New Marquette Law School Wisconsin survey finds Barnes with 7-point lead over Johnson in U.S. Senate race, Evers ahead of Michels by 2 points in the race for governor, and Biden approval rating unchanged

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll survey of Wisconsin finds a close race for governor and Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes with a 7-percentage-point lead in the race for U.S. Senate.

In the governor’s race, 45% support Democratic incumbent Gov. Tony Evers and 43% favor Republican Tim Michels. The independent candidate, Joan Beglinger, is chosen by 7%, with 3% saying they don’t know and 2% who declined to answer. These responses include those who are undecided but who say they lean toward supporting a candidate. In June, 48% supported Evers and 41% favored Michels.

Table 1 shows the vote preference for governor among registered voters since June. Beglinger was not included in the June survey. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages; the precise wording of the questions can be found in the online link noted above.)

Table 1: Vote for Wisconsin governor among registered voters

Poll datesEversMichelsBeglingerOtherDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/2245437032
6/14-20/224841NA282

In the race for U.S. Senate, Democrat Mandela Barnes is supported by 51% and incumbent Republican Sen. Ron Johnson is the choice of 44%, while 1% say “neither,” 3% say they don’t know and 1% decline to answer. Vote preference includes those who say they are undecided but who say they lean toward a candidate. In the June poll, 46% preferred Barnes and 44% chose Johnson.

Table 2 shows the trend in support for the Senate candidates among registered voters since June.

Table 2: Vote for U.S. Senate among registered voters

Poll datesBarnesJohnsonNeitherDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/225144131
6/14-20/224644172

The survey was conducted Aug. 10-15, 2022, interviewing 811 Wisconsin registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.2 percentage points.

Partisan support for the candidates in the race for governor is shown in Table 3. Both Democratic and Republican voters are strongly unified behind their respective party’s candidates, with 91% of Democrats supporting Evers and 89% of Republicans supporting Michels. Forty-one percent of independents back Evers, while 37% prefer Michels. The independent candidate, Beglinger, receives 12% from independent voters and 4% from Republicans and 3% from Democrats.

Table 3: Vote for governor among registered voters, by party identification

(a) August

Party IDEversMichelsBeglingerOtherDon’t knowRefused
Republican6894010
Independent413712072
Democrat9143011

(b) June

Party IDEversMichelsOtherDon’t knowRefused
Republican586171
Independent49353112
Democrat952020

Partisan support for the U.S. Senate candidates is shown in Table 4. As in the governor’s race, partisans are well aligned with their party’s candidates, with 95% of Democrats supporting Barnes and 92% of Republicans supporting Johnson. Fifty-two percent of independents back Barnes, while 38% prefer Johnson.

Table 4: Vote for U.S. Senate among registered voters, by party identification

(a) August

Party IDBarnesJohnsonNeitherDon’t knowRefused
Republican792011
Independent5238252
Democrat954011

(b) June

Party IDBarnesJohnsonNeitherDon’t knowRefused
Republican689040
Independent41413133
Democrat952030

Among Republicans, 83% say they are absolutely certain to vote in November’s elections, as do 82% of Democrats and 66% of independents. Certainty of voting by party is shown in Table 5. Registered voters were asked, “Are you absolutely certain to vote, very likely to vote, are the chances 50-50, or don’t you think you will vote?”

Table 5: What are the chances that you will vote in the November 2022 general election for governor, Congress, and other offices?

(a) August

Party IDAbsolutely certainVery likely50-50Will not voteDon’t know
Republican8311420
Independent66161430
Democrat828550

The effect of the different levels of voter turnout on vote for governor is shown in Table 6. The first row shows preference among all registered voters, with the second row showing the results for an electorate composed of those either “absolutely certain” to vote or “very likely” to vote. The third row shows the results among only the most likely voters—those who say they are absolutely certain to vote.

Table 6: Vote for governor, by certainty of voting

How likely to voteEversMichelsBeglingerOtherDon’t know
All registered voters4543703
Certain or very likely to vote4644502
Only those certain to vote4844402

Table 7 shows the vote for U.S. Senate by certainty of voting.

