New Marquette Law School national survey finds 60% disapprove of the work of ICE, with Democrats and independents opposed to ICE and Republicans in favor

Secondary headlines:

  • 37% say shooting of Renee Good was justified, 62% say it was not justified
  • General support for deportations remains steady, with 56% favoring deporting those in the U.S. illegally
  • Overall approval of President Trump is at 42%, continuing a gradual decline
  • Opinion of the state of the economy improves from November

MILWAUKEE — A new Marquette Law School poll finds 40% of adults nationwide approve of the way U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE, is handling its job, while 60% disapprove. The poll was conducted after the shooting in Minneapolis of Renee Good, but with most interviews completed before the shooting of Alex Pretti on Jan. 24, 2026.

Views of ICE are sharply divided along partisan lines with 80% of Republicans approving of its work, compared to 23% of independents and 5% of Democrats.

Thirty-seven percent of respondents say the shooting of Good was justified, and 62% say it was not justified. Here, too, there is a large partisan gap, with 76% of Republicans, 21% of independents, and 5% of Democrats saying it was justified.

The Good shooting was highly visible to Americans, with 76% saying they had heard or read a lot about it, 17% saying they had heard a little, and 7% saying they had heard nothing at all. Independents were less likely to have heard a lot (55%) than either Republicans (76%) or Democrats (84%).

The survey was conducted Jan. 21-28, 2026, interviewing 1,003 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.4 percentage points. For registered voters, the sample size was 869, with a margin of error of +/-3.6. For likely voters, the sample size was 577, with a margin of error of +/-4.4 percentage points.

Opinion about deportations has hardly changed since November. In the current poll, 56% favored deporting “immigrants who are living in the United States illegally,” with 44% opposed. In November, 58% favored and 42% opposed such deportations.

Among those who favor deportations, about a third, 35%, disapprove of the way ICE is enforcing immigration, while 65% approve of ICE’s conduct. Those who oppose deportations are almost unanimously opposed to ICE, with 96% disapproving and 4% approving.

When asked about deportations of those who “have lived here for a number of years, have jobs and no criminal record,” support for deportations declines to 44%, with 56% opposed. This result is unchanged from November.

Those who favor deporting longtime residents without a criminal record are more approving of ICE’s conduct, with 78% approval against 22% disapproval. Of those opposed to deporting longtime residents without a criminal record, 89% disapprove of ICE, while 11% approve.

Fifty-two percent say the United States is mostly deporting immigrants who have no criminal record, while 47% say most deportations are of people with criminal records. Among Republicans, 83% say most deportees have criminal records, while 57% of independents and 86% of Democrats say most deportees have no criminal record.

Approval of President Donald Trump’s handling of immigration stands at 44%, with 56% who disapprove. In November, 45% approved and 55% disapproved of how Trump has handled immigration. Approval on this issue has declined from 50% in May, with net approval standing at -12 percentage points, as shown in Table 1. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)

Table 1: Approval of Trump handling of immigration

Among adults

Poll datesApproval
Net approve minus disapproveApproveDisapprove
1/21-28/26-124456
11/5-12/25-104555
9/15-24/25-84654
7/7-16/25-64753
5/5-15/2505050
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: [Immigration] Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling each of the following issues?

Attention to news

The Good shooting in Minneapolis received the most attention from the public among seven topics covered, with 76% hearing or reading a lot, followed by the military operation in Venezuela that captured Nicolás Maduro, with 65% hearing a lot. The partial release of the Jeffrey Epstein files also caught the attention of more than half of the public.

Items falling below 50% of respondents saying they read or heard a lot include the killing of film director Rob Reiner and the social services fraud in Minnesota. Lower in public attention are the renaming of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts as the Trump-Kennedy Center. The news that got the least attention was the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to allow Texas to use its redrawn congressional districts in the 2026 elections. Table 2 shows the complete results.

Table 2: Attention to events in the news

Among adults

ItemHeard or read
A lotA littleNothing at all
The fatal shooting of a Minneapolis woman, Renee Good, by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent76177
The U.S. Army operation in Venezuela that captured Nicolás Maduro65278
The partial release of the Jeffrey Epstein files by the Department of Justice57349
The killing of filmmaker and actor Rob Reiner and his wife in December483617
A widespread social services fraud scandal in Minnesota including Medicaid, housing, and autism services453124
Renaming the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington as the Trump-Kennedy Center403228
The U.S. Supreme Court decision in December that allowed Texas to use redrawn congressional districts in the 2026 elections294131
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Here are some recent topics in the news. How much have you heard or read about each of these?

