This blog has seen an extended discussion on the topic of literary characters and copyright law. It began with my post here, discussing the ongoing court case brought by J.D. Salinger over the unauthorized use of his Holden Caulfield character from The Catcher in the Rye, (Salinger v. Colting) and using a comparison to the novel Don Quixote to argue that copyright protection for literary characters should be eliminated. It was followed by Professor Bruce Boyden’s post here, defending the law’s grant of exclusive control over literary characters to the original author because it provides an economic incentive to the creative process. Professor Gordon Hylton responded with a post here, supporting my argument against copyright protection for literary characters by pointing to the post-publication history of Edward Bellamy’s popular novel Looking Backward. The discussion continued with Professor David Papke’s suggestion, in a post here, that the resolution of this debate may depend upon how we define what it means to be an “author,” and whether authorship is an individual act of creation or the collective act of an entire society. Finally, Professor Rick Esenberg contributed this post, discussing the crucial role of the reader in attributing meaning to the text, and implicitly questioning the idea that any author can control how his creation is used.
I would like to add to this discussion by sharing the comments of my brother, Jim Fallone, on the foregoing debate. I am aware, of course, of the popular movie Adaptation, “co-written” by screenwriter Charlie Kaufman and his fictitious brother Donald. In that movie, Charlie Kaufman takes the screenwriting process itself as the film’s subject, and plays with post-modern theories of authorship. Let me assure you that, unlike Donald Kaufman, Jim Fallone is a real person. Moreover, Jim Fallone has over 20 years of experience as an executive in the publishing industry, currently with Andrews McMeel Publishing in Kansas City, and is a published illustrator. While this experience makes him dependent upon copyright law for his meal ticket, it also gives him some valuable insights into the creation and marketing of literary characters.
What follows, then, are the comments of Jim Fallone: