What Restorative Justice Teaches Us in an Age of Artificial Intelligence
This is the last in a series of three blog posts, at the end of the academic year, by the director of the Law School’s Andrew Center for Restorative Justice.
In many ways, restorative justice is the opposite of a shortcut.
It asks law students to slow down, sit with discomfort, listen to one another, and resist the urge to immediately judge or fix. It requires presence. It requires vulnerability. And, perhaps most importantly, it requires humanity. In a time when technology, including artificial intelligence in particular, is reshaping how students learn and process information, restorative justice has become one of the most profound human experiences in my classroom at Marquette Law School, through the work of the Andrew Center for Restorative Justice.
Like many educators, I have watched students turn to technology for answers, for summaries, for efficiency. And I understand the appeal. The law is complex. The reading is dense. The days are long. But restorative justice has taught me that much important learning in a law school classroom is not found in the quickest answer, the perfect outline, or a polished response generated in seconds. It is found in the pause before speaking. In the courage to share a personal story. In the humility to listen.
