Also:

• 74% of Republicans, 35% of independents, and 22% of Democrats approve of the job the Court is doing
• A majority of Republicans think the Court rarely or never sides with Trump; three-quarters of Democrats say the Court often or fairly often sides with Trump
• The public sees the Court’s justices through partisan filters, though many are unfamiliar with the individual justices
• A majority of public favors the Court’s decision in 11 of 13 cases this past term
• More say the next president should have less control over departments and agencies than say he should have more control
• 69% say Congress has not done its job, giving too much power to the president
• 58% say it is possible for Congress to take back some of the power it has given up

MILWAUKEE — A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds 47% of adults approve of the way the United States Supreme Court is handling its job, while 53% disapprove. In May, 46% approved and 54% disapproved.

Approval has remained below 50% since November 2025, after an approval rating consistently above 50% for the first half of 2025, including a high of 54% in March 2025.

Approval of the Court varies substantially across party lines, with 74% of Republicans approving of the Court, while 35% of independents and 22% of Democrats approve. Among Republicans, there has been a gradual decline in approval of the Court from 84% in February 2025 to 74% now. Approval among independents has also declined from 46% in February 2025 to 35% now, though approval has recovered from a low of 26% in January 2026. Approval among Democrats was as high as 31% in March and May 2025 but has held in the high teens to low 20s since then, standing at 22% in this July survey. Approval by party in 2025 and 2026 is shown in Figure 1, and the percentage values are shown in Table 1. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)

Table 1: Approval of U.S. Supreme Court, by party identification

Among adults

Date	Approval
	All adults	Republican	Independent	Democrat
7/22-29/26	47	74	35	22
5/20-26/26	46	76	39	20
4/8-16/26	42	70	29	19
1/21-28/26	44	78	26	17
11/5-12/25	44	74	33	17
9/15-24/25	50	81	43	19
7/7-16/25	49	81	45	18
5/5-15/25	53	78	43	31
3/17-27/25	54	79	45	31
1/27-2/6/25	51	84	46	19
Marquette Law School Poll, National surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?

The survey was conducted July 22-29, 2026, interviewing 1,076 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.2 percentage points.

Both party and political ideology are related to approval of the Supreme Court. Republicans who consider themselves very conservative are more approving than Republicans who are not very conservative, while Democrats who describe themselves as very liberal are more disapproving than those Democrats who do not see themselves as very liberal. Independents fall between the parties, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Supreme Court approval, by party identification and ideology

Among adults

Party & ideology	Approval
	Approve	Disapprove
All adults	47	53
Republican, very conservative	84	16
Republican, not very conservative	70	30
Independent	35	65
Democrat, not very liberal	27	73
Democrat, very liberal	5	95
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?

The administration of President Donald Trump has been a frequent party to disputes before the Supreme Court during his second term, with the president also often commenting on the Court. Despite Trump’s criticisms of the Court and losses in some major decisions, approval of Trump is linked to approval of the Court.

Among Republicans who approve of how Trump is handling his job, 82% approve of the Supreme Court, while among Republicans who disapprove of Trump, 43% approve of the Court. There are too few independents and Democrats who approve of how Trump is handling his job to reliably estimate the analogous comparisons. Combining both independents and Democrats who approve of Trump, 75% approve of the Court, while among independents who disapprove of Trump 27% approve of the Court, and among Democrats who disapprove of Trump 17% approve of how the Court is handling its job.

Republicans are more likely to say the Court rules for Trump rarely or never than are independents. Among Democrats, more than 70% say the Court rules for Trump often or fairly often.

Among all adults, the percentage saying the Court rules for Trump often or fairly often declined from 61% in May to 55% in July, following the end of the Supreme Court term in which some prominent decisions rejected Trump administration arguments. Among Republicans, this fell from 45% to 37%, while independents rose slightly from 47% to 49% and Democrats declined slightly from 79% to 77%. These results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: How often Court rules for Trump, by party identification

Among adults

Poll dates	Court rules for Trump
	Often/Fairly often	Rarely/Never
All adults
7/22-29/26	55	45
5/20-26/26	61	39
Republican
7/22-29/26	37	63
5/20-26/26	45	55
Independent
7/22-29/26	49	51
5/20-26/26	47	53
Democrat
7/22-29/26	77	23
5/20-26/26	79	21
Marquette Law School Poll, National surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Since the beginning of his second term, how often do you think the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration in cases that have reached the Court?

Among Republicans, perceptions of how often the Court rules for the Trump administration is not related to approval of the Court, while approval of the Court rises among independents and Democrats who think the Court rarely or never sides with the administration, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Approval of the Court, by how often it rules for Trump and by party

Among adults

How often rules for Trump	Approval
	Approve	Disapprove
Republican
Often/Fairly often	74	26
Rarely/Never	74	26
Independent
Often/Fairly often	20	80
Rarely/Never	50	50
Democrat
Often/Fairly often	17	83
Rarely/Never	37	62
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?
Question: Since the beginning of his second term, how often do you think the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration in cases that have reached the Court?

Among all adults, 54% say the Court is going out of its way to avoid a ruling Trump might refuse to obey, while 46% say the Court is not avoiding such a decision. This perception has remained fairly stable through the second Trump term, though it declined 3 percentage points from May to July.

This perception of the Court varies substantially by party, with 32% of Republicans saying the Court is avoiding such a ruling, as do 55% of independents and 76% of Democrats. For independents and Democrats, this percentage declined 5 and 4 percentage points, respectively, from May to July. These results during the second Trump term are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Is Court avoiding ruling against Trump, by party identification

Among adults

Poll dates	Avoiding ruling
	All adults	Republican	Independent	Democrat
7/22-29/26	54	32	55	76
5/20-26/26	57	33	60	80
4/8-16/26	57	33	66	79
1/21-28/26	57	34	59	78
11/5-12/25	56	37	58	74
9/15-24/25	55	31	58	81
Marquette Law School Poll, National surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you think the U.S. Supreme Court is going out of its way to avoid making a ruling that President Donald Trump might refuse to obey?

The perception that the justices are motivated mainly by politics stands at 58% in July, with 42% saying the justices are mainly motivated by the law. The belief that politics is the main motivation rose by 6 percentage points from May to July. Partisanship plays a substantial role in this belief, with a majority of Republicans saying justices are motivated by the law, while majorities of independents and especially of Democrats say that politics is the main motivation. The perception that politics is the motive rose among all three partisan groups from May to July, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Motivation of justices’ decisions, by party identification

Among adults

Poll dates	Motivation
	Mainly politics	Mainly the law
All adults
7/22-29/26	58	42
5/20-26/26	52	48
Republican
7/22-29/26	43	57
5/20-26/26	36	64
Independent
7/22-29/26	59	41
5/20-26/26	57	43
Democrat
7/22-29/26	74	26
5/20-26/26	67	33
Marquette Law School Poll, National surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: In general, what most often motivates Supreme Court justices’ decisions?