Table 7: Vote for U.S. Senate, by certainty of voting

How likely to voteBarnesJohnsonNeitherDon’t know
All registered voters514413
Certain or very likely to vote524502
Only those certain to vote524501

Perceived candidate traits

Table 8 shows the perception of the trait that candidates “care about people like you.” Beglinger was not included in the traits battery of questions in this survey.

The relative lack of familiarity with the non-incumbent candidates, Michels and Barnes, is evident in the higher percentages that say they “don’t know” about them, compared to the two incumbents, Evers and Johnson.

Table 8: For each of the following candidates, would you say they are someone who cares about people like you, or don’t they care about people like you?

CandidateCaresDoesn’t careDon’t know
Evers54389
Michels383823
Barnes502723
Johnson414910

Table 9 shows the perception of the trait that candidates “share my values.” As with the previous table, the non-incumbents, Michels and Barnes, have higher rates of “don’t know” responses on these items.

Table 9: For each of the following candidates, would you say they are someone who shares your values or don’t they share your values?

CandidateShares valuesDoesn’t share valuesDon’t know
Evers50419
Michels383823
Barnes453124
Johnson405010

Table 10 shows the favorable and unfavorable ratings of the candidates since June, along with those who say they haven’t heard enough or don’t know. Beglinger was not included in this battery of items.

The non-incumbents have become substantially better known following their primary victories on Aug. 9, though they remain much less well known than the incumbents.

Table 10: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [INSERT NAME] or haven’t you heard enough about them yet?

(a) Evers

Poll datesFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/224641660
6/14-20/2244421120

(b) Michels

Poll datesFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/22333324100
6/14-20/2222225150

(c) Barnes

Poll datesFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/22372230110
6/14-20/2221165760

(d) Johnson

Poll datesFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/223847960
6/14-20/2237461420

Evers’ job approval

Table 11 shows approval of how Evers has handled his job as governor since February 2022. In a series of four polls beginning in February, Evers’ net approval has declined from +9 to +2 in August.

Table 11: Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Tony Evers is handling his job as Governor of Wisconsin?

Poll datesNet approvalApproveDisapproveDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/222474581
6/14-20/223484561
4/19-24/226494371
2/22-27/229504181

Importance of issues

In each survey by the Marquette Law School Poll since August 2021, respondents have been asked to rate how concerned they are with a variety of issues. Table 12 shows the concern with nine issues in the current survey, sorted from highest to lowest percentage saying they are “very concerned.”

Table 12: How concerned are you about each of the following? Are you very concerned, somewhat concerned, not too concerned, or not at all concerned with …

IssueVery concernedSomewhat concernedNot too concernedNot at all concerned
Inflation672740
Gun violence612665
Crime583092
Abortion policy552587
Public schools543473
Taxes4738123
Climate change41281317
Illegal immigration40281516
Coronavirus20352025

Inflation ranks as the top issue concern, but as Table 13 shows, there has been a decline in concern about this issue in August, following falling gasoline prices and a lower core rate of inflation from June to July according to the monthly consumer price index. There had been a steady rise in concern about inflation from August 2021 until June 2022.

Table 13: Concern about inflation, Aug. 2021-Aug. 2022

Poll datesVery concernedSomewhat concernedNot too concernedNot at all concerned
8/10-15/22672740
6/14-20/22752041
4/19-24/22692361
2/22-27/22682831
10/26-31/21642861
8/3-8/214935113

Partisans differ substantially in their concern over particular issues, as shown in Table 14. Panel (a) is sorted by Republican concern and panel (b) by concern among Democrats. The entries are the percentage of each partisan group who say they are “very concerned” about the issue.

 

Table 14: Issue concerns, percent ‘very concerned,’ by party identification

(a) Listed in order of concern among Republicans

IssueRepublicanIndependentDemocrat
Inflation916742
Crime804753
Taxes724426
Illegal immigration673419
Public schools605053
Gun violence455977
Abortion policy395373
Coronavirus91540
Climate change84079

(b)Listed in order of concern among Democrats

IssueRepublicanIndependentDemocrat
Climate change84079
Gun violence455977
Abortion policy395373
Public schools605053
Crime804753
Inflation916742
Coronavirus91540
Taxes724426
Illegal immigration673419

Abortion

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision which had meant that abortion was legal in all states. The public, both overall and in each partisan category, has heard a great deal about the June 2022 decision, as shown in Table 15.

