Prof. Merrill’s Hallows Lecture on How Implicit Legal Ideas Have Deformed the Constitution

Thomas W. Merrill amd Joe Kearney at a podium.
Dean Kearney (left) welcomes a question for Prof. Merrill after the Hallows Lecture.

The Law School had the privilege earlier this week to present our annual Hallows Lecture. The occasion remembers E. Harold Hallows, a Milwaukee lawyer who taught part-time at Marquette Law School during 1930–1958 and then served on the Wisconsin Supreme Court from 1958 until his death in 1974, the last six years as chief justice. For the lecture, we welcomed Thomas W. Merrill, the Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law at Columbia University, one of the nation’s most widely respected legal scholars.

Prof. Merrill’s Hallows Lecture, delivered on March 2 in the Lubar Center before 200 people (we counted), was rather a tour de force. Here were the title and advance description:

“Unstated”: How Three Implicit Legal Ideas Have Sidelined Congress and Empowered the President and the Courts

Why has Congress, the constitutional keystone of the federal government, become so ineffective, relative to the president and the federal judiciary? While many explanations have been offered, one important but unappreciated reason is legal ideas—not just widely discussed concepts such as the unitary executive and originalist interpretation of the Constitution but also, and perhaps even more importantly, unstated ideas that have taken hold without much explicit discussion or acknowledgment. This lecture will identify and discuss three largely unquestioned ideas that have combined to deform our constitutional regime. Their result has been that the president wields immense power in the guise of issuing orders and binding regulations and the courts exercise great power in the guise of interpreting the Constitution and laws, while Congress stands largely out of the picture. While there is no magic incantation for restoring a proper constitutional balance, an important first step is to recognize the role that unstated ideas have played in the transformation, so that they can be unmasked and debated in the open.

Even in advance of its publication this coming fall in the Marquette Law Review and Marquette Lawyer, Professor Merrill serialized the lecture this week for a national audience on the Volokh Conspiracy blog. Following an introductory post by Professor Eugene Volokh, the blog featured the following posts the past four days, March 2–5:

  1. How Unstated Legal Ideas Have Deformed the Constitution
  2. The “Unitary Executive” Theory’s Contribution to the Deformation of the Constitution
  3. The Role of Delegation Theories in Deforming the Constitution
  4. How the Supreme Court’s Conception of Its Role Contributes to the Deformation of the Constitution

The text of the entire lecture as prepared for presentation can be read here, and a video of the lecture is available to view here.

Continue ReadingProf. Merrill’s Hallows Lecture on How Implicit Legal Ideas Have Deformed the Constitution

Collecting Posts on Seventh Circuit Day

It was a great privilege for Marquette University Law School to host the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Eckstein Hall earlier this semester (September 25, 2025). The following blog posts form a now-complete series seeking to capture some aspects of the day:

  1. Seventh Circuit Day, Part 1: The Cases and Arguments (Nov. 3, 2025) by Joseph D. Kearney
  2. Effective Appellate Advocacy: Advice from the Bench (Nov. 5, 2025) by Melissa Love Koenig
  3. Appellate Judges Give a Window into How They Do Their Work (Nov. 7, 2025) by Alan J. Borsuk
  4. Praise for an Exemplar of the Marquette Lawyer—and of a Judge (Nov. 11, 2025) by Alan J. Borsuk
  5. “Behind the Scenes” of Organizing a Visit by an Appellate Court (Nov. 13, 2025) by Anna Fodor
  6. Seventh Circuit Day at Eckstein Hall “Felt Like This ‘Event’” and Offered Valuable Lessons (Nov. 18, 2025) by Alan J. Borsuk

Sincere thanks to all—the Court and its staff, those at the Law School, and members of the Milwaukee legal community—who contributed to this inspiring educational experience.

Continue ReadingCollecting Posts on Seventh Circuit Day

Seventh Circuit Day, Part 1: The Cases and Arguments

Judges at the bench
Seventh Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, and Judge Michael Brennan, in Marquette Law School’s Lubar Center on Sept. 25, 2025.

We would have welcomed the unusual opportunity for Eckstein Hall to serve for a day as a venue for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in any circumstances. That the particular occasion—September 25, 2025—was during the final days of the tenure of the Hon. Diane S. Sykes, L’84, as the court’s chief judge, made Seventh Circuit Day “extra special” for the Marquette Law School community.

The memorable day this semester had multiple components, as we will seek to capture in a series of blog posts during the next couple of weeks. The main event was the six oral arguments that the court held, all in cases on appeal from a federal district court in Wisconsin. The panel consisted of Chief Judge Sykes, who presided; the Hon. Frank H. Easterbrook, a judge of the court since 1985; and the Hon. Michael B. Brennan, who joined the court in 2018. Without rivaling Chief Judge Sykes’s claim on us (or ours on her), the latter two judges are familiar to (and with) Marquette Law School: to give only one example for each of their connections, Judge Easterbrook spoke at the groundbreaking for Eckstein Hall in 2008, and Judge Brennan taught here as an adjunct faculty member in the 1990s.

Continue ReadingSeventh Circuit Day, Part 1: The Cases and Arguments