Executive and congressional power

A number of cases in the October 2025 Supreme Court term and in recent years concern the extent of executive power over departments and independent agencies, as well as the ability of Congress to delegate decisions to agencies. Justice Neil Gorsuch has written in recent opinions about how difficult it can be for Congress to reclaim authority once it has been delegated. The Court has ruled for extensive presidential authority over the executive branch and independent agencies in the term that just ended. The public has some ideas about these issues.

A plurality of adults, 45%, say the next president should have less control over departments and agencies than today, with 36% saying the president should have about as much control as today and 18% saying he should have more control over the executive branch.

Partisans differ in their views of executive powers. Most Republicans favor current powers, though 25% say presidents should have more control. A plurality of independents, 46%, favor less control, as do 72% of Democrats, while 21% of independents and just 9% of Democrats favor more powers. These results are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Presidential control over agencies, by party identification

Among adults

Population	Presidential control
	More control over departments and agencies	Less control over departments and agencies	About as much control as today
All adults	18	45	36
Republican	25	20	55
Independent	21	46	33
Democrat	9	72	18
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Would you like to see the next president have (more) control over federal departments and agencies, (less) control or about as much control as the president has today?

A majority of adults, and majorities of each party, say that Congress has failed to do its job over the last 25 years, giving up too many powers to the president and avoiding making hard decisions. Among all adults, 31% say Congress has done its job, while 69% say it has given up too much power. A slight majority of Republicans, 52%, say Congress has given up too much power, while 77% of independents and 85% of Democrats say the same. These results are shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Has Congress done its job, by party identification

Among adults

Population	Congress done its job
	Done its job	Given up powers to the president and executive branch
All adults	31	69
Republican	48	52
Independent	23	77
Democrat	15	85
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Thinking about the last 25 years, do you think Congress has done its job by passing legislation, such as spending, taxing and setting policies, or has it given up too many of those powers to the president and the executive branch to avoid making hard decisions?

While a majority think Congress has given up too much power, 58% think it can take back some of the powers it has delegated while 42% say it is practically impossible for Congress to take this authority back. Majorities of each partisan group think Congress can recover its powers. The range of opinion across parties is more modest here than in the perception that Congress has given up too much power in the previous table. Table 9 shows these results.

Table 9: Can Congress take back powers, by party identification

Among adults

Population	Take back power
	Congress can take back powers it delegated	Practically impossible for Congress to take them back
All adults	58	42
Republican	55	45
Independent	54	46
Democrat	63	37
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you think the Congress can take back some of the powers it delegated to regulatory agencies and the executive branch, or do you think once those powers are delegated, it is practically impossible for Congress to take them back?

In this national survey, 73% think the next president should be less able to make policy without congressional authorization. This has majority support across parties, but with a wide variation. Among Republicans, 55% say the next president should be less able to act without Congress, while 78% of independents and 91% of Democrats agree, as shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Presidential policy making without Congress, by party identification

Among adults

Population	Presidential policy making
	More able to make policy without Congress	Less able to act without Congress
All adults	27	73
Republican	45	55
Independent	21	78
Democrat	9	91
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Compared to the last four presidents, do you think the next president should be more able to make policy without needing the consent of Congress, or should the next president be less able to act without congressional authorization?

The public is divided on whether it is a bigger problem for Congress to fail to act on national issues or for presidents to act without congressional consent. Fifty-seven percent say Congress failing to act is the bigger problem, while 43% say presidential action without congressional agreement is more of a problem. Here the parties are divided, with 75% of Republicans saying Congress failing to act is the bigger problem, while 59% of Democrats say presidential action without Congress is the bigger problem. Independents are nearly evenly divided. These opinions are shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Congress fails to act or president who acts without Congress, by party identification

Among adults

Population	Which is bigger problem
	A Congress that fails to act	A president who acts without the consent of Congress
All adults	57	43
Republican	75	25
Independent	52	48
Democrat	41	59
Marquette Law School Poll, National survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Which do you think is a bigger problem, (a Congress that fails to act to address national issues) or (a president who acts on national issues without the consent of Congress)?

Public attention to the Court and its decisions

The public pays modest attention to the Supreme Court, in comparison to the president or Congress, though the amount of attention varies across decisions. Of four major rulings in June:

• Birthright citizenship was most visible to the public, with 40% saying they read or heard a lot about this decision. Just 15% say they had heard nothing about it.
• A decision that states can limit transgender athletes from playing on women’s and girls’ teams was almost as visible, with 37% hearing a lot and 15% nothing at all.
• Attention falls off for the decision that states can allow the counting of absentee ballots postmarked by election day but arriving after election day, a decision that 21% heard a lot about and 29% heard nothing at all.
• Similarly, 20% heard a lot about the decision that presidents can remove the heads of independent agencies and 37% heard nothing about this case.

For comparison, 28% say they heard a lot about the Supreme Court in the last month, and 15% say they heard nothing. This range of attention is shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Attention to Court topics in the news

Among adults

Item	Heard or read
	A lot	A little	Nothing at all
Birthright citizenship decision	40	45	15
States can limit transgender athletes decision	37	49	15
Heard about Court in last month	28	57	15
Late arriving ballots decision	21	50	29
Removal of heads of independent agencies decision	20	43	37
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Thinking about the last month only, how much have you heard or read about the U.S. Supreme Court?

Awareness of Court decisions and of the Court itself varies by the sources people say they rely on for news and public affairs information. This variation is likely due to both the different content across sources and to the self-selected audiences who gravitate to news sources they find congenial. In this case, those more engaged by politics may also pick certain news sources while those less engaged may prefer different outlets.

For attention to the Supreme Court over the last month, the audiences for MS Now (formerly MSNBC), Newsmax, and the BBC are the most likely to say they have heard a lot about the Court, with more than 45% of each saying so. At the opposite end of awareness, the audiences for local radio, local TV news, and those who depend on social media have heard the least, with 33% or less of each saying they heard a lot about the Court.

A similar pattern appears for the four Court decisions, but with considerable variation across cases, and moderate to large differences across news sources within each case. The highest attention to the birthright citizenship case was among the audiences of MS Now, Newsmax, and the BBC, each with 58% or more hearing a lot. The local news audiences were also at the bottom of awareness of this decision. Among the major broadcast networks and Fox News audiences, 46% to 53% said they had heard a lot about this case.

The transgender athletes case shows a somewhat different pattern, with 63% of the Newsmax audience hearing a lot, while 48% of the MS Now and 44% of the BBC audiences heard a lot. Among the major network audiences, 50% of Fox viewers heard a lot, while between 37% and 42% of the audiences of ABC, CBS, and NBC heard a lot.

The less visible cases on late-arriving ballots and independent agencies show less variation across news sources, though the MS Now audience was most likely to hear a lot about both cases, with the BBC and Newsmax audiences a bit behind it.

Table 13 shows the amount read or heard about each case by news source. The lighter colors indicate more attention by the news source’s audience while darker shades indicate less exposure to the decision.