 

Table 15: How much have you heard or read about a recent United States Supreme Court decision on abortion?, total and by party identification

Party IDA lotA littleNothing at allDon’t know
Total791730
Republican762220
Independent781651
Democrat861220

The decision to overturn Roe v. Wade is opposed by a majority of Wisconsin registered voters, including majorities of independents and Democrats, while it is favored by a majority of Republicans in the state, as shown in Table 16.

Table 16: Do you favor or oppose the recent Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe versus Wade, thus striking down the 1973 decision that made abortion legal in all 50 states?

Party IDFavorOpposeHaven’t heard of decisionDon’t KnowRefused
Total3360142
Republican6228082
Independent3162223
Democrat592021

Views of abortion policy have shifted by a few points, in favor of legal abortions, since the June 2022 Marquette Law School Poll, which was conducted before the Supreme Court’s abortion decision. Table 17 shows the change from June to August, overall and by party identification.

Table 17: Do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases, or illegal in all cases?

(a) Opinion in June and August

Poll datesLegal in all casesLegal in most casesIllegal in most casesIllegal in all casesDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/22303525531
6/14-20/222731241152

(b) Opinion by party identification, August

Party IDLegal in all casesLegal in most casesIllegal in most casesIllegal in all casesDon’t knowRefused
Republican924551021
Independent304018542
Democrat53415110

(c) Opinion by party identification, June

Party IDLegal in all casesLegal in most casesIllegal in most casesIllegal in all casesDon’t knowRefused
Republican821432061
Independent3030231052
Democrat45426530

The respondents to the August survey overwhelmingly support allowing legal abortions in the case of rape or incest, with 79% or more support in each partisan group, as shown in Table 18.

Table 18: Do you think Wisconsin should or should not allow a woman to obtain a legal abortion if she became pregnant as the result of rape or incest?

Party IDShould allowShould not allowDon’t KnowRefused
Total88841
Republican791642
Independent87652
Democrat97110

Jan. 6th and Opinion of Trump

More than half of respondents say they have heard a lot about the hearings of the House Select Committee on the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Table 19 shows how much respondents have heard, first among the total sample and then for each partisan group.

Table 19: How much have you heard or read about the hearings of the House Select Committee on Jan. 6th?

Party IDA lotA littleNothing at allDon’t know
Total5727151
Republican5332141
Independent5328190
Democrat7019111

Views of former President Donald Trump’s responsibility for violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, vary sharply by party identification, as shown in Table 20.

 

Table 20: How much responsibility, if any, should Donald Trump bear for the violence of some of his supporters in the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021?

Party IDA lotA littleNothing at allDon’t knowRefused
Total47193122
Republican8266232
Independent46222912
Democrat897220

Opinion on the accuracy of the results of the 2020 presidential election continues to sharply divide the public, with 66% saying they are very or somewhat confident and 32% saying they are not too confident or not at all confident in the election result. These views overall and by party identification are shown in Table 21.

Table 21: How confident are you that, here in Wisconsin, the votes for president were accurately cast and counted in the 2020 election?

Party IDVery confidentSomewhat confidentNot too confidentNot at all confidentDon’t knowRefused
Total4818151721
Republican1324253710
Independent4621151331
Democrat9053020

Among all registered voters, 38% have a favorable opinion of Trump, 57% have an unfavorable opinion of him and 5% lack an opinion or declined to answer. These views have barely changed during 2022, as shown in Table 22.

Table 22: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Donald Trump or haven’t you heard enough about him yet?

Poll datesFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/223857140
6/14-20/223956320
4/19-24/223658231
2/22-27/223657232

Table 23 shows opinion of Trump overall and by party identification in the August survey. A substantial majority of Republicans hold a favorable view of Trump, while majorities of independents and Democrats have an unfavorable opinion of him.

 

Table 23: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Donald Trump or haven’t you heard enough about him yet? August 2022

Party IDFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
Total3857140
Republican7715251
Independent3462040
Democrat395011

A majority of Wisconsin Republicans would like Trump to run for president in 2024, while a majority of independents and Democrats, and an overall majority, prefer that he not seek the presidency, as shown in Table 24.

Table 24: Would you like to see Donald Trump run for president in 2024, or not?

