More than 75% of each partisan group say a president must obey Supreme Court orders

Also:

• Opinion is close to evenly split on whether the Court is going out of its way to avoid making a ruling President Trump might disobey
• Opinion is evenly divided on approval of the overall work of the Supreme Court
• Very large partisan gap on approval of the Court’s work

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds a large majority—84% —of the public believes that a president must obey a ruling of the United States Supreme Court, while 16% say the president has the power to ignore a Court ruling. Despite this belief in the authority of the Court, 55% believe the Court is going out of its way to avoid making a ruling that President Donald Trump might refuse to obey, while 45% percent say the Court is not going out of its way to avoid ruling against the president.

More than three quarters of Republicans, independents, and Democrats each say that the president must obey a Supreme Court ruling, including 80% of Republicans, as shown in Table 1. In eight Marquette polls since 2019 that have asked this question, no partisan group has ever fallen below 70% in saying the president must obey the Court. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)

Table 1: President must obey the Supreme Court, by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Must obey Court
	The president has the power to ignore the ruling	The president is required to do as the ruling says
Republican	20	80
Independent	23	77
Democrat	8	92
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: If the Supreme Court rules against the president in a case, does the president have the power to ignore that ruling, or is the president required to do as the ruling says?

The survey was conducted Sept. 15-24, 2025, interviewing 1,043 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points.

A majority of Republicans, 69%, say the Court is not going out of its way to avoid ruling against Trump, while 58% of independents and 81% of Democrats say the Court is doing so.

Fifty-six percent of respondents say the decisions of the justices are based mainly on politics, while 44% say decisions are based mainly on the law. When this question was first asked in Marquette polling in 2019, 35% said justices were motivated mostly by politics, a figure that remained below 40% until January 2022. Since July 2023, in all 14 Marquette polls, 50% or more have said politics is the main motivation for decisions.

Those who think decisions are more political are more likely to say the Court is trying to avoid conflict with the president, and this relationship holds within each partisan group, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Court going out of way to avoid making a ruling president might disobey, by opinions on whether decisions mainly political or legal, by party ID

Among adults

Mainly politics or law	Avoiding ruling against Trump
	Is going out of its way to avoid	Is not avoiding a ruling
Republican
Mainly politics	46	54
Mainly the law	21	79
Independent
Mainly politics	69	31
Mainly the law	38	62
Democrat
Mainly politics	85	15
Mainly the law	70	30
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Do you think the U.S. Supreme Court is going out of its way to avoid making a ruling that President Donald Trump might refuse to obey?
Question: In general, what most often motivates Supreme Court justices’ decisions?

While the public strongly believes in the authority of the Supreme Court to rule against a president, people also think federal district courts have considerable power over presidents. Sixty-four percent say the president does not have more authority to ignore federal district court orders than rulings of the Supreme Court, while 36% say the president does have more authority concerning district court orders.

Those who think the president can ignore Supreme Court rulings are also more likely to say the president has additional authority to ignore orders of lower courts. Even among those who believe the president must obey the Supreme Court, 29% say there is more authority to ignore district courts. Table 3 presents this relationship.

Table 3: More able to ignore district court, by must obey Supreme Court

Among adults

Must obey Supreme Court	More able to ignore district court
	Has more authority to ignore	Does not have more authority to ignore
The president has the power to ignore the ruling	70	30
The president is required to do as the ruling says	29	71
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Does the president have more authority to ignore an order of a federal district court than a ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court?
Question: If the Supreme Court rules against the president in a case, does the president have the power to ignore that ruling, or is the president required to do as the ruling says?

District courts have issued a number of orders blocking executive actions since January. Sixty-seven percent of respondents in this poll say such orders are a proper use of judicial authority, while 33% say such orders are not proper. Republicans are evenly split on this question, while more than two-thirds of independents and more than 85% of Democrats say such orders are proper for courts to hand down. This relationship is shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Proper for courts to block executive orders, by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Proper for courts to block executive orders
	Yes	No
Republican	49	51
Independent	68	32
Democrat	86	14
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Federal courts have issued orders temporarily blocking a number of the Trump administration’s executive actions. Do you think such orders can be a proper use of judicial authority?

Approval of the Court

Approval of how the Supreme Court is handling its job is evenly divided, with 50% of the public approving and 50% disapproving. In July, 49% approved and 51% disapproved. Approval was between 39% and 48% throughout 2024 and has ranged from 49% to 54% so far in 2025, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5: United States Supreme Court approval

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Net	Approve	Disapprove
9/15-24/25	0	50	50
7/7-16/25	-2	49	51
5/5-15/25	6	53	47
3/17-27/25	8	54	46
1/27-2/6/25	2	51	49
12/2-11/24	-4	48	52
10/1-10/24	-10	45	55
7/24-8/1/24	-14	43	57
5/6-15/24	-22	39	61
3/18-28/24	-6	47	53
2/5-15/24	-20	40	60
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?

There are substantial partisan differences in views of the Supreme Court, with Republicans much more approving (81%) than independents (43%) or Democrats (19%). The trend in approval by party identification is shown in Table 6. Republicans have generally become more positive toward the Court since early 2024, while Democrats have generally become more negative. Independents have held consistently negative views of the Court, though they have become less negative over the last two years.

Table 6: United States Supreme Court approval, by party ID

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Net	Approve	Disapprove
Republican
9/15-24/25	62	81	19
7/7-16/25	62	81	19
5/5-15/25	56	78	22
3/17-27/25	58	79	21
1/27-2/6/25	68	84	16
12/2-11/24	48	74	26
10/1-10/24	36	68	32
7/24-8/1/24	34	67	33
5/6-15/24	14	57	43
3/18-28/24	28	64	36
Independent
9/15-24/25	-14	43	57
7/7-16/25	-10	45	55
5/5-15/25	-14	43	57
3/17-27/25	-10	45	55
1/27-2/6/25	-8	46	54
12/2-11/24	-8	46	54
10/1-10/24	-18	41	59
7/24-8/1/24	-22	39	61
5/6-15/24	-48	26	74
3/18-28/24	-24	38	62
Democrat
9/15-24/25	-62	19	81
7/7-16/25	-64	18	82
5/5-15/25	-38	31	69
3/17-27/25	-38	31	69
1/27-2/6/25	-62	19	81
12/2-11/24	-58	21	79
10/1-10/24	-54	23	77
7/24-8/1/24	-58	21	79
5/6-15/24	-54	23	77
3/18-28/24	-38	31	69
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?