Public views of recent Supreme Court decisions

Of the 13 rulings by the Supreme Court this term included in the survey, a majority of the public favors the Court’s decisions in 11 cases and opposes the rulings in two. The degree of support for the Court varies substantially across cases, from 81% favoring the ruling that limits police access to cell phone location data, to 66% favoring the ruling that Trump may not impose tariffs under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, and 51% favoring the decision allowing the Trump administration to restrict asylum seekers. Narrow majorities opposed the decision that allows the president to remove the heads of independent agencies, 51%, and the ruling that permits political parties to coordinate with candidate campaigns, 53%. Eight of the 13 rulings were favored by at least 60% of the public. All of these cases are shown in Table 14.

Table 14: Favor or oppose Court’s decisions

Among adults

Item	Favor or oppose
	Favor	Oppose
Limit police access to cell phone location data	81	19
President may not remove member of Federal Reserve	70	30
Rejected Trump appeal of $5M E. Jean Caroll verdict	66	34
Trump may not impose tariffs under IEEPA	66	34
States may ban transgender athletes in women’s sports	65	35
Uphold birthright citizenship	63	37
Allow counting late-arriving ballots	62	38
Federal law may not ban guns for drug user	61	39
Voting Rights Act does not require minority-majority districts	53	47
State may not ban conversion therapy	53	47
Allow restrictions on asylum seekers	51	49
President may remove heads of independent agencies	49	51
Allow parties to coordinate with candidate campaigns	47	53
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey: July 22-29, 2026
Question: See full question wordings at the end of this release

Partisanship plays a substantial role in how citizens see Supreme Court decisions, with partisan agreement in some cases but substantial disagreement in other cases. For example, majorities of each partisan group favor the decision to limit access to cell phone locations, the most popular of the 13 decisions. A much larger divide appears on the president’s ability to remove a member of the Federal Reserve Board, a decision that a bare majority of Republicans favor, 51%, but that larger majorities of independents, 67%, and of Democrats, 91%, favor.

In some cases, the partisan divide is a chasm, as on allowing the Trump administration to restrict asylum seekers, on which 81% of Republicans favor the ruling and just 22% of Democrats do so. Where Trump or the Trump administration is a party to the case, the partisan gap tends to be large, although, in a number of cases where the Court ruled against the administration’s position, sizable minorities of Republicans, 39% or more, favored the decision. Examples include rejecting Trump’s appeal of the E. Jean Caroll verdict and the rulings on tariffs and birthright citizenship.

Opinions of these cases by partisanship are shown in Table 15. Lighter colors indicate more support for the decision while darker colors indicate less support.

Public views of the justices

The justices of the Supreme Court are far from household names for most Americans. Asked whether they have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of each justice, between 41% and 69% say they haven’t heard enough to have an opinion of that justice. Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and Sonia Sotomayor are the best known, while Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Elena Kagan are the least known. Chief Justice John Roberts is not familiar to 60% of American adults.

The justices with more favorable than unfavorable opinions come from the “liberal” side of the bench, Sotomayor, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Kagan, while the six “conservative” justices are seen either more unfavorably than favorably or, in the cases of Roberts and Gorsuch, are seen equally favorably and unfavorably. The current views of the justices are shown in Table 16.

Table 16: Favorable and unfavorable ratings of justices

Among adults

Date	Favorability
	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Clarence Thomas	28	31	41
Brett Kavanaugh	22	27	51
Sonia Sotomayor	29	19	52
Ketanji Brown Jackson	23	20	57
Amy Coney Barrett	18	24	58
John Roberts	20	20	60
Samuel Alito	19	20	61
Neil Gorsuch	16	16	68
Elena Kagan	19	13	69
Marquette Law School Poll, National surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Some justices of the Supreme Court are better known than others. For each of these names, have you never heard of them, heard of them but don’t know enough to have an opinion of them, have a favorable opinion or have an unfavorable opinion?

Despite the limited visibility of the justices, there has been some evolution in perceptions of them since the Marquette Law School Poll first started asking about them in 2019. In some cases, such as Alito, both favorable and unfavorable opinions have increased, with unfavorable views growing to roughly equal favorable opinion. Justice Amy Coney Barrett has seen decline in both favorable and unfavorable opinion. Kavanaugh has seen a similar decline in both positive and negative views. Roberts has seen a convergence of opinion, from initially having considerably higher favorable than unfavorable ratings to declining favorable and rising unfavorable views, which are now close to equal. Thomas has also gone from initially having more favorable than unfavorable opinions to the reverse. These trends in views of the justices are shown in Figure 2.

While the justices are less familiar to the public than many political figures, the public nonetheless views them through partisan lenses. Democrats consistently have net positive favorability to the three liberal members of the Court, while Republicans are consistently net positive toward the six conservative justices. The degrees of partisan division over the justices vary, with larger divisions over Kavanaugh and Thomas, and, to a lesser degree, over Sotomayor, while Chief Justice Roberts shows the least partisan differences. In Alito’s case, the partisan divide has widened, while in Barrett’s case the partisans have moved somewhat closer. For other justices, partisan divides have remained relatively constant since 2019. These opinions are shown in Figure 3.

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted July 22-29, 2026, interviewing 1,076 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.2 percentage points.

Wording of questions about recent Supreme Court decisions: These items do not attempt to exactly frame the particular issues in specific cases but rather address the topic in more general terms. The questions were worded as follows:

• In June, the Supreme Court held that children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the country are U.S. citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, in two cases the Supreme Court interpreted federal law to allow restrictions favored by the Trump administration on those seeking asylum in the United States. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?

• In June, the Supreme Court upheld a state law that permits the counting of mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received up to five days later. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, the Supreme Court struck down a federal law limiting the amount of money that political parties can spend in coordination with a candidate for office, as a violation of the First Amendment. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In April, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 generally does not require states to create congressional districts where nonwhite voters are in the majority, and that Louisiana’s having done so to protect the ability of Blacks to elect candidates of their choice therefore was a racial gerrymander violating the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, the Supreme Court overruled a 1935 precedent and held that federal laws barring the president from removing members of federal regulatory agencies, like the Federal Trade Commission, except for cause, violate the constitutional separation of powers. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, the Supreme Court rejected President Trump’s request to overturn a lower court order that prevented him from removing a member of the Federal Reserve board of governors. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In February, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump did not have the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, the Supreme Court held that a federal law making it a felony for any “unlawful user” of illegal drugs to have a gun is a violation of the Second Amendment. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating on girls’ and women’s sports teams do not violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• A Colorado law restricts mental health therapists from trying to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of clients under age 18, often called “conversion therapy.” In March, the Supreme Court ruled that Colorado’s law banning conversion therapy, as applied to talk therapy, regulates speech based on viewpoint, and the lower courts erred by failing to apply sufficiently rigorous First Amendment scrutiny. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• In June, the Supreme Court held that an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in information about their cell phone’s location, and police have to comply with the Fourth Amendment’s limitations in demanding that information from a tech company. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?
• The Supreme Court announced that it will not hear an appeal by President Donald Trump seeking review of the $5 million jury verdict entered against him in the sexual abuse and defamation case filed by journalist E. Jean Carroll. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on national political topics) were released on Aug. 5. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available on the Marquette Law School Poll website.