Party IDYesNoDon’t knowRefused
Total296551
Republican593371
Independent266662
Democrat39700

The entire survey period, which began on Aug. 10, 2022, ran after the FBI executed a search warrant at Trump’s property in Mar-a-Lago, in Florida, on Aug. 8, although the survey had already been finalized and so did not specifically inquire about the development.

Other issues

Support for a requirement of paid parental leave for new parents is strong overall, with 78% in favor of requiring businesses to offer paid leave and 17% opposed. Table 25 shows that majorities of each party favor such a proposal.

Table 25: Do you favor or oppose a proposal that would require businesses to provide paid family leave for mothers and fathers of new babies?

Party IDFavorOpposeDon’t KnowRefused
Total781751
Republican652843
Independent791560
Democrat90640

A majority, 69%, favor legalization of marijuana, while 23% are opposed. Table 26 shows opinion overall and by party.

 

Table 26: Do you think the use of marijuana should be made legal, or not?

Party IDYes, legalNo, illegalDon’t KnowRefused
Total692380
Republican5139100
Independent752040
Democrat811081

Forty-three percent of registered voters say it is more important to reduce property taxes, while 52% say it is more important to increase spending on public schools. When last asked in April 2022, 46% said reduce property taxes and 50% said increase spending on public schools. Table 27 shows the partisan divide on support for property tax cuts vs. spending on schools in the August survey.

Table 27: Which is more important to you: reduce property taxes or increase spending on public schools?

Party IDReducing property taxesIncreasing spending on public schoolsDon’t knowRefused
Total435250
Republican702361
Independent405450
Democrat168040

Expanding the number of students using publicly funded vouchers to attend private schools is favored by 46% and opposed by 45%. This is little changed from a year ago, in August 2021, when 45% favored and 45% were opposed. Table 28 shows how opinion on this issue differs by party identification in the current survey.

Table 28: Would you favor or oppose expanding the number of students using publicly funded vouchers to attend private schools?

Party IDFavor expanding vouchersOppose expanding vouchersDon’t know
Total46459
Republican57358
Independent51428
Democrat266213

Opinion on vouchers is sensitive to the wording of the question. In the April 2022 survey, the question was phrased as “Do you favor or oppose allowing all students statewide to use publicly funded vouchers to attend private or religious schools if they wish to do so?” With that wording in April, 58% favored extending vouchers to all students, and 33% were opposed.

Other trends

A majority of respondents, 56%, think the state is off on the wrong track, while 35% say it is headed in the right direction. The trend since February is shown in Table 29.

Table 29: Thinking just about the state of Wisconsin, do you feel things in Wisconsin are generally going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track?

Poll datesRight directionWrong trackDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/22355690
6/14-20/22375660
4/19-24/22365670
2/22-27/22395381

In August, 40% approve of the way President Joe Biden is handling his job, while 55% disapprove. In June, 40% approved and 57% disapproved. The trend in Biden approval in 2022 is shown in Table 30.

Table 30: Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the way Joe Biden is handling his job as president?

Poll datesApproveDisapproveDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/22405551
6/14-20/22405730
4/19-24/22435331
2/22-27/22435232

Sen. Tammy Baldwin is seen favorably by 39% and unfavorably by 37%. The trend in views of Baldwin is shown in Table 31.

Table 31: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Tammy Baldwin or haven’t you heard enough about her yet?

Poll datesFavorableUnfavorableHaven’t heard enoughDon’t knowRefused
8/10-15/2239371860
6/14-20/2239372031
4/19-24/2243361730
2/22-27/2242361831

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The Marquette Law School Poll is the most extensive statewide polling project in Wisconsin history. This poll interviewed 811 registered Wisconsin voters by landline or cell phone, Aug. 10-15, 2022. The margin of error is +/-4.2 percentage points for the full sample.

Some issue items were asked of half the sample. Those on Form A were asked of 409 and have a margin of error of +/-6 percentage points. Form B items were asked of 402 and have a margin of error of +/-6 percentage points.

Items asked of half-samples on Form A include concern about public schools, inflation, abortion policy, taxes, gun violence, and crime. Form B asked concern about the coronavirus pandemic, illegal immigration, and climate change. Form B also included items on legalization of marijuana, property taxes and school spending, and expansion of school vouchers.