Some news items become equally well known regardless of which news sources people rely upon—only conservative television news sources (Fox News, Newsmax, or OAN) or other network television news (ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS or BBC)—while others show substantial differences.

There is little difference in amount heard about the Venezuela operation, the Good shooting, or the killing of Rob Reiner, with small amounts more of other-network TV news consumers hearing more about these events than those who consume only conservative TV news sources.

There are larger differences for news about the Supreme Court’s Texas redistricting decision, and much larger gaps are found for the Epstein files, the Minnesota social services fraud scandal, and renaming the Kennedy Center. More other-network TV news consumers (than those who consume only conservative TV news sources) had heard or read a lot about the Texas redistricting decision by about 10 percentage points (44% to 34%), the Epstein files by 26 points (75% to 49%), and renaming the Kennedy Center by 31 more points (63% to 32%).

With the Minnesota social services fraud scandal, 71% of conversative TV news consumers had heard or read a lot, compared to 45% of other-network TV news consumers—a 26-point difference.

A consistent result across all topics is that those who rely on other news sources, neither conservative nor other network news, are notably less likely to have heard a lot about any of these topics. Only one topic had more than 50% of consumers of other news sources hearing or reading it—60% have heard or read a lot about the Good shooting.

The full results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Attention to events in the news, by news sources

Among adults

ItemHeard or read a lot
Net conservative minus other networkConservative TV news onlyConservative & other network TV newsOther network TV news onlyOnly other news sources
The U.S. Army operation in Venezuela that captured Nicolás Maduro-474737847
The fatal shooting of a Minneapolis woman, Renee Good, by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent-583848860
The killing of filmmaker and actor Rob Reiner and his wife in December-754566131
The U.S. Supreme Court decision in December that allowed Texas to use redrawn congressional districts in the 2026 elections-1034294415
The partial release of the Jeffrey Epstein files by the Department of Justice-2649657542
A widespread social services fraud scandal in Minnesota including Medicaid, housing, and autism services2671604530
Renaming the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington as the Trump-Kennedy Center-3132466321
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Here are some recent topics in the news. How much have you heard or read about each of these?

Partisans differ in where they turn for news, with Republicans more likely to rely on only conservative sources, while Democrats are much more likely to rely only on other network news sources. However, it is notable that 28% of Republicans rely on a mix of conservative and other network sources, while half that many Democrats, 13%, digest this mix of sources. Independents are much more likely than partisans to ignore television news and to rely on other news sources. Table 4 shows these results.

Table 4: News sources, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDNews sources
Conservative TV news onlyConservative & other network TV newsOther network TV news onlyOnly other news sources
Republican22281436
Independent6161761
Democrat2135232
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Which of the following, if any, have you read, watched, or listened to in the past month for information about political news and current affairs?

2026 congressional vote

Looking ahead to November, 48% of registered voters say they would vote for the Democratic candidate for Congress and 44% would vote for the Republican candidate. Among likely voters, i.e., those who say they are certain to vote next November, 52% support the Democratic candidate and 45% prefer the Republican. In November 2025, 49% favored the Democrat and 44% the Republican among registered voters.

In this poll, Democrats are only slightly advantaged by a greater commitment to voting in November’s midterm elections. Among registered voters, 72% of Democrats say they are certain to vote, compared to 70% of Republicans. That is a narrower edge than in November’s survey, in which 75% of Democrats were certain to vote versus 68% of Republicans.

Independents are much less likely to vote than either partisan camp, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Likelihood of voting, by party identification

Among registered voters

Poll datesLikelihood of voting
Absolutely certain to voteVery likely to voteChances are 50-50Don’t think will vote
Republican
1/21-28/267018111
11/5-12/25681994
Independent
1/21-28/264126267
11/5-12/2537272214
Democrat
1/21-28/26721774
11/5-12/25751672
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: What are the chances that you will vote in the November 2026 general election for congressional and state offices– are you absolutely certain to vote, very likely to vote, are the chances 50-50, or don’t you think you will vote?

Approval of how Republicans in Congress are doing their job stands at 39%, with disapproval at 60%. This is little-changed from November, when 40% approved and 60% disapproved.

For Democrats in Congress, 29% of respondents approve and 71% disapprove. This is a considerable decline from November, during the federal government shutdown, when 36% approved and 64% disapproved.

The decline in approval of Democrats, and the stability of Republicans, come from differences in support within their parties. Approval of congressional Democrats among Democratic voters fell from 64% in November to 51% in January. By contrast, approval of Republicans in Congress among Republican voters has remained stable, with 79% approval in November and 80% approval in January.

Democrats in Congress also experienced a decline in approval among independents, from 29% approval in November to 21% approval in January. Approval of congressional Republicans among independents rose 2 points, from 20% in November to 22% in January.