Twenty-two percent say they have heard or read a lot about the Court over the last month, 61% have heard a little, and 18% have heard nothing at all. Attention is down from July, following the late-June flurry of major decisions, when 34% had heard a lot about the court. Table 7 shows the attention cycle over the last year, peaking in the summer and declining in fall and winter.

Table 7: Attention to news about the Supreme Court

Among adults

Poll dates	Hear or read about the Court
	A lot	A little	Nothing at all
9/15-24/25	22	61	18
7/7-16/25	34	51	15
5/5-15/25	25	60	15
3/17-27/25	25	63	12
1/27-2/6/25	17	68	14
12/2-11/24	17	64	18
10/1-10/24	19	61	20
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Thinking about the last month only, how much have you heard or read about the U.S. Supreme Court?

Those who hear more news about the Court tend more to be disapproving, while the group of those who have heard the least is most approving, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Approval, by attention to news about the Supreme Court

Among adults

Heard about Court	Approval
	Approve	Disapprove
A lot	35	65
A little	52	48
Nothing at all	62	38
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?
Question: Thinking about the last month only, how much have you heard or read about the U.S. Supreme Court?

There are modest partisan differences in attention to news about the Court, with 16% of Republicans who heard a lot, compared to 19% of independents and 29% of Democrats. Among independents and Democrats, those who hear less are more approving than those who hear more. For Republicans, who are strongly approving regardless of attention, the pattern is inconsistent. These results are shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Attention to news and approval of the Court, by party ID

Among adults

Heard about Court	Approval
	Net	Approve	Disapprove
Republican
A lot	54	77	23
A little	70	85	15
Nothing at all	46	73	27
Independent
A lot	-48	26	74
A little	-14	43	57
Nothing at all	14	57	43
Democrat
A lot	-76	12	88
A little	-64	18	82
Nothing at all	-8	46	54
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Supreme Court is handling its job?
Question: Thinking about the last month only, how much have you heard or read about the U.S. Supreme Court?

Favorability to Chief Justice Roberts

In keeping with the generally low attention to news about the Court, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is unfamiliar to 55%, who say they haven’t heard enough about him to have a favorable or unfavorable opinion. The question did not identify Roberts as the Chief Justice but presented his name in a list along with political leaders. Roberts is viewed favorably by 17% and unfavorably by 28%. Republicans are less familiar with Roberts than are Democrats, though on balance Republicans are favorable, while Democrats and independents are unfavorable, as shown in Table 10.

Table 10: Favorability to John G. Roberts, Jr., by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Favorability
	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Republican	28	13	59
Independent	10	34	55
Democrat	7	43	50
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [John G. Roberts, Jr.] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Roberts is viewed positively by respondents who identify themselves as either very or somewhat conservative, and is viewed unfavorably by self-described moderates and those who are somewhat or very liberal. There is modest variation in familiarity with Roberts by ideological identification, with between 49% and 58% saying they haven’t heard enough to have an opinion. This relationship is shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Favorability to John G. Roberts, Jr., by ideological identification

Among adults

Ideological identification	Favorability
	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Very conservative	30	18	52
Somewhat conservative	30	11	58
Moderate	10	34	57
Somewhat liberal	7	42	52
Very liberal	5	46	49
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [John G. Roberts, Jr.] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?
Question: Generally speaking, how would you describe your political views?

Upcoming cases before the Court

As the Court begins its new term on Oct. 6, it has a number of cases set for argument. In one case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held the president’s power to impose tariffs on imports to be substantially more limited than the government has maintained. Asked whether the Supreme Court should uphold this limitation on presidential power, 61% say the decision should be upheld, while 39% say the decision should be overturned. Republicans are strongly in favor of overturning this ruling, 69%, while 75% of independents and 88% of Democrats want the ruling upheld.

Opinion about this case is also related to beliefs about whether tariffs help or hurt the economy. Within each partisan category, those who think tariffs help the economy are more in favor of overturning the appeals court decision, while those who think tariffs hurt the economy are more likely to want the Supreme Court to uphold the limits on presidential authority, as shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Limiting president’s tariff power, by economic effect of tariffs and by party ID

Among adults

Economic impact of tariffs	Uphold or overturn limits on tariff power
	Uphold the appeals court ruling that limits the president’s authority to impose tariffs	Overturn the appeals court ruling and hold that the President has the authority to set tariffs
Republican
Helps U.S. economy	12	88
Doesn’t make much difference	37	63
Hurts U.S. economy	70	30
Independent
Helps U.S. economy	37	63
Doesn’t make much difference	62	38
Hurts U.S. economy	85	15
Democrat
Helps U.S. economy	44	56
Doesn’t make much difference	56	44
Hurts U.S. economy	93	6
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that substantially limits the president’s authority to impose tariffs on imports to the United States. This decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?
Question: In general, do you think imposing tariffs or fees on products imported from other countries helps the U.S. economy, hurts the economy, or doesn’t make much of a difference either way?

Another appeals court ruled that the president exceeded his authority under the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 law, in ordering the deportation of some Venezuelans in the U.S. illegally. Fifty-six percent say the Supreme Court should uphold this ruling, and 44% think it should overturn the appeals court decision. A majority of Republicans, 77%, think the appeals court ruling should be overturned, while majorities of independents, 68%, and Democrats, 86%, think it should be upheld.

Seventy-six percent of those who approve of how Trump is handling immigration favor overturning the appeals court ruling, while those who disapprove of Trump’s immigration policies strongly favor upholding the ruling, 82%. This relationship remains strong within categories of partisanship, as shown in Table 13.