Also:

• Concern over Iran war has declined even as assessments of the war have turned more negative
• Views of the cost of living, personal well-being, and the economy are negative, though slightly improved from May
• President Trump’s overall job approval rises 2 points since June, but approval of Trump’s work on inflation, the economy, Iran war, and gas prices at 30% or less
• Democrats have a slight lead on the generic congressional vote among registered voters but a larger advantage with likely voters
• Opinion of Israel and of military aid to Israel is negative, especially among younger adults and Democrats
• People continue to oppose data centers and think AI will be bad for society

MILWAUKEE — A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds inflation and the cost of living is rated the most important issue by 35% of the public. This has been the top issue for the public in each Marquette poll this year.

The national economy is the next highest rated, with 15% saying it is the most important issue. The war with Iran is chosen by 10%, a decline from April, when 24% said it was the most important issue. Medicare and Social Security is tied for fourth place with the proposed SAVE America Act dealing with voting procedures, at 9% each. A three-way tie then follows, at 5% each, among health care, immigration and border security, and affordability of housing; the rating of immigration and border security has declined from 14% in January. Rounding out the list, crime is most important to 2% and abortion policy to 1% of adults.

The full list, for each poll this year, is shown in Table 1. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)

Table 1: Most important issue

Among adults

Issue
	July	May	April	January
Inflation and the cost of living	35	37	30	38
The economy	15	19	15	17
The war between Iran, Israel and the United States	10	16	24	NA
Medicare & Social Security	9	7	6	9
The proposed SAVE America Act	9	NA	NA	NA
Health care	5	5	5	8
Immigration and border security	5	6	7	14
Affordability of housing	5	NA	NA	NA
Crime	2	2	3	2
Abortion policy	1	2	2	3
The size of the federal deficit	NA	2	3	3
The war between Russia and Ukraine	NA	NA	NA	1
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Which one of the following issues matters MOST to you right now?

The survey was conducted July 22-29, 2026, interviewing 1,076 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.2 percentage points. For registered voters, the sample size is 886, with a margin of error of +/-3.5. For likely voters, the sample size is 572, with a margin of error of +/-4.4 percentage points.

The importance of economic issues is apparent when considering what issue people consider their second-most important issue. Once more, inflation and the cost of living, and the economy, top the list of second-most important issues, with the Iran war remaining ranked third on the list. Concern for health care moves up to 11% as the second-greatest concern. Other issues remain in single digits, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Most important and second-most important issue

Among adults

Issue
	Most important	2nd most important
Inflation and the cost of living	35	21
The economy	15	18
The war between Iran, Israel and the United States	10	14
Medicare & Social Security	9	8
The proposed SAVE America Act	9	4
Health care	5	11
Immigration and border security	5	8
Affordability of housing	5	8
Crime	2	3
Abortion policy	1	3
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Which one of the following issues matters MOST to you right now?
Question: And which is the second-most important issue to you right now?

Changes in multiple measures of economic circumstances since January explain why the cost of living and concern over the economy continue to top the list of most important concerns. Most of these measures also show slight improvements from May to July, although on all measures circumstances are worse than they were in January. An exception to small recent improvement is family financial situation, which worsened from May to July.

Increases in the price of groceries and gasoline are important elements affecting the cost of living, with perceived prices rising over the past six months. Gasoline prices have been especially volatile since the start of the Iran war. In January, prior to the start of the war, 50% said gas prices had gone down either a lot or a little, and only 7% said they had gone up a lot. This changed dramatically in April, with 75% saying gas prices had gone up a lot, and only 2% thinking they had gone down. Perception of rising gas prices peaked in May, with 80% saying they were up a lot. In July, a smaller percentage of people (57%) said prices were up a lot over the last six months, with 11% saying the prices were stable and 8% saying prices had declined. These perceptions track with average prices reported by AAA, which show prices declining from May through early July, though with a new surge in prices as this survey was commencing interviews.

Perception of grocery prices has not been as volatile as for gasoline, but in July, 48% say grocery prices are up a lot over the last 6 months, with 31% saying they are up a little, 15% saying they are stable and 6% thinking they have gone down.

In total on these cost-of-living measures, 81% say the price at the pump is up a little or a lot, and 79% say the price of groceries at the checkout line is up a little or a lot. The perceptions of prices are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Change in price of gasoline and groceries

Among adults

Poll dates	Price change
	Gone down a lot	Gone down a little	Stayed about the same	Gone up a little	Gone up a lot
Gasoline
7/22-29/26	1	7	11	24	57
5/20-26/26	1	1	3	15	80
4/8-16/26	1	1	5	18	75
1/21-28/26	14	36	29	14	7
Groceries
7/22-29/26	1	5	15	31	48
5/20-26/26	1	3	11	32	53
4/8-16/26	1	3	14	32	50
1/21-28/26	2	9	19	30	40
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: How has the price you pay for gasoline changed over the last six months?
Question: How has the price you pay for groceries changed over the last six months?

The public has pessimistic expectations of inflation over the next 12 months, with 69% saying inflation will increase, 19% saying it will remain the same, and 13% expecting a decline. Over the course of 2026, the percentage expecting an increase in inflation rose from January through May, with a slight reduction in July, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Outlook for inflation in next 12 months

Among adults

Poll dates	Change in inflation
	Increase	Stay about the same	Decrease
7/22-29/26	69	19	13
5/20-26/26	71	16	13
4/8-16/26	70	18	13
1/21-28/26	61	19	19
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Over the next 12 months do you think inflation and the cost of living will increase, decrease or stay about the same?

The percentage saying they are better off than a year ago has declined from 28% in January to 19% in July, with those saying their circumstances are about the same as a year ago rising from 37% to 44%. Those saying they are worse off show a small increase from 34% to 37%. This measure of well-being is shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Better or worse off than a year ago

Among adults

Poll dates	Better or worse
	Better	About the same	Worse
7/22-29/26	19	44	37
5/20-26/26	19	39	41
4/8-16/26	20	42	38
1/21-28/26	28	37	34
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Would you say you personally are better off, about the same, or worse off than you were a year ago?

People’s description of their family’s financial situation took a negative turn in July, with the percent saying they are living comfortably declining 10 percentage points from 43% in June to 33% in late July. The total is down 7 percentage points since January. Those saying they are struggling also increased to 21% in July, up 6 points from both June and January. Those just getting by has remained relatively stable over Marquette Law School Poll surveys this year, with 46% just getting by in July. These trends are shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Family financial situation

Among adults

Poll dates	Financial situation
	Living comfortably	Just getting by	Struggling
7/22-29/26	33	46	21
6/9-15/26	43	42	15
5/20-26/26	36	45	18
4/8-16/26	35	46	19
1/21-28/26	40	45	15
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Thinking about your family’s financial situation, would you say you are living comfortably, just getting by, or struggling to make ends meet?