The reason Democrats are able to maintain their lead in the congressional vote is that Democrats are extremely loyal to their party’s congressional candidates, despite their disappointment with their party. Table 6 shows the congressional vote choices by party for January and November among registered voters. Democrats are slightly more loyal to their party than Republicans are to theirs. Democrats also have an advantage among independents, though many of them say they would support neither party or not vote.

Table 6: 2026 congressional vote, by party identification

Among registered voters

Poll datesCongressional vote choice
Democratic candidateRepublican candidateNeitherWould not vote
Republican
1/21-28/2669220
11/5-12/2549150
Independent
1/21-28/263610514
11/5-12/253817396
Democrat
1/21-28/2695131
11/5-12/2596211
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: If the election for Congress were held today, would you vote for the (Democratic) candidate in your district or the (Republican) candidate in your district?

Which party is better on issues

Across eight issues, the Republicans are seen as better able to handle four issues than Democrats. Democrats are seen as better on two issues. On two issues, there is little difference.

Republicans have substantial advantages on crime, national defense, and immigration and border security, and a smaller advantage on taxes. Democrats have large advantages on health care and on Medicare and Social Security. These party strengths have been common images of the parties for some time.

On the economy and on inflation and the cost of living, the parties are seen as closely matched.

On all eight issues, from a quarter to a third of adults say the parties are about the same or that neither would be good—the latter being a sign of disenchantment with both parties. The full results are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Which party is better across issues

Among adults

IssueNet Rep minus DemRepublican partyDemocratic partyBoth about the sameNeither would be good
Crime2344212213
National defense1843252011
Immigration and border security1846281313
Taxes939301615
The economy337341613
Inflation and the cost of living-133341815
Health care-1828461214
Medicare and Social Security-1828461313
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Do you think the (Republican party) or the (Democratic party) would do a better job handling each of the following issues?

The most important issues

Inflation and the cost of living is the top issue for 38% of adults, followed by the economy at 17% and immigration and border security at 14%. The top two issues are also the two with the smallest difference in which party would do a better job on the issue, as shown in Table 7. The Republican strength on the third most important issue, immigration, is offset by the Democratic party advantage on the next two top issues, Medicare and Social Security and health care. The other issues see below 5% choosing them as most important. Table 8 shows these results.

Table 8: Most important issue

Among adults

Issue 
Percent most important
Inflation and the cost of living38
The economy17
Immigration and border security14
Medicare & Social Security9
Health care8
Abortion policy3
The size of the federal deficit3
Crime2
The war between Russia and Ukraine1
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Which one of the following issues matters MOST to you right now?

Trump job approval across issues

In January, Trump’s overall job approval is 42% and disapproval is 58%. This almost matches his approval late in his first term in September 2020, when 41% approved and 58% disapproved.

This is a slight decline from November, when 43% approved and 57% disapproved. Over the first year of his second term, Trump’s job approval has moved steadily downward in small poll-to-poll changes. His approval has declined from 48% in February 2025, while disapproval has risen from 52%. This has taken him from a small net negative approval of -4 points to a current net of -16 points. Table 9 shows his approval in each Marquette poll of the second term, plus his standing in September 2020.

Table 9: Trump approval trend

Among adults

Poll datesApproval
Net approve minus disapproveApproveDisapprove
1/21-28/26-164258
11/5-12/25-144357
9/15-24/25-144357
7/7-16/25-104555
5/5-15/25-84654
3/17-27/25-84654
1/27-2/6/25-44852
9/8-15/20-174158
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

There is a wide range of approval of Trump’s handling across eight topics, with a majority (53%) approving his handling of border security, giving him a net approval on that subject of +6 points. On the low end, 30% approve of his handling of inflation and the cost of living and his handling of information about Jeffrey Epstein. Both of these have a net approval of -39 points. His second highest approval is on immigration, though more disapprove than approve. Opinions of Trump’s handling of the economy and tariffs are both quite negative, with net approvals of -24 points and -25 points, respectively. Two new topics are the situation in Venezuela, with a net approval of -13 points, and his use of military force, a net of -17 points. Table 10 shows these results.

Table 10: Trump job approval across issues

Among adults

IssueNet approve minus disapproveApproveDisapprove
Border security65347
Immigration-124456
The situation in Venezuela-134356
Overall-164258
The use of military force-174158
The economy-243862
Tariffs-253762
Inflation/cost of living-393069
Information about Jeffrey Epstein-393069
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling each of the following issues?

Personal characteristics

Views of Trump’s personal characteristics show some changes since October 2024.