The partisan makeup of the sample, including those who lean to a party, is 45% Republican, 44% Democratic, and 9% independent. The partisan makeup of the sample, excluding those who lean to a party, is 30% Republican, 29% Democratic, and 41% independent.

Since January 2020, the long-term partisan balance, including those who lean to a party, in the Marquette poll has been 45% Republican and 44 % Democratic, with 9% independent. Partisanship excluding those who lean has been 30% Republican and 28% Democratic, with 41% independent.

The entire questionnaire, methodology statement, full results and breakdowns by demographic groups are available at law.marquette.edu/poll/results-and-data.

New Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds little change in partisan divisions and motivations about voting following Supreme Court abortion decision; those favoring Roe’s overturning are more motivated to vote in November

MILWAUKEE – A new Marquette Law School Poll national survey finds little evidence that partisan motivation to vote in the 2022 elections has been altered by the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, which had established a right to an abortion. There has been much speculation that this June decision, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, would change the November outlook.

Yet a comparison of the Marquette Law School Poll’s May and July national survey data finds few elements of change in motivation to vote or in vote choice, despite a substantial drop in public approval of the Court’s handling of its job and a majority of the public opposed to the Court’s decision in Dobbs.

Approval of the Supreme Court’s job performance fell to 38% in July, down from 44% in May and 54% in March. In July, 36% favored the decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and 64% opposed that decision, among those with an opinion. (Those particular and certain other data about public views of the Court from this July survey were released yesterday, July 20, and can be found on the Marquette Law School Poll website; this release provides further results of the same survey on national topics.)

However, whether measured by enthusiasm about voting in November or the certainty of voting, there has been only a slight overall change in motivation among registered voters, as shown in Table 1. (All results in the tables are stated as percentages; the precise wording of the questions can be found in the online link noted above.)

Table 1: Enthusiasm about voting and certainty of voting, among registered voters, May-July 2022

(a) Enthusiasm about voting in November

Poll datesVery enthusiasticSomewhat enthusiasticNot too enthusiasticNot at all enthusiastic
5/9-19/224332196
7/5-12/224526227

(b) Certainty to vote in November

Poll datesAbsolutely certain to voteVery likely to voteChances are 50-50Don’t think will vote
5/9-19/226318162
7/5-12/226516127

The latest Marquette Law School Poll Supreme Court survey was conducted July 5-12, 2022, shortly after the last decisions of the October 2021 Supreme Court term were released. The survey interviewed 1,003 adults nationwide and has a margin of error of +/-4 percentage points. The sample includes 853 registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.3 percentage points.

The July results show that Republicans have slightly increased their advantage over Democrats in enthusiasm and projected turnout, compared to May, as shown in Table 2. In July, the percentage of Republicans very enthusiastic to vote rose 8 percentage points, while enthusiasm rose 3 percentage points among Democrats. Similarly, the percentage saying they are certain to vote in November rose 5 percentage points among Republicans but 2 percentage points among Democrats.

The enthusiasm gap between the parties is a substantial 18-percentage-point Republican advantage, while the certainty of voting shows a smaller 5-point Republican edge.

Table 2: Enthusiasm about voting and certainty of voting, by party identification, among registered voters, May-July 2022

(a) Enthusiasm about voting in November

Party IDPoll datesVery enthusiasticSomewhat enthusiasticNot too enthusiasticNot at all enthusiastic
Republican5/9-19/225531121
Republican7/5-12/226325102
Independent5/9-19/2234282612
Independent7/5-12/2233233311
Democrat5/9-19/224237192
Democrat7/5-12/224531177


(b) Certainty to vote in November

Party IDPoll datesAbsolutely certain to voteVery likely to voteChances are 50-50Don’t think will vote
Republican5/9-19/22721891
Republican7/5-12/22771193
Independent5/9-19/225120244
Independent7/5-12/2250211613
Democrat5/9-19/227015141
Democrat7/5-12/227214102

There is also little change in enthusiasm or certainty of voting based on whether the respondent favors or opposes the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, as shown in Table 3. Among either those in favor or those opposed to overturning Roe, there was no change between May and July in the percentage who are very enthusiastic about voting. There were a very small increase in certainty of voting for those in favor of overturning Roe and a slight decline in certainty to vote for those opposed to overturning Roe.