Table 13: Hold president lacked authority under the Alien Enemies Act to order certain deportations, by approval of Trump on immigration and by party ID

Among adults

Trump approval on immigration	Uphold or overturn limits on deportation authority
	Uphold the appeals court ruling that the president exceeded his authority	Overturn the appeals court ruling and hold that the president can invoke the Alien Enemies Act
Republican
Approve	13	87
Disapprove	66	34
Independent
Approve	60	40
Disapprove	71	29
Democrat
Approve	61	39
Disapprove	90	10
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that the president exceeded his authority under the Alien Enemies Act in ordering the deportation of some Venezuelans in the U.S. illegally. This decision is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?
Question: [Immigration] Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling each of the following issues?

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments asking whether state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating on girls’ and women’s sports teams violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause. Sixty-two percent think the Court should rule these laws are constitutional, while 38% think the Court should rule the laws are unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection.

Majorities of Republicans, 81%, and independents, 57%, think the Court should uphold these laws, while a majority of Democrats, 56%, think they should be struck down.

In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that federal civil rights laws protect gay and transgender workers from job discrimination, a ruling that is favored by 79% and opposed by 21%. A majority of those favoring the anti-job-discrimination ruling nonetheless favor upholding state bans on transgender girls and women participating on girls’ and women’s sports teams, 60%. A larger percentage, 71%, of those opposed to the anti-discrimination ruling favor upholding the state bans.

The Court has scheduled arguments in a case asking whether the creation of a second majority Black congressional district in Louisiana is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander or whether it is properly required by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Forty-eight percent say the Court should rule this is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, while 52% say it is properly required by the Voting Rights Act.

There is a partisan divide in views of this case, with 64% of Republicans saying the creation of a Black district is unconstitutional. A small majority of independents, 55%, think it is proper under the Voting Rights Act, as do a larger majority of Democrats, 68%.

There are differences of opinion by race and ethnicity on this issue as well, as shown in Table 14. A small majority of white respondents say creating Black majority districts is racial gerrymandering, while majorities of Black and Hispanic respondents say the districts are required by the Voting Rights Act. Those of other or multiple races are evenly divided.

Table 14: Creation of Black-majority districts, by race and ethnicity

Among adults

Race and ethnicity	Creation of Black-majority districts
	The creation of a second majority-Black district is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander	The second majority-Black district is required by the Voting Rights Act of 1965
White	54	46
Black	32	68
Hispanic	40	60
Other/Multiple	49	51
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case asking whether the creation of a second majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, or whether, instead, it was properly required by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. How do you think the Supreme Court should rule?

Confidence in institutions

Confidence in several institutions is summarized in Table 15. The police have the highest net (high confidence minus low confidence) ratings, followed at some distance by the FBI. The Federal Reserve Board has a slightly positive net rating, while the Centers for Disease Control and the U.S. Department of Justice are mildly negative. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has a substantially net negative rating.

Table 15: Confidence in institutions

Among adults

Institution	Confidence
	Net high-low	Great deal/quite a lot	Some	Very little/None at all
The police	25	45	35	20
The FBI	6	35	36	29
The Federal Reserve Board	2	29	45	26
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)	-7	28	37	35
The U.S. Department of Justice	-8	27	38	35
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)	-17	31	22	47
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Here is a list of institutions in American society. How much confidence do you have in each one?

Confidence in the Federal Reserve Board, the CDC, and ICE has not been asked in previous Marquette polls, while questions about the police, FBI, and Department of Justice allow comparisons over time.

Confidence in the police has remained quite positive since 2020, with small fluctuations, as shown in Table 16.

Table 16: Confidence in the police

Among adults

Poll dates	Confidence
	Net high-low	Great deal/quite a lot	Some	Very little/None at all
9/8-15/20	30	49	32	19
9/7-14/22	31	51	28	20
11/15-22/22	27	48	30	21
1/9-20/23	29	50	29	21
3/13-22/23	21	44	33	23
9/15-24/25	25	45	35	20
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [The police] Here is a list of institutions in American society. How much confidence do you have in each one?

Confidence in the FBI is slightly higher than in January 2025, though lower than from September 2022 to January 2023, as shown in Table 17.

Table 17: Confidence in the FBI

Among adults

Poll dates	Confidence
	Net high-low	Great deal/quite a lot	Some	Very little/None at all
9/7-14/22	18	44	30	26
11/15-22/22	12	39	34	27
1/9-20/23	11	39	32	28
3/13-22/23	3	34	35	31
12/2-11/24	2	32	38	30
1/27-2/6/25	-1	29	42	30
9/15-24/25	6	35	36	29
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [The FBI] Here is a list of institutions in American society. How much confidence do you have in each one?

Confidence in the U.S. Department of Justice has been consistently net negative since 2023, and is slightly less negative than in January 2025, as shown in Table 18.

Table 18: Confidence in the U.S. Department of Justice

Among adults

Poll dates	Confidence
	Net high-low	Great deal/quite a lot	Some	Very little/None at all
7/7-12/23	-16	25	34	41
9/18-25/23	-5	30	35	35
11/2-7/23	-8	27	38	35
2/5-15/24	-13	25	36	38
3/18-28/24	-9	27	37	36
5/6-15/24	-15	23	39	38
12/2-11/24	-10	24	41	34
1/27-2/6/25	-14	22	41	36
9/15-24/25	-8	27	38	35
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [The U.S. Department of Justice] Here is a list of institutions in American society. How much confidence do you have in each one?

Perceived ideological leaning of the Court

In September, 22% say they would describe the Supreme Court as “very conservative,” 38% would describe it as “somewhat conservative,” 32% would call the Court “moderate,” 7% see the Court as “somewhat liberal,” and 2% believe it is “very liberal.”

Views of the Court have shifted to the right since 2019, with fewer seeing the Court as moderate and more as conservative or very conservative, as shown in Table 19. The shift in perceptions is most apparent in May and July 2022, around the time of the Dobbs decision overturning Roe vs Wade.