  • A majority, 55%, think the phrase “is too old to be president” describes Trump very or somewhat well, a slight decrease from the month before the 2024 election.
  • “Shares your values” describes Trump for 39%, a decline of 6 points from 2024.
  • Fewer people see Trump as having a strong record of accomplishments, 46%, than in 2024, a decline of 7 points.
  • The number of those saying he has the right temperament to be president stands at 36%, little changed since 2024.

These results are shown in Table 11.

Table 11: How well does this phrase describe Trump

Among adults

Poll datesHow well phrase describes
Very/somewhat wellNot too/not at all well
Is too old to be president
1/21-28/265545
10/1-10/245941
Shares your values
1/21-28/263961
10/1-10/244555
Strong record of accomplishments
1/21-28/264654
10/1-10/245347
Has the right temperament to be president
1/21-28/263664
10/1-10/243862
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: How well does each of the following phrases describe Donald Trump?

Actions in Venezuela

A majority of adults, 55%, think the United States did the right thing in capturing Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, while 45% think it was the wrong thing to do. This is a substantial change in opinion from November, when respondents were asked “Do you think the United States should attempt to remove Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro from power or should the United States not get involved in Venezuela?” In November, 24% said the U.S. should attempt to remove Maduro, while 76% said the U.S. should not get involved in Venezuela.

Opinion shifted most dramatically among Republicans, 37% of whom said the U.S. should remove Maduro in November. In January 87% say the U.S. did the right thing in capturing him. Independents also shifted substantially, from 20% support for U.S. action in November rising to 51% in January. Democratic support of intervention almost doubled, from 12% in November to 23% in January.

While support for capturing Maduro rose, the public is reluctant to further expand involvement in Venezuela by sending troops in order to take control of the country. Such expanded involvement is favored by 28% and opposed by 72%. Despite their support for capturing Maduro, Republicans are not inclined to commit troops, with 46% in favor and 54% opposed. Among independents 70% are opposed, as are 89% of Democrats.

The practice of lethal strikes on boats suspected of smuggling drugs is approved by 45% and disapproved by 54%. In November, 49% approved and 51% disapproved.

Asked who is now running Venezuela, 40% say the United States is in charge, while 60% say the Venezuelan government is running the country.

Greenland

Twenty-nine percent say they favor the U.S. taking control of Greenland, with 70% opposed. In May, 27% favored and 73% were opposed.

Prices and financial situation

The public remains pessimistic about prices, with 61% saying inflation will increase over the next 12 months, 19% saying inflation will stay about the same, and 19% thinking inflation will decrease. That is an improved outlook from November, when 67% expected inflation to increase over the next year.

Prices of specific items can move in different directions, and perceptions of price changes reflect this. Asked about the price of groceries, 70% say this has gone up over the past six months, in line with government estimates of inflation in food prices of about 3% in 2025. Only 11% think grocery prices have gone down.

In contrast, 50% say the price of gasoline has gone down, with 29% who say prices have held steady and 21% say gasoline has become more expensive. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports the average price of unleaded regular gas declined from $3.339 in September to $3.050 in December.

Perception of grocery price changes is related to whether one does the grocery shopping or someone else in the household does it. For those who say they do most of the shopping, 72% say prices have gone up, while among those who say someone else does the shopping, 58% think prices have increased. Experience at the checkout seems to matter. Of those who say they share the grocery shopping about equally, 71% say prices are up, virtually the same as for those who say they do most of the shopping.

Views of the economy improved from November to January. In November, 28% said the economy was excellent or good, a percentage that rose to 35% in January. At the gloomy end of the scale, the percent saying the economy is poor decreased from 29% in November to 25% in January. Despite the short-term decline, the percentage saying the economy is poor, 15%, was lower in February 2025. The recent trend is shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Views of the national economy

Among adults

Poll datesNational economy
ExcellentGoodNot so goodPoor
1/21-28/264314025
11/5-12/252264329
9/15-24/252275020
7/7-16/253324421
5/5-15/253294722
3/17-27/252245320
1/27-2/6/251265815
12/2-11/244255021
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: How would you describe the state of the nation’s economy these days?

There has been a small improvement in how people describe their family financial situation. In January, 40% say they are living comfortably, an improvement from November’s 31%, and a small improvement from a year ago when 36% said they were comfortable. Similarly, the percentage saying they are struggling declined from November to January, and is down slightly over the year. Table 13 shows financial situation poll results since December 2024.

Table 13: Family financial situation

Among adults

Poll datesFinancial situation
Living comfortablyJust getting byStrugglingSkipped/Ref
1/21-28/264045150
11/5-12/253144240
9/15-24/253746170
7/7-16/253547180
5/5-15/253548170
3/17-27/253847150
1/27-2/6/253648170
12/2-11/243544200
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Thinking about your family’s financial situation, would you say you are living comfortably, just getting by, or struggling to make ends meet?

