Quill Awards

I enjoyed the Marquette Law Review‘s annual banquet Friday night.  United States District Court Judge William Griesbach delivered a thought-provoking talk on “The Joy of Law.”  But the personal highlight for me may have been the opportunity, along with my fellow faculty advisor Dan Blinka, to announce the winners of this year’s Golden and Silver Quill Awards for top student comments in the Law Review.  The Golden Quill went to Charles Stone for his comment on classical Chinese attitudes regarding what we might now call plagiarism, which was published at 92 Marq. L. Rev. 199.  The Silver Quill went to Ben Crouse for his comment on worksite immigration raids, which will be published in the upcoming spring issue of the Law Review (Vol. 92, No. 3).  Both of the award-winning comments should be regarded as exemplars of outstanding student scholarship by future generations of Law Review comment-writers.  Congratulations to Ben and Charles!  Congratulations also to Melissa McCord and her colleagues for presenting such a fine program Friday night.

Continue ReadingQuill Awards

Community Justice Conference Follow-Up

As discussed in an earlier post, the Law School recently hosted a very successful conference on community justice in Wisconsin.  More than 200 government officials, lawyers, and citizens came together to discuss how the criminal justice system can be improved at the local level through enhanced interagency collaboration and grass-roots citizen engagement.  The Conference website has now been updated to include audio and video of the Conference, reports, and links to blogs and commentary to keep the conversation moving forward.  Still to come on the website are workgroup reports and conference evaluation results.  Thanks to Assistant Dean Dan Idzikowski for his leadership of this important Law School initiative.

Continue ReadingCommunity Justice Conference Follow-Up

Esenberg on the Establishment Clause

Rick Esenberg has two interesting recent additions to the SSRN database of scholarly papers, both of which develop his theory of “a more modest Establishment Clause.”  Here is the abstract of the first paper, entitled “Of Speeches and Sermons: Worship in Limited Purpose Public Forums”:

Recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court have held that governments who create limited purpose public forums may not exclude even “quintessentially religious” speech that is otherwise within the purpose of the forum. Nevertheless, governments frequently attempt to exclude religious speech that might be characterized as “worship” from such forums and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in conflict with the Second and (arguably) Seventh Circuits, has upheld such exclusion.

This article addresses whether worship can be regarded as a separate category of speech that may be constitutionally excluded from limited purpose public forums. To assess the idea that worship is “different,” it briefly assesses mainstream Christian theology concerning worship and concludes that worship is likely to communicate ideas about life in the world that are within the boundaries of most broadly defined public forums. Exclusion of such speech would be inconsistent with the Court’s insistence upon neutrality between religion and irreligion and is unnecessary to avoid the risk or appearance of establishing religion.  

The paper is forthcoming in the Mississippi Law Journal

Continue ReadingEsenberg on the Establishment Clause