Views of the national economy improved slightly from May to July, though they are more negative than in January. In July, 28% say the economy is excellent or good, up from 26% in May but down from 35% in January. Those saying the economy is not so good rose by 1 percentage point from 45% in May to 46% in July. That is up from 40% in January. Those saying the economy is poor rose from January through May, but declined 4 points to 26% in July, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7: State of the economy

Among adults

Poll dates	Economy
	Excellent/Good	Not so good	Poor
7/22-29/26	28	46	26
5/20-26/26	26	45	30
4/8-16/26	25	46	30
1/21-28/26	35	40	25
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: How would you describe the state of the nation’s economy these days?

Concern for health care is well down the list of most important problems, though it rises to fourth place among the second-most important problems. The expiration of federal tax credits for insurance purchased through Affordable Care Act exchanges is unpopular with the public. Sixty-nine percent say the tax credits should have been extended, while 31% say Congress should have let them expire. Opinion on this has been stable since January, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Affordable Care Act tax credit extension

Among adults

Poll dates	Extend credits
	Extend the increased credits	Let the credits expire
7/22-29/26	69	31
5/20-26/26	71	29
1/21-28/26	71	28
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: In 2021 Congress increased tax credits that help reduce the cost of health insurance purchased through the Affordable Care Act’s marketplace. Those increased credits expired at the end of 2025. Do you think Congress should extend the increased credits, or should not extend them?

War with Iran

The July Marquette Law School survey finds a public deeply unhappy with the war with Iran. While the percentage of people rating the war as their top concern declined from 24% in April to 10% in July, this has not been accompanied by a more positive view of the war.

Just 12% say the United States has achieved its goals in the Iran war, which is down from 21% in April, while 88% say the goals have not been achieved. Here the public has become steadily less positive in each poll since April, as shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Has U.S. achieved its goals in war with Iran

Among adults

Poll dates	Achieved goals
	Has achieved its goals	Has not achieved its goals
7/22-29/26	12	88
5/20-26/26	18	81
4/8-16/26	21	78
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Has the U.S. achieved its goals in the Iran war?

Seventy-five percent say the Iran war has not been worth the cost, with 25% saying it is worth the cost. This is a slight change from May, as shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Has the Iran war been with the cost

Among adults

Poll dates	War worth the cost
	Worth the cost	Not worth the cost
7/22-29/26	25	75
5/20-26/26	28	72
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Has the Iran war been worth the cost?

Perception of the degree to which Iran has increased or decreased control over the Strait of Hormuz is less lopsided, with 41% saying Iran has more control than before the war, while 30% think it has less control and 29% say control over the strait has not changed. This question, which has not been previously asked, is shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Does Iran have more or less control of Strait of Hormuz

Among adults

Poll dates	Amount of control
	More control	Less control	Hasn’t been any change
7/22-29/26	41	30	29
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Compared to before the war with Iran began, do you think Iran now has (more) control over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, or (less) control over shipping or hasn’t there been any change?

The on-again-off-again bombing campaign against Iran, together with Iran’s strikes against U.S. and allied targets, is seen as making a peace agreement less likely by 72% of adults, while 28% think the bombing can improve chances of a peace agreement. Table 12 shows these results.

Table 12: Does renewed bombing make peace agreement more or less likely

Among adults

Poll dates	More or less likely
	Make an agreement more likely	Make an agreement less likely
7/22-29/26	28	72
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: In July, Iran and the United States resumed missile and bombing attacks over control of the Strait of Hormuz. Do you think this renewed fighting will make peace negotiations more likely to reach an agreement, or will the fighting make an agreement less likely?

Presidential approval

The modest improvements in most economic perceptions, including gas and grocery prices, from May to July is accompanied by a modest improvement in approval of how President Donald Trump is handling his job as president. In July, 40% approve and 60% disapprove of how Trump is doing as president. In May, 38% approved and 62% disapproved.

Trump’s approval declined steadily throughout his second term until this improvement in July. His rating started at 48% approval and 52% disapproval in February 2025, with approval falling to the high 30s from April through June, as shown in Table 13.

Table 13: Trump approval

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Approve	Disapprove
7/22-29/26	40	60
6/9-15/26	38	62
5/20-26/26	38	62
4/8-16/26	39	60
1/21-28/26	42	58
11/5-12/25	43	57
9/15-24/25	43	57
7/7-16/25	45	55
5/5-15/25	46	54
3/17-27/25	46	54
1/27-2/6/25	48	52
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: [Donald Trump] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

The strength with which people approve of Trump has declined through his second term, from 29% strongly approving at the start of his term to 15% in July. Those somewhat approving increased from 19% to 25%. On the disapproval side, there has been a slight increase in somewhat disapproving, as well an increase in strongly disapproving from 40% to 45%, as shown in Table 14. Note the percentages in this table don’t exactly match the previous table due to rounding.

Table 14: Trump strength of approval and disapproval

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Strongly approve	Somewhat approve	Somewhat disapprove	Strongly disapprove
7/22-29/26	15	25	14	45
6/9-15/26	16	22	15	47
5/20-26/26	16	22	17	45
4/8-16/26	17	22	12	48
1/21-28/26	19	23	14	44
11/5-12/25	21	22	13	44
9/15-24/25	23	20	16	40
7/7-16/25	23	22	11	44
5/5-15/25	24	22	13	41
3/17-27/25	26	20	13	41
1/27-2/6/25	29	19	12	40
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: [Donald Trump] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Approval of how Trump is handling specific issues varies from relatively high approval on border security and immigration to very low approval ratings on inflation and gas prices. Approval has trended downward on all these issues since early in his second term, with less decline on the border and immigration issues and sharper declines on the economy and inflation. Approval of Trump’s handling of foreign policy and tariffs has also declined, while views of his handling of the Iran war and gas prices are too recent to have clear trends. These trends in approval are shown in Figure 1 and in Table 15.

Table 15: Trump approval ratings

Among adults

Date	Approval percentage
	Overall job approval	The economy	Inflation & cost of living	Immigration	Border security	Tariffs	War with Iran	Gas prices	Foreign policy
7/22-29/26	40	30	24	44	52	33	30	21	37
6/9-15/26	38	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
5/20-26/26	38	30	22	44	48	32	33	19	38
4/8-16/26	39	32	24	44	52	34	32	NA	NA
1/21-28/26	42	38	30	44	53	37	NA	NA	NA
11/5-12/25	43	36	28	45	54	37	NA	NA	NA
9/15-24/25	43	40	29	46	55	38	NA	NA	NA
7/7-16/25	45	43	35	47	54	35	NA	NA	43
5/5-15/25	46	42	34	50	56	37	NA	NA	43
3/17-27/25	46	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
1/27-2/6/25	48	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Marquette Law School Poll, National surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling each of the following issues?