Data centers

The construction of large data centers has become controversial in parts of the country. In January, 37% say the benefits of these centers outweigh the costs, while 62% say the costs outweigh the benefits.

While data centers have sparked controversy in some locations, most people have heard little or nothing about them in their state: 14% say they have heard a lot, 43% have heard a little, and 43% have heard nothing at all.

Those who have heard a lot about data centers are more likely to say the costs outweigh the benefits (71%) than those who have heard a little (60%) or those who have heard nothing at all (62%).

Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs

The public is about equally divided on the question of whether diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs should be terminated in the federal government, education, and business. Forty-six percent favor ending DEI programs, while 53% oppose terminating them. These results are similar to the results in March and May 2025 when 50% and 48% favored ending DEI programs. The March and May questions asked about ending the programs in the federal government but did not mention education or business.

A majority of adults (58%) say that DEI programs do not affect the jobs of white men, while 41% say DEI programs lead to job discrimination against white men.

There are substantial differences in this perception, by race and gender, as shown in Table 14. A majority of white men (60%) believe DEI programs lead to discrimination against white men, while a majority of white women (58%) say it does not. Among nonwhite men and women, more than two-thirds say DEI programs do not produce discrimination against white men.

Table 14: Does DEI lead to job discrimination against white men, by race and gender

Among adults

RaceJob discrimination
GenderLead to job discrimination against white menDo not affect the jobs of white men
WhiteMale6039
WhiteFemale4158
NonwhiteMale3367
NonwhiteFemale2376
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Do you think diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI, programs lead to job discrimination against white men or do they not affect the jobs of white men?

Prospects for democracy and pride in the country

The public is evenly divided about the country’s future as a democracy, with 50% saying they are very or somewhat optimistic and 50% who say they are not very or not at all optimistic. While there is a substantial partisan gap in optimism, the party polarization is not as large as on most issues. While 74% of Republicans are optimistic, 26% are not. And while 66% of Democrats are not optimistic, 34% have an optimistic outlook. Independents are quite pessimistic, with 70% who say they are not optimistic.

As for pride in “who we are as a country,” only a small majority (55%) say they are very or somewhat proud, with 45% saying they are not very or not at all proud.

There is a sharp decline in pride in the country as one moves from people born before 1960 through each succeeding decade of birth, as shown in Table 15.

Table 15: Proud of our country, by decade of birth

Among adults

Decade of birthProud of country
ProudNot proud
Pre-19607030
1960s6733
1970s5446
1980s5545
1990s4357
2000s3367
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: How proud are you of who we are as a country?

There is also a large partisan gap in pride in the country, with Republicans far more proud than independents or Democrats.

Table 16: Proud of our country, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDProud of country
ProudNot proud
Republican8713
Independent3664
Democrat3070
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: How proud are you of who we are as a country?

Trust in other people

Fifty-two percent of adults say most people can be trusted, while 48% say most people cannot be trusted.

There is a large gradient in trust in other people by decade of birth, shown in Table 16. The most recent birth cohorts are far less trusting that those born in the 1960s or before, and trust declines with each successive recent cohort.

Table 17: Trust in other people, by decade of birth

Among adults

Decade of birthTrust in other people
Most people can be trustedMost people can’t be trusted
Pre-19607525
1960s5545
1970s5644
1980s4654
1990s4456
2000s3367
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Jan. 21-28, 2026
Question: Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or most people can’t be trusted?

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted Jan. 21-28, 2026, interviewing 1,003 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.4 percentage points. For registered voters, the sample size was 869, with a margin of error of +/-3.6. For likely voters the sample size was 577, with a margin of error of +/-4.4 percentage points.

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on those about public views of the Supreme Court) are held for release on Feb. 5. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available on the Marquette Law School Poll website.

New Marquette Law School national survey finds 55% say Department of Justice has filed unjustified cases against Trump’s political opponents

58% say cases brought against Trump in 2023 and 2024 were justified

Also:

  • Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court dipped in November to 44%, the lowest in a year
  • Attention to news about the Court is higher than in September
  • A large majority says the president must obey the Supreme Court; smaller majority says lower federal court limits on president’s executive orders are a proper exercise of judicial power

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds 55% say the Department of Justice has filed unjustified criminal cases against President Donald Trump’s political opponents, while 45% think the cases are justified. Recent cases have been brought against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Views of these prosecutions are closely divided among Republicans and independents. Among Republicans, 48% believe unjustified cases have been filed, while 52% say the cases are justified. Among independents, 47% say cases are unjustified and 51% say they are justified. Among Democrats, 65% say cases are unjustified, while 35% say cases are justified.

In contrast to the current prosecutions, 58% say the federal and state criminal cases brought against Trump in 2023 and 2024 were justified, with 42% saying they were unjustified. Partisan differences are much greater concerning the prosecutions of Trump than for the cases against Trump’s opponents. Among Republicans, 77% say the cases against Trump were unjustified, with 23% saying they were justified. With independents, 68% say the cases against Trump were justified and 29% say they were unjustified, while 90% of Democrats say those cases were justified and 10% say they were not.

Table 1 shows the comparison of cases brought against Trump opponents and those against Trump by party identification. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)

Table 1: Are cases against Trump opponents and against Trump justified, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDJustified or unjustified
Filed unjustified casesFiled justified cases
Cases against Trump opponents
Republican4852
Independent4751
Democrat6535
Cases against Trump
Republican7723
Independent2968
Democrat1090
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Do you think the U.S. Justice Department has filed unjustified criminal cases against Donald Trump’s political opponents, or do you think the cases are justified?
Question: Do you think the U.S. Justice Department and state prosecutors filed unjustified criminal cases against Donald Trump in 2023-2024, or do you think the cases were justified?

The poll was conducted Nov. 5-12, 2025, among 1,052 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points.

Approval of the Supreme Court

Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court dipped to 44% in November, down from 50% in September. Disapproval of the Court rose to 56% from September’s 50%. Approval of the Court suffered a sharp decline in May and July 2022, with approval typically in the low-to-mid 40% range in bimonthly polling since then. Approval rose through the second half of 2024 and 2025 until this month’s decline. The current 44% approval was the lowest since July 2024, when approval was at 43%. Table 2 shows approval of the Court since September 2020.

Table 2: United States Supreme Court approval

Among adults

Poll datesApproval
NetApproveDisapprove
11/5-12/25-124456
9/15-24/2505050
7/7-16/25-24951
5/5-15/2565347
3/17-27/2585446
1/27-2/6/2525149
12/2-11/24-44852
10/1-10/24-104555
7/24-8/1/24-144357
5/6-15/24-223961
3/18-28/24-64753
2/5-15/24-204060
11/2-7/23-184159
9/18-25/23-144357
7/7-12/23-104555
5/8-18/23-184159
3/13-22/23-124456
1/9-20/23-64753
11/15-22/22-124456
9/7-14/22-204060
7/5-12/22-233861
5/9-19/22-114455
3/14-24/2295445
1/10-21/2265246
11/1-10/2185446
9/7-16/21-14950
7/16-26/21216039
9/8-15/20336633
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?

There are substantial partisan differences in views of the Supreme Court, with Republicans much more approving (74%) than independents (33%) or Democrats (17%). The recent trend in approval by party identification is shown in Table 3. Republican net approval fell by 14 points from September to November and independent net approval declined by 20 points. Democrats showed less change, down 4 points in net approval.

Table 3: United States Supreme Court approval, by party ID

Among adults

Poll datesApproval
NetApproveDisapprove
Republican
11/5-12/25487426
9/15-24/25628119
7/7-16/25628119
5/5-15/25567822
3/17-27/25587921
1/27-2/6/25688416
12/2-11/24487426
10/1-10/24366832
7/24-8/1/24346733
5/6-15/24145743
Independent
11/5-12/25-343367
9/15-24/25-144357
7/7-16/25-104555
5/5-15/25-144357
3/17-27/25-104555
1/27-2/6/25-84654
12/2-11/24-84654
10/1-10/24-184159
7/24-8/1/24-223961
5/6-15/24-482674
Democrat
11/5-12/25-661783
9/15-24/25-621981
7/7-16/25-641882
5/5-15/25-383169
3/17-27/25-383169
1/27-2/6/25-621981
12/2-11/24-582179
10/1-10/24-542377
7/24-8/1/24-582179
5/6-15/24-542377
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?

Thirty percent say they have heard or read a lot about the Court over the last month, 60% have heard a little, and 10% have heard nothing at all. Those hearing a lot about the Court rose from 22% in September. This is the highest level of attention to the Court since December 2024, with the exception of July 2025 following the Court’s release of a number of major decisions in June. At that point, 34% said they had heard or read a lot about the Court during the previous month. Table 4 shows the attention cycle over the last year. Typically, attention rises from winter to summer as the Court hands down most major decisions in June. Attention this November is considerably higher than either October or December 2024.

Table 4: Attention to news about the Supreme Court

Among adults

Poll datesHear or read about the Court
A lotA littleNothing at all
11/5-12/25306010
9/15-24/25226118
7/7-16/25345115
5/5-15/25256015
3/17-27/25256312
1/27-2/6/25176814
12/2-11/24176418
10/1-10/24196120
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Thinking about the last month only, how much have you heard or read about the U.S. Supreme Court?