Table 19: Perceived ideological leaning of the Court, 2019-2025

Among adults

Poll dates	Perceived ideology
	Very conservative	Somewhat conservative	Moderate	Somewhat liberal	Very liberal
9/15-24/25	22	38	32	7	2
7/7-16/25	25	37	27	8	3
10/1-10/24	24	35	32	7	2
7/24-8/1/24	28	30	32	7	3
5/6-15/24	25	32	31	10	2
3/18-28/24	25	32	33	8	3
2/5-15/24	21	34	33	7	5
11/2-7/23	21	35	32	7	5
9/18-25/23	20	37	32	7	3
7/7-12/23	27	35	28	7	3
5/8-18/23	24	33	30	10	3
3/13-22/23	23	35	34	6	2
1/9-20/23	22	37	31	8	2
11/15-22/22	25	36	32	6	2
9/7-14/22	29	35	27	5	3
7/5-12/22	34	33	21	7	3
5/9-19/22	23	33	34	8	2
3/14-24/22	15	37	36	10	2
1/10-21/22	17	38	35	8	2
11/1-10/21	15	35	39	8	1
9/7-16/21	16	35	40	7	2
7/16-26/21	13	37	42	6	1
9/8-15/20	5	30	54	9	2
9/3-13/19	5	33	50	9	3
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: In general, would you describe each of the following… The U.S. Supreme Court

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted Sept. 15-24, 2025, interviewing 1,043 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points.

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on views of the Trump administration and policy issues) were released previously, on October 1. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available on the Marquette Law Poll website.

Wording of questions about recent and pending Supreme Court cases

These items do not attempt to exactly frame the particular issues in specific cases but rather address the topic in more general terms.

The wording of questions about cases includes:

Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia

• In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that a federal civil rights law protects gay and transgender workers from workplace discrimination. How much do you favor or oppose this decision?

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

• The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case asking whether state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating on girls’ and women’s sports teams violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause.

Louisiana v. Callais

• The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case asking whether the creation of a second majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, or whether, instead, it was properly required by the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Learning Resources v. Trump

• A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that substantially limits the president’s authority to impose tariffs on imports to the United States. This decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court.

W.M.M. v. Trump, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

• A federal appeals court has issued a ruling that the president exceeded his authority under the Alien Enemies Act in ordering the deportation of some Venezuelans in the U.S. illegally. This decision is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Americans are overall pessimistic on reducing intense political conflict; half of those polled say heated language by leaders makes violence more likely

Also:

• 58% say it is always unacceptable to be happy about the death of someone they oppose; 89% say political violence is always unjustified
• Majorities of all partisan groups view tariffs as a bargaining chip for Trump, not policies he intends to enforce
• Approval of Trump’s job performance continues to slowly decline, with 43% approval now
• Majorities think that Trump policies increase inflation and that inflation will increase in the next year

Please note: Complete Poll results and methodology information can be found online at law.marquette.edu/poll

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey conducted following the shooting death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on Sept. 10, 2025, finds that 38% of Americans think the threat of violence against political leaders is a very big problem, with an additional 38% who say it is a moderately big problem. It is seen as a small problem by 19% and not a problem at all by just 4%.

Half of Republicans say the threat of violence is a very big problem, while 27% of independents and 30% of Democrats see it as a very big problem.

Asked which is a bigger problem, 27% of respondents say left-wing violence while 22% say right-wing violence. Just over half, 51%, say both are equally a problem. Perception of this is dramatically different for each party. Among Republicans, 57% say left-wing violence is the bigger problem and just 3% say right-wing violence is more of a problem. Democrats see a near mirror image, with 50% who see right-wing violence as the bigger problem and only 4% who say left-wing violence is the greater problem. Independents see equal blame for both sides, with 87% saying left and right are equally a problem, 4% saying the left is more of the problem, and 9% saying the right is the bigger problem.

The survey was conducted Sept. 15-24, 2025, interviewing 1,043 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points.

Just under half, 49%, say elected officials using heated or aggressive language to talk about political opponents makes political violence much more likely. Thirty-seven percent say this makes violence somewhat more likely, and 14% say such rhetoric does not make political violence at all more likely. While Republicans view the threat of political violence as a bigger problem than do Democrats, perceptions between the parties are reversed on the question of aggressive political language and violence. Among Republicans, 39% say aggressive political speech makes violence much more likely, while 63% of Democrats say such speech makes political violence much more likely. Among independents, 40% say aggressive language makes violence much more likely.

Americans are pessimistic about finding a way to reduce intense political conflict and violence, with 31% saying a path to reduction can be found and 69% saying the country is so divided that intense political conflict and violence are going to escalate. A majority of each party and of independents see escalating conflict as likely, with 63% of Republicans, 72% of independents, and 73% of Democrats saying violence is going to escalate.

A majority of Americans, 58%, say it is always unacceptable for a person to be happy about the death of a public figure they oppose, with 29% saying this is usually unacceptable, 9% saying it is usually acceptable, and 4% saying it is always acceptable. Seventy-eight percent of Republicans say such happiness is always unacceptable, 49% of independents say it is always unacceptable, and 41% of Democrats say it is always unacceptable. The number of those likely to say pleasure over the death of a political opponent is always unacceptable rises with age, with people under 30 years old least likely to say pleasure over the death of a political opponent is always unacceptable, at 45%. The figure rises to 51% among those 30-44, 61% among those 45-59, and 69% for those 60 or older.

Political ideology shows a strong gradient in the acceptability of feeling happy over the death of a political opponent. Among those who describe themselves as very liberal, 26% say such happiness is always unacceptable, as do 40% who say they are somewhat liberal. Among self-described moderates, 56% say this is always unacceptable. Of those who say they are somewhat conservative, 71% say this is always unacceptable, as do 80% of those who are very conservative.