Approval of Trump’s handling of his job varies dramatically in line with the news sources to which people turn, due to both the content and the self-selected audience of each news organization. The audience of Newsmax gives the president an 85% job approval rating, followed by the Fox News audience at 68% approval. Among those who get news from podcasts, 58% approve of Trump. All other news source audiences give approval ratings below 50%, ranging from 47% for listeners of local radio to 14% approval from the MS Now (formerly MSNBC) audience. This wide range is a clear portrayal of how much news audiences are segmented along partisan lines. The full results are shown in Table 16.

Table 16: Trump approval, by news source

Among adults

News source	Approval
	Monthly audience	Approve	Disapprove
Among all adults	NA	40	60
Newsmax	6	85	15
Fox news	29	68	32
Podcasts	10	58	42
Local radio station	24	47	53
Local TV news	51	41	59
Social media	41	39	61
Local newspaper	26	35	65
CBS News	17	34	66
NBC News	18	29	71
ABC News	21	28	72
National newspapers	15	26	74
CNN	20	23	77
BBC	11	22	78
NPR/PBS	16	20	80
MS Now (MSNBC)	9	14	86
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey July 22-29, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
Question: Which of the following, if any, have you read, watched, or listened to in the past month for information about political news and current affairs?

As the ranking of inflation as the most important issue has remained the public’s top concern, views of the effects of Trump’s policies on inflation have turned sharply down since his election in 2024. In December 2024, before he returned to office, 41% thought Trump’s policies would decrease inflation. This has declined to 21% in July, while the number of those thinking his policies increase inflation has climbed from 45% in late 2024 to 61% in July. These changes are shown in Table 17.

Table 17: Effect of Trump policies on inflation

Among adults

Poll dates	Effect on inflation
	Decrease inflation	Increase inflation	Have no effect on inflation
7/22-29/26	21	61	18
5/20-26/26	22	61	18
4/8-16/26	23	62	15
1/21-28/26	25	60	15
11/5-12/25	27	60	13
9/15-24/25	25	60	15
7/7-16/25	28	60	12
5/5-15/25	28	61	10
3/17-27/25	30	58	12
1/27-2/6/25	36	49	15
12/2-11/24	41	45	14
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you think Trump’s policy proposals will decrease inflation, increase inflation, or have no effect on inflation?

While approval of Trump’s handling of most specific issues, including inflation and the economy, has declined through the second term, general trust in him to make the right decisions for the country has shifted by only 5 percentage points, from 45% in May 2025 to 40% in July. The percentage of people who do not trust his decisions has risen from 55% to 60%. These numbers are in keeping with his overall job approval rating. This is shown in Table 18.

Table 18: Trust Trump to make the right decisions for the country

Among adults

Poll dates	Trust Trump’s decisions
	Completely/mostly trust	Completely/mostly do not trust
7/22-29/26	40	60
5/20-26/26	40	60
4/8-16/26	39	61
11/5-12/25	42	58
9/15-24/25	43	57
7/7-16/25	45	55
5/5-15/25	45	55
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Regardless of specific policies, how much do you trust Donald Trump to make the right decisions for the country?

Topics in the news

In July, the public was hearing the most news about the war with Iran, closely followed by the World Cup, with 69% and 67% respectively hearing a lot about these two topics. Less than 10% heard nothing about either.

For other topics, much less news was consumed. Thirty-four percent heard a lot about the end of Graham Platner’s campaign for the Senate in Maine, and 33% heard a lot about the SAVE America Act, which Trump has attempted to get passed by Congress. Attention falls to 28% who heard a lot about the Trump family making some $2.2 billion in 2025. Of the bipartisan congressional achievement, passing a housing bill, only 20% heard a lot, as Trump cancelled a signing ceremony and ultimately let the bill become law without his signature. The bill had been expected to be a centerpiece achievement cited in congressional campaigns in the fall, but 45% heard nothing at all about it. These results are shown in Table 19.

Table 19: Attention to topics in the news

Among adults

Item	Heard or read
	A lot	A little	Nothing at all
The U.S. war with Iran	69	26	5
The World Cup	67	25	8
Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner withdrew from the race following reports he sexually assaulted a woman in 2021	34	29	37
The proposed SAVE America Act	33	36	31
Reports that the Trump family made $2.2 billion in 2025	28	31	40
Congress passed a housing bill which President Trump declined to sign, but did not veto, so the bill became law	20	35	45
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Here are some recent topics in the news. How much have you heard or read about each of these?

Which topics receive a lot of attention varies with news source. Regardless of news source, the Iran war and the World Cup were much more visible to the public than any of the other topics. Still, in some instances, there was little variation across source; for example, 90% of the MS Now audience heard a lot about the Iran war, as did 87% of the Newsmax audience. These two audiences are far apart in Table 16 in approval of Trump but are very close when it comes to attention to the Iran war coverage and some other topics. Audiences for local TV news, Fox News, local radio, and social media heard less about the war. The audiences heard similar amounts about the World Cup regardless of source, with the notable exception that viewers of the BBC said they heard the most.

There is more variation in the amount heard about other topics across news sources.

• Trump family income reports were most likely to be heard by the MS Now audience, and least likely to be heard by the Fox News audience, with quite a bit of variation in between.
• Platner’s withdrawal received the most attention from the audiences of MS Now and Newsmax, and least from those getting their news from social media.
• The housing bill received little attention by the audiences for every news source. The most attention was among the MS Now audience, with the Fox News and social media audiences hearing the least.
• Attention to the SAVE Act varies considerably, with audiences of Newsmax and MS Now hearing the most and social media the least.

These data are shown in Table 20, with the cells shaded to make differences more apparent.

Congressional generic ballot

In the November congressional elections among registered voters, 46% say they will vote for the Democratic candidate and 44% for the Republican candidate. Among likely voters, those who say they are certain they will vote, the Democratic advantage expands to 51% to 45% for the Republican candidate. This difference between registered and likely voters has been a persistent feature of the congressional vote throughout the year, with variation in the size of the margins, as seen in Table 21.

Table 21: Congressional generic ballot

Among registered and likely voters

Poll dates	Generic ballot
	Dem minus Rep margin	Democratic candidate	Republican candidate	Neither	Would not vote
Registered voters
7/22-29/26	2	46	44	8	2
6/9-15/26	2	47	45	6	2
5/20-26/26	1	46	45	7	1
4/8-16/26	4	48	44	6	1
1/21-28/26	4	48	44	7	1
Likely voters
7/22-29/26	6	51	45	4	0
6/9-15/26	8	53	45	2	0
5/20-26/26	1	49	48	4	0
4/8-16/26	10	53	43	4	0
1/21-28/26	7	52	45	3	0
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: If the election for Congress were held today, would you vote for the (Democratic) candidate in your district or the (Republican) candidate in your district?

Partisan differences in reported certainty of voting account for the differences in vote percentages for Democrats and Republicans. In the July poll, 70% of Democrats say they are certain to vote, compared to 65% of Republicans and just 40% of independents. These differences have been present in each Marquette Law School Poll survey conducted in 2026 but have varied in size, as shown in Table 22.