Democrats are currently paying more attention to the Court than are Republicans or independents. Forty-one percent of Democrats say they heard or read a lot about the Court in the last month, compared to 23% of Republicans and 18% of independents.

Greater attention to the Court is associated with partisan polarization in approval of the Court. Among Republicans, approval increases with greater attention, while with Democrats disapproval rises with greater attention. Independents who have heard a lot about the Court are more disapproving than those who have heard less. These results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Attention to news and approval of the Court, by party ID

Among adults

Heard about CourtApproval
NetApproveDisapprove
Republican
A lot567822
A little507525
Nothing at all286436
Independent
A lot-542377
A little-263763
Nothing at all-383169
Democrat
A lot-801090
A little-621981
Nothing at all-263763
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?
Question: Thinking about the last month only, how much have you heard or read about the U.S. Supreme Court?

A majority, 56%, think the Supreme Court is going out of its way to avoid ruling against Trump, while 44% say it is not avoiding ruling against him. This perception was nearly identical in September, with 55% saying the Court was avoiding ruling against Trump and 45% saying it was not.

In November, this perception shifted in opposite directions within political parties. More Republicans in November see the Court as trying to avoid a ruling than did so in September, while among Democrats fewer see such avoidance than in September. Independents hardly changed their opinion. Regardless of either month of interview, a majority of Republicans say the Court is not trying to avoid ruling against Trump, while a majority of independents and a large majority of Democrats think the Court is trying to avoid ruling against him. These results are shown in Table 6.

Table 6: Is the Court avoiding ruling against Trump, by party identification

Among adults

Poll datesAvoiding or not
Is going out of its way to avoidIs not avoiding a ruling
Republican
11/5-12/253763
9/15-24/253169
Independent
11/5-12/255841
9/15-24/255842
Democrat
11/5-12/257426
9/15-24/258119
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Do you think the U.S. Supreme Court is going out of its way to avoid making a ruling that President Donald Trump might refuse to obey?

Views of how justices decide cases are shaped by partisanship, with 60% of Republicans saying justices’ decisions are mainly based on the law, while 62% of independents and 68% of Democrats say decisions are mainly based on politics.

The perception of how justices decide cases also affects approval of the Court, with those saying decisions are based mainly on the law giving the Court greater approval and those stressing politics giving lower approval. Approval is about 30 points higher, regardless of party, for those who think decisions are mainly based on the law, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Court approval, by basis of decisions and by party identification

Among adults

Basis of decisionsApproval
ApproveDisapprove
Republican
Mainly politics5644
Mainly the law8614
Independent
Mainly politics2179
Mainly the law5446
Democrat
Mainly politics892
Mainly the law3565
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job? Question: In general, what most often motivates Supreme Court justices’ decisions?

Despite concern that the Court may be trying to avoid ruling against the president, a large majority say the president must obey rulings of the Supreme Court. In November, 84% say the president must follow the Court’s rulings, while only 16% say the president can ignore Court rulings. This large majority has hardly changed since 2019, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8: President must obey rulings of the Supreme Court

Among adults

Poll datesObey Supreme Court rulings
The president has the power to ignore the rulingThe president is required to do as the ruling says
11/5-12/251684
9/15-24/251684
7/7-16/251783
5/5-15/251684
3/17-27/251783
1/27-2/6/251783
12/2-11/242179
9/8-15/201682
9/3-13/192276
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: If the Supreme Court rules against the president in a case, does the president have the power to ignore that ruling, or is the president required to do as the ruling says?

Significantly, substantial majorities of Republicans, independents, and Democrats agree that the president must obey Court rulings, as shown in Table 9.

Table 9: President must obey the Supreme Court, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDMust obey Court
The president has the power to ignore the rulingThe president is required to do as the ruling says
Republican2278
Independent2476
Democrat892
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: If the Supreme Court rules against the president in a case, does the president have the power to ignore that ruling, or is the president required to do as the ruling says?

District courts have issued a number of orders blocking executive actions since January. Sixty-five percent of people in this poll say such orders are a proper use of judicial authority, while 35% say such orders are not proper. A majority of Republicans, 61%, say these rulings are not a proper use of judicial authority, while 71% of independents and 89% of Democrats say they are an appropriate exercise of judicial power. This relationship is shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Proper for courts to block executive orders, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDProper for courts to block executive orders
YesNo
Republican3961
Independent7129
Democrat8911
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: Federal courts have issued orders temporarily blocking a number of the Trump administration’s executive actions. Do you think such orders can be a proper use of judicial authority?