A very large majority, 89%, say violence is never justified in order to achieve political goals, and 11% say violence can sometimes be justified. A majority of each partisan group, age group, and ideological group also say violence is never justified. The minority view, that violence can sometimes be justified, is larger among Democrats (15%) than among Republicans (6%); among those under 30 years old (14%) than among those 60 or older (5%); and among those who describe themselves as very liberal (25%) than among those who say they are very conservative (10%).

Respondents were asked how much they knew about Charlie Kirk before his shooting death. Twenty-three percent say they knew a lot about him, while 44% report having known a little and 33% saying they knew nothing at all about him. Kirk was better known among Republicans, 33% of whom say they knew a lot, than among independents (11%) and Democrats (18%). Kirk’s efforts to persuade and mobilize young voters are reflected in the finding that 30% of those 18-30 years old say they knew a lot about him, compared to 23% among those 30-44 and 20% for those 45-59. Among those 60 years old or older, 22% say they knew a lot about Kirk prior to his death. Kirk was especially well known among those who describe themselves as very conservative, 45% of whom said they knew a lot about him. He was also relatively well known among those self-described as very liberal, 32%, while only 12% of moderates said they knew a lot about him before his death.

A majority of respondents, 53%, approve of the way President Donald Trump has responded to the shooting death of Kirk, while 47% disapprove. Views of Trump’s response differ sharply by party, with 89% of Republicans approving, compared to 39% of independents and 18% of Democrats.

Presidential approval

Approval of Trump’s overall job performance in September stands at 43%, with disapproval at 57%. This continues a series of small declines since Trump took office in January, when 48% approved and 52% disapproved. The full trend is shown in Table 1. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages.)

Table 1: Trump approval

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Net	Approve	Disapprove
9/15-24/25	-14	43	57
7/7-16/25	-10	45	55
5/5-15/25	-8	46	54
3/17-27/25	-8	46	54
1/27-2/6/25	-4	48	52
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

Approval remains strong among Republicans at 81%, although this is a decline of 8 percentage points since January, and shows almost 1-in-5 Republicans now disapprove. Among independents, 27% approve, a decline of 10 percentage points since January. Democratic approval is 8%, 1 point lower than in January. The full trend by party is shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Trump approval, by party ID

Among adults

Poll dates	Approval
	Net	Approve	Disapprove
Republican
9/15-24/25	62	81	19
7/7-16/25	72	86	14
5/5-15/25	74	87	13
3/17-27/25	74	87	13
1/27-2/6/25	78	89	11
Independent
9/15-24/25	-46	27	73
7/7-16/25	-24	38	62
5/5-15/25	-38	31	69
3/17-27/25	-35	32	67
1/27-2/6/25	-26	37	63
Democrat
9/15-24/25	-84	8	92
7/7-16/25	-86	7	93
5/5-15/25	-84	8	92
3/17-27/25	-80	10	90
1/27-2/6/25	-82	9	91
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

Approval of Trump varies substantially across individual issues, with his highest approval of 55% for handling border security, followed by his response to the Kirk shooting at 53%. And net approval is negative on all other issues, with Trump’s lowest approval rating being 28% for handling information about Jeffrey Epstein, one percentage point below the 29% approval for dealing with inflation and the cost of living. In between these extremes, net approval of Trump’s job performance is negative on each issue, meaning that more disapprove than approve of his handling of immigration, sending National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., his job performance overall, the economy, tariffs, the Israel-Hamas war, and the Russia-Ukraine war (to maintain the order of his best-to-worst scores on those items surveyed). Across all issues, net approval ranges from +10 (border security) to -44 (Epstein) percentage points, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Trump job approval across issues

Among adults

Issue	Net	Approve	Disapprove
Border security	10	55	45
Response to Kirk shooting	6	53	47
Immigration	-8	46	54
Sending National Guard to D.C.	-10	45	55
Overall	-14	43	57
The economy	-20	40	60
Tariffs	-24	38	62
Israel-Hamas war	-32	34	66
Russia-Ukraine war	-34	33	67
Inflation/cost of living	-42	29	71
Information about Jeffrey Epstein	-44	28	72
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling each of the following issues?

The variation in approval across issues is substantially driven by variation in approval among Republicans and independents, with less variation from Democrats. Among all adults, approval ranges from 55% to 28%. Among Republicans the range is from 89% to 46%, a spread of 43 percentage points. Independents vary less, from 46% to 14%, a variation of 32 percentage points. For Democrats, the range is smaller still, from 23% to 5%, a difference of 18 percentage points. A majority of Republicans approve of Trump’s handling of all issues except information about Jeffrey Epstein, while Trump fails to win majority approval on any issue among independents, and he holds less than 25% support on all issues among Democrats.

Table 4 shows approval on each issue by party identification, as well as approval by all adults for comparison. The table is presented in order of approval among all adults.

Table 4: Trump job approval across issues, by party identification

Among adults

Issue	All adults approve	Rep approve	Ind approve	Dem approve
Border security	55	88	46	23
Response to Kirk shooting	53	89	39	18
Immigration	46	82	31	12
Sending National Guard to D.C.	45	80	34	12
Overall	43	81	27	8
The economy	40	73	24	10
Tariffs	38	72	24	8
Israel-Hamas war	34	65	14	9
Russia-Ukraine war	33	61	20	8
Inflation/cost of living	29	57	14	5
Information about Jeffrey Epstein	28	46	26	9
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
Question: Overall, how much do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling each of the following issues?

Opinion of past presidents

The Marquette Law School Poll asked favorability ratings for each president from Ronald Reagan to Trump. Reagan has the most positive net favorability at +28 points, followed by George H. W. Bush and Barack Obama, each with net favorability of +17 points. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush also have positive net favorability, each at +8 points. The current president, Trump, has a net negative favorability of -15 points, while Joe Biden has the lowest net rating, -24 points. The two earliest presidents, Reagan and George H. W. Bush, both have relatively high percentages saying they haven’t heard enough about them to have an opinion, as do Clinton and George W. Bush to a lesser degree.

These ratings are shown in Table 5, arranged in order of net favorability.

