler
  • Nicole Standback & Bridget Mueller

Each team writes a brief in the first half of the spring semester and has a chance to argue twice in a round of quarterfinals. Thereupon, based on a weighted scoring of the brief and the oral arguments, four teams advance to the semifinals. The briefs having been “filed” several weeks ago, the oral arguments begin this week, and culminate in the Jenkins Finals at the United States Courthouse at 6 p.m. on Thursday, April 2.

More information on the reasons the Law School structures its moot-court competition this way can be found in this article from the Marquette Lawyer or at the moot-court webpage (and a student’s perspective can be found in a very fine post by a guest blogger last month, Jessica Franklin). I hope that all will join me in congratulating and wishing well to this year’s Jenkins competitors.

Continue ReadingLet the (Oral) Argument Begin
Newer Posts
Older Posts