Among the rulings of lower federal courts are cases concerning the deployment of National Guard troops in several cities across the country. Asked specifically about courts blocking the National Guard from Chicago, 43% say the Supreme Court should allow the deployment, while 57% say the Court should allow the lower court decision blocking deployment to stand. The partisan split here is substantial, with 81% of Republicans saying the Court should allow the deployment, while 78% of independents and 88% of Democrats say the Supreme Court should block the deployment.

The difference is not statistically significant if the question mentions the deployment of “National Guard troops from Texas”; support for allowing such deployment is a bit higher at 46%.

Upcoming cases before the Court

On Nov. 5, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, that challenges the president’s authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs. In this poll, conducted after oral arguments, 62% said the Court should uphold the appeals court ruling limiting the president’s tariff authority, and 38% said the appeals court ruling should be overturned. These results are virtually the same as in the September Marquette Law School poll, as shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Limiting president’s tariff power

Among adults

Poll datesUphold or overturn limits on tariff power
Uphold the appeals court ruling that limits the presidents’ authority to impose tariffsOverturn the appeals court ruling and hold that the President has the authority to set tariffs
11/5-12/256238
9/15-24/256139
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that substantially limits the president’s authority to impose tariffs on imports to the United States. This decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?

A substantial majority of Republicans would like the Court to overturn the limits on the president’s tariff authority, while a similarly large share of independents wants the limits upheld. Almost all Democrats want the tariff authority limited, as shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Limit president’s tariff authority, by party identification

Among adults

Party IDUphold or overturn limits on tariff authority
Uphold the appeals court ruling that limits the presidents’ authority to impose tariffsOverturn the appeals court ruling and hold that the President has the authority to set tariffs
Republican2674
Independent7523
Democrat937
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Nov. 5-12, 2025
Question: A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that substantially limits the president’s authority to impose tariffs on imports to the United States. This decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?

On Oct. 7, the Court heard oral arguments in Chiles v. Salazar, a challenge to Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy”—treatment intended to change a client’s sexual orientation or gender identity—for young people. The issue before the Court is this: Does this law regulate medical practice, or does it violate the First Amendment rights of therapists?

Sixty-seven percent say the law is a proper regulation of medical treatment, while 33% say it is impermissibly censoring speech.

In January, Trump issued an executive order declaring that there is no guarantee of citizenship for everyone born in the United States, contrary to longstanding policy that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution recognizes all such persons’ U.S. citizenship, regardless of the citizenship of their parents, with few exceptions. This order has been ruled to violate the Constitution by several federal district courts and is now expected to come before the Supreme Court. As to the 14th Amendment’s recognition of citizenship, 72% say the Court should rule it applies to all who are born in the United States, while 28% say the 14th Amendment should not apply to those born to non-citizens in the United States—but, rather, should apply only to former slaves, as the administration has argued.

Trump v. Slaughter concerns the president’s authority to remove members of the Federal Trade Commission despite statutory protections from removal. At issue is whether such statutory protections violate the separation of powers. Seventy-one percent say that statutory protections from removal should be allowed, while 29% say the Court should rule that the executive power of the president allows him to remove members of independent agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission.

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The poll was conducted Nov. 5-12, 2025, among 1,052 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points. The poll was entirely conducted after the Nov. 4 elections in New Jersey, Virginia and elsewhere. Seven percent of the sample was interviewed after the Senate voted to end the federal government shutdown on Nov. 9, but all interviews were completed before the House voted on Nov. 12.

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on views of the Trump administration and policy issues) were released on Nov. 19. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available on the Marquette Law School Poll website.

Wording of questions about recent and pending Supreme Court cases

These items do not attempt to exactly frame the particular issues in specific cases but rather address the topic in more general terms.

The wording of questions about cases includes:

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

  • A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that substantially limits the presidents’ authority to impose tariffs on imports to the United States. This decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?

Chiles v. Salazar

  • More than 20 states restrict therapists from trying to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of clients under age 18, often called “conversion therapy.” The Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case asking whether such a law, as it applies to talk therapy, is about properly regulating medical treatment or impermissibly censoring speech. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?

Birthright citizenship

  • The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments asking whether the 14th Amendment’s provision that those “born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” are U.S. citizens was intended to only apply to newly freed slaves after the Civil War and should not apply to a non-citizen‘s child who is born in the United States today. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?

Trump v. Slaughter

  • By federal statute, individuals appointed to serve on independent, multi-member regulatory agencies, like the Federal Trade Commission, can be removed only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case asking whether such Congressional requirements for removal infringe on the president’s executive power. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?