Table 5: Favorability of past presidents

Among adults

President	Net favorability	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Ronald Reagan	28	58	30	12
George H. W. Bush	17	53	36	10
Barack Obama	17	57	40	2
Bill Clinton	8	51	43	7
George W. Bush	8	50	42	8
Donald Trump	-15	42	57	1
Joe Biden	-24	37	61	2
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following former presidents or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?
Question: [Donald Trump] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Table 6 shows favorability by party identification. Republicans are net favorable to only Republican presidents and unfavorable to all Democratic presidents. Likewise, Democrats have positive net favorability to only Democratic presidents and are net negative to all Republican presidents. In contrast, independents rate some presidents of both parties positively overall and rate one president of each party (Biden and Trump) negatively overall. Independents are much more likely than either partisan camp to say they don’t have an opinion, especially of earlier presidents.

Table 6: Favorability of past presidents, by party identification

Among adults

President	Net favorability	Favorable	Unfavorable	Haven’t heard enough
Republican
Ronald Reagan	75	84	9	7
Donald Trump	58	79	21	0
George H. W. Bush	44	68	24	7
George W. Bush	33	64	31	5
Bill Clinton	-24	36	60	3
Barack Obama	-46	27	73	0
Joe Biden	-86	7	93	0
Independent
Barack Obama	33	62	29	9
Ronald Reagan	14	45	31	25
Bill Clinton	9	46	37	17
George H. W. Bush	5	44	39	17
George W. Bush	0	42	42	16
Joe Biden	-32	29	61	9
Donald Trump	-45	25	70	5
Democrat
Barack Obama	79	89	10	1
Joe Biden	47	73	26	1
Bill Clinton	42	68	26	6
George H. W. Bush	-7	41	48	10
George W. Bush	-14	39	53	7
Ronald Reagan	-17	36	53	11
Donald Trump	-81	9	90	1
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following former presidents or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?
Question: [Donald Trump] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

Among Republicans, Reagan has the highest net favorability rating, +75, followed by Trump at +58. Independents give Obama their highest net rating, +33, followed by Reagan at +14. Democrats also give top marks to Obama at +79, followed by Biden at +47.

Republicans give their lowest rating to Biden, -86, while independents and Democrats place Trump last, -45 and -81, respectively.

Most important issue

Inflation and the cost of living remain the most important concerns for the public, as they have been all year in Marquette polls. In September, 40% cite inflation as the issue that matters most to them, an increase from 34% in July. The economy is the second greatest concern, with 19% saying it is the most important issue to them, up from 16% in July. Immigration and border security is the third most cited problem at 10%, a slight decrease from July when it was 13%. The full set of top concerns is shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Most important issue

Among adults

Issue
	Percent most important
Inflation and the cost of living	40
The economy	19
Immigration and border security	10
Medicare & Social Security	9
Health care	7
Crime	4
The size of the federal deficit	3
Abortion policy	2
The war between Russia and Ukraine	2
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Which one of the following issues matters MOST to you right now?

Tariffs, inflation and the economy

By a 58% to 29% margin, the public thinks tariffs hurt rather than help the economy, while 13% say tariffs make no difference. There has been little change in opinion of tariffs since March, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Impact of tariffs on economy

Among adults

Poll dates	Impact of imposing tariffs
	Helps U.S. economy	Hurts U.S. economy	Doesn’t make much difference
9/15-24/25	29	58	13
7/7-16/25	28	59	12
5/5-15/25	32	58	10
3/17-27/25	28	58	14
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: In general, do you think imposing tariffs or fees on products imported from other countries helps the U.S. economy, hurts the economy, or doesn’t make much of a difference either way?

While majorities think tariffs hurt the economy and disapprove of Trump’s handling of tariffs, 63% think tariffs are bargaining chips Trump is looking to exchange for concessions from other countries, while 37% think they are policies he intends to enforce. Majorities of each partisan group think the tariffs are bargaining chips, a view held by 60% of Republicans, 63% of independents, and 66% of Democrats.

Sixty percent of Americans believe Trump’s policies will increase inflation, while 25% think they will decrease inflation and 15% think they will have no effect. This view has shifted from near parity in December 2024, when 45% thought his policies would increase inflation and 41% thought the policies would decrease inflation. Opinion has shifted steadily to more pessimism about inflation since December, as shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Trump policy effect on inflation

Among adults

Poll dates	Effect on inflation
	Decrease inflation	Increase inflation	Have no effect on inflation
9/15-24/25	25	60	15
7/7-16/25	28	60	12
5/5-15/25	28	61	10
3/17-27/25	30	58	12
1/27-2/6/25	36	49	15
12/2-11/24	41	45	14
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Do you think Trump’s policy proposals will decrease inflation, increase inflation, or have no effect on inflation?

Adults nationwide see the prices of groceries rising over the last six months, with 42% saying they have gone up a lot and 32% saying they’ve gone up a little. Sixteen percent say grocery prices have stayed about the same, while 9% say they have gone down a little or a lot. While majorities of all partisan groups say that grocery prices have gone up, there is a partisan gap, with 18% of Republicans saying prices have gone down, a view shared by 8% of independents and by 1% of Democrats. Republicans are also more likely to say grocery prices have stayed about the same than are independents or Democrats. These views are shown by party identification in Table 10.

Table 10: Grocery prices, by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Grocery prices
	Gone down	Stayed about the same	Gone up
Republican	18	24	58
Independent	8	12	81
Democrat	1	10	89
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: How has the price you pay for groceries changed over the last six months?

Expectations of increasing inflation over the next year have inched up since May, with 67% now saying they expect increased inflation, up from 63% saying this in May. Twelve percent expect a decrease in inflation, down from 20% in May. The trend is shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Inflation expectation over next 12 months

Among adults

	Inflation expectation
Poll dates	Increase	Decrease	Stay about the same
9/15-24/25	67	12	20
7/7-16/25	65	18	18
5/5-15/25	63	20	17
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Over the next 12 months do you think inflation and the cost of living will increase, decrease or stay about the same?