Table 22: Likelihood of voting (turnout gap)

Among registered voters

Party ID	Likelihood of voting
	Absolutely certain to vote	Very likely to vote	Chances are 50-50	Don’t think will vote
7/22-29/26
Republican	65	21	12	2
Independent	40	22	23	13
Democrat	70	16	11	2
6/9-15/26
Republican	68	16	12	4
Independent	38	25	21	14
Democrat	76	14	8	3
5/20-26/26
Republican	70	18	10	1
Independent	38	28	26	8
Democrat	72	20	8	0
4/8-16/26
Republican	65	20	11	4
Independent	33	25	32	9
Democrat	77	14	8	1
1/21-28/26
Republican	70	18	11	1
Independent	41	26	26	7
Democrat	72	17	7	4
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: What are the chances that you will vote in the November 2026 general election for congressional and state offices– are you absolutely certain to vote, very likely to vote, are the chances 50-50, or don’t you think you will vote?

Similarly, Democrats report greater enthusiasm about the November elections than do Republicans or independents. This enthusiasm also boosts the likelihood of voting and is giving Democrats an edge in the upcoming vote. As with certainty of voting, the enthusiasm gap has varied across polls this year and may shift more as general election campaigns come to dominate advertising and news in the fall. The changes in enthusiasm by party are shown in Table 23.

Table 23: Enthusiastic to vote

Among registered voters

Party ID	Enthusiasm
	Very enthusiastic	Somewhat enthusiastic	Not too enthusiastic	Not at all enthusiastic
7/22-29/26
Republican	30	37	28	5
Independent	10	36	39	15
Democrat	38	35	22	4
5/20-26/26
Republican	36	38	20	6
Independent	13	30	31	25
Democrat	44	31	21	4
4/8-16/26
Republican	33	38	23	7
Independent	13	28	47	12
Democrat	50	29	17	3
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: How enthusiastic are you about voting in the elections this November for congressional and state offices?

Views of the parties

Approval of how each party is handling its job in Congress is substantially negative, as it has been all year, with 37% approving of the Republican Party’s performance and 34% approving of the Democrats. Republican approval has held steady since April, while Democratic approval has edged up slightly over the year, as shown in Table 24.

Table 24: Congressional party approval

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Net approval	Approve	Disapprove
Republicans in Congress
7/22-29/26	-26	37	63
5/20-26/26	-26	37	63
4/8-16/26	-25	37	62
1/21-28/26	-21	39	60
Democrats in Congress
7/22-29/26	-32	34	66
5/20-26/26	-40	30	70
4/8-16/26	-39	30	69
1/21-28/26	-42	29	71
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way (Republicans)(Democrats) in Congress are handling their job?

Favorability ratings of the parties show similarly negative ratings for both parties, though favorable ratings of the Republican Party have been quite stable through the year. Favorable views of the Democratic Party have increased modestly, reducing the size of the Republican advantage in net favorability since January, as shown in Table 25.

Table 25: Party favorability

Among adults

Poll dates	Favorability
	Net favorable	Favorable	Unfavorable
The Republican Party
7/22-29/26	-19	39	58
5/20-26/26	-22	38	60
4/8-16/26	-20	38	58
1/21-28/26	-19	38	57
The Democratic Party
7/22-29/26	-23	37	60
5/20-26/26	-25	36	61
4/8-16/26	-28	34	62
1/21-28/26	-30	33	63
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you have a. favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

About a quarter of adults have unfavorable views of both parties. This percentage has varied modestly over the second Trump term, from a low of 22% to a high of 29%, standing at 25% in July. In each survey except one, more voters have been favorable to the Republicans and unfavorable to the Democrats than have been positive to Democrats and negative to Republicans. A small percentage say they like both parties. These results are shown in Table 26.

Table 26: Dislike of both parties

Among adults

Poll dates	Views of both parties
	Fav Dem, Fav Rep	Fav Dem, Unfav Rep	Unfav Dem, Fav Rep	Unfav Dem, Unfav Rep
7/22-29/26	4	32	35	25
5/20-26/26	5	30	32	29
4/8-16/26	5	28	33	29
1/21-28/26	3	29	35	27
11/5-12/25	4	35	35	22
9/15-24/25	6	27	37	27
7/7-16/25	6	27	34	28
5/5-15/25	4	27	37	26
3/17-27/25	8	26	38	24
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Favorability to the MAGA movement has declined through Trump’s second term, with unfavorable views rising. Thirty-five percent have favorable views of MAGA, a little worse than Trump’s 40% job approval, and just slightly worse than the 38% who have a favorable view of Trump. The percentage is also below the 39% favorability of the Republican Party. The results are shown in Table 27.

Table 27: Favorability to MAGA

Among adults

Poll dates	Favorability
	Net favorable	Favorable	Unfavorable
7/22-29/26	-26	35	61
5/20-26/26	-27	35	62
4/8-16/26	-28	34	62
1/21-28/26	-25	35	60
11/5-12/25	-18	39	57
9/15-24/25	-21	37	58
7/7-16/25	-19	38	57
5/5-15/25	-15	40	55
3/17-27/25	-14	41	55
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: [The MAGA movement} Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

The rise of democratic socialist candidates in Democratic primaries this year has boosted the prominence of this political identification. Previous Marquette Law School Poll surveys have found that almost a third of adults say they don’t know enough about the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) organization to say if they have a favorable or unfavorable view. This fell to 22% without an opinion in the July poll, following recent democratic socialist victories in primaries in New York and Colorado. In July, 24% have a favorable opinion of DSA, while 54% are unfavorable.

As more candidates describe themselves as democratic socialists, without necessarily saying they are members of, or represent, the DSA organization, this poll sought to see whether voters respond differently to the DSA organization than to the “democratic socialist” identification of a candidate. To do so, the sample was divided into two random half-samples, with one half asked about “Democratic Socialists of America” and the other half asked about “democratic socialist candidates.” More people offer an opinion of democratic socialist candidates than of the DSA organization and are a bit more favorable to the candidate label than to the DSA organization, 31% to 24%. As such candidates become more common and voters more familiar with the label, the percentages holding either positive or negative views are likely to increase. The comparison of the candidate label and the DSA is shown in Table 28, along with the trend in opinion of DSA.

Table 28: Favorability to democratic socialists

Among adults

Poll dates	Favorablity
	Net favorable	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Democratic socialist candidates
7/22-29/26	-22	31	53	16
Democratic Socialists of America
7/22-29/26	-30	24	54	22
5/20-26/26	-27	21	48	31
4/8-16/26	-28	20	48	32
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: [Democratic socialist candidates] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?
Question: [Democratic Socialists of America] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Favorability toward several Democratic Party figures from the progressive or socialist wing of the party is shown in Table 29. Net favorability is highest for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is also the best known, followed by New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, though considerably more people lack an opinion of him. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is least well known and has slightly higher net favorability rating than New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. All four have net negative favorability ratings, as is increasingly common for national political figures of both parties.

