And What Should We Do About Third-Graders’ Reading Proficiency?

Gov. Scott Walker told school leaders from Wisconsin in a speech last week that he wants all children to read at grade level when they finish third grade. Conquering the basics of reading by that point is widely held by educators to be a key to long-term success for students.  Walker used the phrases used by some educators, saying that, through third grade, children learn to read, but from fourth grade on, they read to learn. So a kid who isn’t reading well in later grades will be a kid who isn’t learning well. “I just think that’s imperative,” Walker said, to make proficient reading a benchmark for every child before fourth grade starts.

I agree with that. You agree with that. We all agree with that. So what do we do about it?

Walker didn’t spell out what kind of action he would put behind the idea.

Does he favor ending the practice called social promotion?

Continue ReadingAnd What Should We Do About Third-Graders’ Reading Proficiency?

County Executive Candidates: Trying to Establish Their Identities

The new guy. The outsider. The insider. The legislator in line with Scott Walker. The former legislator critical of Scott Walker.

A crucial part of running for office, especially when you’re not a household name, is establishing an identity in the minds of the general public. The most interesting part of watching the first joint appearance of the five candidates for Milwaukee County Executive last week was not in the position statements and answers the five gave. It was in how they tried to identify themselves.

The session, held in the Appellate Courtroom of Eckstein Hall and moderated by Mike Gousha, the Law School’s distinguished fellow in law and public policy, was co-sponsored by the Law School and the Milwaukee press Club. A full house of about 200 was on hand and the session was broadcast later on television.

Continue ReadingCounty Executive Candidates: Trying to Establish Their Identities

Will the NLRB Change Its Position on Captive Audience Speeches?

This is the question that Paul Secunda considers in a new paper, “The Future of NLRB Doctrine on Captive Audience Speeches.” Under established doctrine, employers may require employees who are contemplating unionization to attend meetings at which speeches opposed to unionization are presented.  However, the National Labor Relations Board has recently undergone some significant membership changes that could conceivably lead to reconsideration of the “captive audience” doctrine.  Paul’s paper describes how this reconsideration might come about and discusses potential outcomes.  His conclusion:

I believe the Board will likely not prohibit all captive audience meetings as I believe they could, and should, do under current law.  Rather, the Board is likely to engage in a more restrained approach based on already-existing doctrines and cases given the Board’s desire to avoid the misimpression that it is merely engaging in politically-motivated flip-flopping.

Paul’s paper was part of a symposium at Indiana University-Bloomington on labor and employment law under the Obama Administration.  The abstract appears after the jump.

Continue ReadingWill the NLRB Change Its Position on Captive Audience Speeches?