In September, 20% say they are personally better off than a year ago, while 35% say they are worse off and 45% say they are about the same. In July, 24% said they were better off and 32% said worse off. The full trend since December is shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Better or worse off than a year before

Among adults

Poll dates	Better or worse off
	Better	About the same	Worse
9/15-24/25	20	45	35
7/7-16/25	24	44	32
5/5-15/25	23	43	34
3/17-27/25	24	44	32
1/27-2/6/25	19	56	25
12/2-11/24	18	49	33
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Would you say you personally are better off, about the same, or worse off than you were a year ago?

Views of the state of the nation’s economy have varied modestly since December, with a small decline from July. In September, 30% said the economy was excellent or good, 50% said it was not so good, and 20% said the economy was poor. In July, 35% said excellent or good, 44% said not so good, and 21% said poor. The full history since December is shown in Table 13.

Table 13: State of the national economy

Among adults

Poll dates	National economy
	Excellent/Good	Not so good	Poor
9/15-24/25	30	50	20
7/7-16/25	35	44	21
5/5-15/25	32	47	22
3/17-27/25	26	53	20
1/27-2/6/25	27	58	15
12/2-11/24	29	50	21
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: How would you describe the state of the nation’s economy these days?

The Federal Reserve Board, Centers for Disease Control

The effort by Trump to remove a member of the Federal Reserve Board has received modest attention from the public, with 30% saying they have heard or read a lot about this, 38% saying they have heard a little, and 31% saying they have heard nothing at all.

A majority of the public, 79%, say the Federal Reserve Board should be independent of political control, while 21% say the president should have more influence over setting interest rates and monetary policy. A majority of each partisan group supports an independent Federal Reserve, with 65% of Republicans, 81% of independents, and 94% of Democrats favoring independence.

Confidence in the Federal Reserve is evenly divided between those with high confidence, 29%, and those with low confidence, 26%. A substantial percentage say they have some confidence, 45%. Those with greater confidence are more strongly in favor of independence for the Federal Reserve, though a majority of even those with the least confidence say the board should be independent of political control, as shown in Table 14.

Table 14: Independence of Federal Reserve, by confidence in it

Among adults

Confidence in Federal Reserve	Independent or presidential influence
	Should be independent	President should have more influence
Great deal/quite a lot	90	10
Some	79	21
Very little/None at all	68	32
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [Federal Reserve Board] Here is a list of institutions in American society. How much confidence do you have in each one?
Question: Should the Federal Reserve Board, which sets interest rates and monetary policy, be independent of political control, or should the President have more influence over setting interest rates and monetary policy?

The firing of the director of the Centers for Disease Control in late August received modest attention from the public. Twenty-nine percent say they heard or read a lot about this, 45% heard a little, and 26% heard nothing at all.

In terms of confidence in the CDC, 28% express high confidence, 37% have some confidence, and 35% say they have little or no confidence in the CDC. Confidence in the CDC is only slightly related to partisanship, with 27% of Republicans saying they have high confidence and 32% of Democrats saying the same. Table 15 shows the full relationship of confidence with party identification.

Table 15: Confidence in Centers for Disease Control, by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Confidence in CDC
	Great deal/quite a lot	Some	Very little/None at all
Republican	27	41	33
Independent	21	42	37
Democrat	32	31	37
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [Centers for Disease Control (CDC)] Here is a list of institutions in American society. How much confidence do you have in each one?

Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is viewed favorably by 39% and unfavorably by 52%, with 9% who say they haven’t heard enough. Attention to news about the firing of the CDC director was more strongly associated with opinions of Kennedy, with only 18% of those favorable to Kennedy having heard a lot about the firing, while 42% of those unfavorable to Kennedy had heard a lot. Table 16 presents this full relationship.

Table 16: Heard about CDC firing, by favorability to Kennedy

Among adults

Kennedy favorability	Heard about CDC firing
	A lot	A little	Nothing at all
Favorable	18	53	29
Unfavorable	42	42	16
Haven’t heard enough	2	31	67
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: [The firing of the director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)] Here are some recent topics in the news. How much have you heard or read about each of these?
Question: [Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.] Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people or haven’t you heard enough yet to have an opinion?

The parties, a government shutdown, and redistricting

Approval of how Republicans in Congress are handling their job is at 42%, with disapproval at 58%, unchanged from July. Approval of Democrats in Congress is 31% with disapproval at 69%. In July, 34% approved of the Democrats and 66% disapproved.

Views of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” have hardly changed since July, with 42% who support the bill and 58% who oppose it. That represents a one-percentage-point increase in support and a one-point decline in opposition from July.

As of mid-September when this poll was taken, 13% thought a federal government shutdown on October 1 was very likely, 42% thought it somewhat likely, 37% said it was not too likely, and 8% said it was not at all likely. Democrats were somewhat more inclined than Republicans or independents to think a shutdown was likely, as shown in Table 17.

Table 17: Likelihood of government shutdown, by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Likelihood of shutdown
	Very likely	Somewhat likely	Not too likely	Not at all likely
Republican	8	36	46	9
Independent	14	41	37	8
Democrat	17	49	27	6
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: How likely is it that there will be a shutdown of the federal government on October 1 due to  failure to pass a budget agreement?

A majority of the public, and a majority of each party, are opposed to the mid-decade redistricting that is taking place in several states. Redistricting is opposed by 70% and favored by 30%. Opinion of redistricting by party is shown in Table 18, with more support among Republicans but majority opposition even in Republican ranks.

Table 18: Redistricting, by party identification

Among adults

Party ID	Opinion of redistricting
	Favor	Oppose
Republican	38	62
Independent	31	69
Democrat	20	80
Marquette Law School Poll, national survey, Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Texas has redrawn its congressional districts to create more seats Republicans are likely to win. California is considering doing the same to create more seats Democrats are likely to win. Several other states are also considering drawing new districts. Do you favor or oppose states, outside the normal ten-year census cycle, redrawing their congressional districts to make them as advantageous as possible for the party with the majority in the state?