Table 29: Favorability to Democratic political figures

Among adults

Political figure	Favorability
	Net favorability	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Bernie Sanders	-2	45	47	8
Zohran Mamdani	-6	33	39	28
Pete Buttigieg	-10	27	37	37
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez	-11	32	43	25
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Favorability ratings of Republican administration officials are also all net negative, with variation in how well known these figures are. Trump and Vice President JD Vance are best known, and share the same 38% favorable rating, though Vance is seen less unfavorably than Trump. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is the least well known, despite his role in the Iran war, with 32% saying they lack an opinion of him. Nonetheless he ties with Trump for the most-negative net favorability. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has the best net favorability rating, at -11 percentage points, but is also unfamiliar to 21% of adults. These ratings are shown in Table 30.

Table 30: Favorability to Republican political figures

Among adults

Political figure	Favorability
	Net favorability	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Marco Rubio	-11	34	45	21
JD Vance	-16	38	54	8
Donald Trump	-22	38	60	2
Pete Hegseth	-22	23	45	32
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Opinions concerning Israel

Opinions of Israel have turned substantially negative since March 2025, with net favorability falling from an even balance of 0 to a -24 net rating. Unfavorable opinion has increased from 43% to 55% in the wake of the war in Gaza and the Iran war. This is shown in Table 31. 

Table 31: Favorability to Israel

Among adults

Poll dates	Favorability
	Net favorability	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
7/22-29/26	-24	31	55	14
4/8-16/26	-21	33	54	14
11/5-12/25	-13	35	48	17
9/15-24/25	-13	36	49	15
3/17-27/25	0	43	43	14
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Underlying the declining opinion of Israel are striking differences between the parties and by age within each party. Within each age group, Republicans are more favorable to Israel than independents, who in turn are more favorable than Democrats. At the same time, there is a very large difference in opinion by age within each party, with younger people much less favorable than are older people. Within the Democratic Party, unfavorable opinions of Israel have become dominant across all age groups, with only 16% of Democrats over 60 holding a favorable opinion and just 5% favorable among those under 30. While favorability is higher among Republicans, there is a very large 48-percentage-point gap between Republicans under 40, at 29% favorable, and those 60 and older, who have a 77% favorable rating. These comparisons are shown in Table 32.

Table 32: Favorability to Israel, by age and party identification

Among adults

Age	Favorability
	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Republican
18-29	29	58	13
30-44	38	49	13
45-59	52	38	10
60+	77	20	3
Independent
18-29	0	65	35
30-44	7	61	33
45-59	32	36	32
60+	35	49	16
Democrat
18-29	5	84	12
30-44	10	76	13
45-59	15	65	19
60+	16	74	10
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Negative opinions of Israel are also apparent on the question of military aid to that country. Just over half, 52% of adults, say the U.S. is giving too much military aid to Israel, with 32% saying it is the right amount and 16% saying too little. For comparison, a different question asked about U.S. support to Israel during the Gaza conflict. Here the percentage saying the U.S. was giving too much support rose from 28% in November 2023 to 41% in November 2025, when the question was last asked. These comparisons are shown in Table 33.

Table 33: Aid to Israel

Among adults

Poll dates	Amount of aid
	Too much	Too little	About the right amount
Military aid
7/22-29/26	52	16	32
Support for U.S. aid during war in Gaza
11/5-12/25	41	17	41
9/15-24/25	42	23	34
12/2-11/24	40	24	36
5/6-15/24	41	24	35
3/18-28/24	37	24	39
2/5-15/24	42	21	38
11/2-7/23	28	17	33
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you think the United States is providing too much military aid to Israel, not enough aid to Israel, or about the right amount of aid to Israel?
Question: When it comes to Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza, do you think the United States is providing too much support to Israel, not enough support to Israel, or about the right amount of support to Israel?

As with favorability, more young people say the U.S. is giving too much military aid to Israel. Republicans are less skeptical of aid than independents and Democrats. But, among Republicans, the percentage saying there is too much military aid reaches 54% among those under 30 and declines to just 16% for those 60 and older. There are only slight age differences among independents, with just about half in each age group saying there is too much aid. Among Democrats, all age groups have large majorities saying there is too much military aid, with modestly more of the young saying so. These results are shown in Table 34.

Table 34: Military aid to Israel, by age and party identification

Among adults

Age	Amount of aid
	Too much	Too little	About the right amount
Republican
18-29	54	13	33
30-44	43	20	37
45-59	37	21	41
60+	16	18	66
Independent
18-29	52	30	18
30-44	54	17	29
45-59	49	19	32
60+	53	22	25
Democrat
18-29	75	15	10
30-44	75	14	11
45-59	67	14	20
60+	69	7	24
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you think the United States is providing too much military aid to Israel, not enough aid to Israel, or about the right amount of aid to Israel?

Data centers

Public doubt about the costs of data centers remains high, as it has been since January in Marquette Law School Poll national surveys. In July, 73% say the costs of data centers outweigh the benefits, with 27% believing the benefits are greater. Since January, there has been an 11-percentage-point increase in those saying the costs are greater than the benefits. A majority of Republicans, 66%, say the costs outweigh the benefits, rising to 72% among independents and 80% among Democrats. The trend in opinion is shown in Table 35.

Table 35: Costs and benefits of data centers

Among adults

Poll dates	Costs and benefits
	Benefits outweigh costs	Costs outweigh benefits
7/22-29/26	27	73
5/20-26/26	29	71
4/8-16/26	30	69
1/21-28/26	37	62
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Companies are investing billions of dollars around the country in construction of data centers to run artificial intelligence and other applications. Which comes closer to your opinion, even if neither is exactly right:

There is also considerable doubt about whether artificial intelligence, AI, will be good for society, with 70% saying it will be bad. This is closely linked to opinion of data centers. Among those who think AI will be good for society, 59% say the benefits outweigh the costs of data centers. Among those who think AI will be bad for society, 87% say the costs are greater. The recent trend in views of AI is shown in Table 36.

Table 36: Is AI good or bad for society

Among adults

Poll dates	Good or bad
	A good thing	A bad thing
7/22-29/26	30	70
5/20-26/26	35	65
4/8-16/26	30	70
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, July 22-29, 2026
Question: Do you think the development of artificial intelligence (AI) is a good thing for society or a bad thing?

In this survey, 64% say they have used AI in the past month, while 36% say they do not use AI. AI users are more likely than non-users to say AI will be good for society, but, even among users, only 39% say AI will be good and 61% say it will be a bad thing. Among those who do not use AI, 14% think it will be a good thing and 86% say it will be bad for society.

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted July 22-29, 2026, interviewing 1,076 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.2 percentage points. For registered voters, the sample size is 886, with a margin of error of +/-3.5. For likely voters, the sample size is 572 with a margin of error of +/-4.4 percentage points.

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on public views of the Supreme Court) are held for release on Aug. 6. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available on the Marquette Law Poll website.