Crime and deployment of federal forces

Just over half of Americans, 53%, say they are very or somewhat concerned about crime in their community, with 20% very concerned and 33% somewhat concerned. Thirty-seven percent are not too concerned, and 10% are not at all concerned.

As for their personal safety, 73% say they feel safe from crime when going about their daily activities, while 27% say they are worried about their safety.

Concern with gun violence in their community is slightly higher than with crime, with 28% very concerned, 28% somewhat concerned, 31% not too concerned, and 14% not at all concerned.

Fifty-one percent said they had heard a lot about the deployment of the National Guard and federal agents to Washington, D.C., while 40% had heard a little and 8% had heard nothing at all.

As for deploying the National Guard to the respondent’s community, 25% said they would like such a federal presence, while 75% said their community would be better off without such federal involvement.

Opinion is mixed on the effect on crime in Washington, D.C., due to the presence of the National Guard and federal agents, with 44% who say this has reduced crime in Washington and 56% who say it hasn’t made much difference.

Foreign affairs

Fifty-four percent say they have read or heard a lot about the war between Russia and Ukraine, with 39% who say they have heard a little and 8% who say they have heard nothing at all.

Support for aid to Ukraine in its war with Russia has increased since December, when 25% said the United States was not giving enough support and 42% said America was giving too much aid. In September these figures have reversed, with 38% now saying the United States should give more aid and 28% saying the country is giving too much aid. This is the first time in Marquette polling that more people say the United States should give more aid than say America is giving too much. The full trend in opinion about aid to Ukraine is shown in Table 19.

Table 19: Aid to Ukraine

Among adults

Poll dates	Aid
	Net not enough-too much	Too much support	Not enough support	About the right amount of support
9/15-24/25	10	28	38	34
3/17-27/25	-4	37	33	29
1/27-2/6/25	-19	41	22	37
12/2-11/24	-17	42	25	34
10/1-10/24	-16	38	22	40
5/6-15/24	-14	39	25	36
3/18-28/24	-5	36	31	33
2/5-15/24	-13	38	25	37
11/2-7/23	-17	38	21	40
9/18-25/23	-15	37	22	41
7/7-12/23	-12	34	22	44
5/8-18/23	-11	34	23	43
3/13-22/23	-10	34	24	41
1/9-20/23	-5	29	24	46
11/15-22/22	-9	32	23	45
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: When it comes to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, do you think the United States is providing too much support to Ukraine, not enough support to Ukraine, or about the right amount of support to Ukraine?

Americans view Ukraine more favorably, 60%, than unfavorably, 27%, a slight improvement since last asked in March, when 59% were favorable and 31% were unfavorable.

Views of Russia are much more negative, with 7% favorable and 82% unfavorable. In March, 9% were favorable and 83% were unfavorable.

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is seen favorably by 43% and unfavorably by 36%, with 21% who say they haven’t heard enough about him. In March, 45% were favorable, 39% were unfavorable, and 17% hadn’t heard enough.

Russian President Vladimir Putin is viewed favorably by 6% and unfavorably by 87%, with 7% who haven’t heard enough. In March, 7% saw him favorably, 85% unfavorably, and 8% hadn’t heard enough.

The war between Israel and Hamas has received among respondents an amount of attention similar to the Russia-Ukraine war, with 52% who say they have heard a lot about it, 37% saying they have heard a little, and 11% saying they have heard nothing at all.

Increased aid to Israel is supported by 23%, while 42% say Israel is receiving too much aid and 34% say it is getting about the right amount of aid. Opinion about the level of aid to Israel has remained relatively stable since February 2024, as shown in Table 20.

Table 20: Aid to Israel

Among adults

Poll dates	Aid
	Net not enough-too much	Too much support	Not enough support	About the right amount of support
9/15-24/25	-19	42	23	34
12/2-11/24	-16	40	24	36
5/6-15/24	-17	41	24	35
3/18-28/24	-13	37	24	39
2/5-15/24	-21	42	21	38
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: When it comes to Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza, do you think the United States is providing too much support to Israel, not enough support to Israel, or about the right amount of support to Israel?

Israel is viewed favorably by 36% and unfavorably by 49%, with 15% saying they haven’t heard enough. This is a decrease from March, when 43% were favorable, 43% unfavorable, and 14% lacked an opinion. Views of Israel vary with age: among those 18-29, 20% hold a favorable opinion and 59% an unfavorable opinion, while those 60 and older are 49% favorable and 41% unfavorable.

The Palestinians are seen favorably by 32% and unfavorably by 50%, with 18% who say they haven’t heard enough. This question was not asked previously. The Palestinians are viewed more favorably by those 18-29, 44% favorable and 34% unfavorable, than they are by those 60 and older, who are 24% favorable and 62% unfavorable.

More than half, 56%, say it is better for the U.S. to take an active part in world affairs, while 44% say it is better to stay out of world affairs. The trend on this question since 2022 is shown in Table 21.

Table 21: U.S. role in world

Among adults

Poll dates	U.S. role
	Net active role-stay out	Take an active part in world affairs	Stay out of world affairs
9/15-24/25	12	56	44
3/17-27/25	28	64	36
1/27-2/6/25	22	61	39
12/2-11/24	20	60	40
10/1-10/24	8	54	46
5/6-15/24	8	54	46
3/18-28/24	12	56	44
2/5-15/24	8	54	46
11/2-7/23	4	52	48
9/18-25/23	16	58	42
7/7-12/23	6	53	47
5/8-18/23	10	55	45
3/13-22/23	10	55	45
1/9-20/23	18	59	41
11/15-22/22	20	60	40
Marquette Law School Poll, national surveys, latest: Sept. 15-24, 2025
Question: Do you think it will be better for the future of the country if we take an active part in world affairs, or if we stay out of world affairs?

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted Sept. 15-24, 2025, interviewing 1,043 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-3.3 percentage points.

Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. Certain other data from this survey (focusing on those about public views of the Supreme Court) are held for release on Oct. 2. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available on the Marquette Law Poll website.