Leaving aside the change: By either measure, enthusiasm or certainty of voting, those who favor the decision to overturn Roe are more motivated to vote in the fall elections.

Table 3: Enthusiasm about voting and certainty of voting, by favor or oppose overturning Roe v. Wade, among registered voters, May-July 2022

(a) Enthusiasm about voting in November

Overturn RoePoll datesVery enthusiasticSomewhat enthusiasticNot too enthusiasticNot at all enthusiastic
Favor overturn Roe5/9-19/226028102
Favor overturn Roe7/5-12/226019183
Oppose overturn Roe5/9-19/224032225
Oppose overturn Roe7/5-12/224028239

(b) Certainty to vote in November

Overturn RoePoll datesAbsolutely certain to voteVery likely to voteChances are 50-50Don’t think will vote
Favor overturn Roe5/9-19/227414110
Favor overturn Roe7/5-12/22761364
Oppose overturn Roe5/9-19/226620112
Oppose overturn Roe7/5-12/226316138

Those saying abortion is one of the most important issues increased by only 3 percentage points from May to July, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4: Importance of the abortion issue, among registered voters, May-July 2022

Poll datesOne of the most important issuesSomewhat importantNot very importantNot important at all
5/9-19/224139155
7/5-12/224438135

There were similarly small changes by partisanship, as shown in Table 5. Democrats are much more likely to rate abortion as one of the most important issues than are Republicans and independents, but there has been little change in opinion on importance of the issue since May.

Table 5: Importance of the abortion issue, by party identification, among registered voters, May-July 2022

Party IDPoll datesOne of the most important issuesSomewhat importantNot very importantNot important at all
Republican5/9-19/223540169
Republican7/5-12/223741176
Independent5/9-19/223839184
Independent7/5-12/224038165
Democrat5/9-19/22503992
Democrat7/5-12/22543583

A bare majority, statistically rounded to 50%, say they would vote for a candidate who favors keeping abortion legal, while 33% would vote for a candidate who favors strictly limiting abortion and 17% say the abortion issue would not matter to them. Table 6 shows little change in vote choice based on the abortion issue from May to July.

Table 6: Vote based on candidate abortion position, among registered voters, May-July 2022

Poll datesThe candidate who favors keeping abortion legalThe candidate who favors strictly limiting abortionThe abortion issue would not matter to me
5/9-19/22543214
7/5-12/22503317

Table 7 shows that vote preference has remained divided but stable, among partisan groups, while independents have become somewhat less supportive of candidates who support abortion rights, from May to July.

Table 7: Vote based on candidate abortion position, by party identification, among registered voters, May-July 2022

Party IDPoll datesThe candidate who favors keeping abortion legalThe candidate who favors strictly limiting abortionThe abortion issue would not matter to me
Republican5/9-19/22206119
Republican7/5-12/22186221
Independent5/9-19/22592615
Independent7/5-12/22443521
Democrat5/9-19/2283115
Democrat7/5-12/228488

Preferences on abortion policy

Asked their preference for policy on abortion, 28% say abortion should be legal in all cases, 36% say legal in most cases, 27% say it should be illegal in most cases, and 8% say illegal in all cases. Here and in subsequent tables, the results are for all adults, rather than for only registered voters as above in discussing motivation to vote and vote choice.

Those who say abortion should be legal in all cases or who say it should be illegal in all cases are the most likely to say it is one of the most important issues to them, while those saying legal in most or illegal in most cases are both half as likely (as the “all” groups) to say it is one of the most important issues. The relationship between policy preference and importance of the issue is shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Importance of abortion issue, by policy preference on abortion, among adults, July 2022

Policy on abortionOne of the most important issuesSomewhat importantNot very importantNot important at all
Legal in all cases633043
Legal in most cases3146175
Illegal in most cases3044187
Illegal in all cases642733

There has been little change in preference for abortion policy by party identification since Roe was overturned on June 24. Table 9 shows policy preference, by partisan groups, in May and July. A majority of Republicans say it should be illegal in all or most cases, while majorities of independents and Democrats say it should be legal in all or most cases, with an especially large majority among Democrats. Support for legal abortion declined by 10 percentage points among independents from May to July.

Table 9: Policy preference on abortion, by party identification, among adults, May-July 2022

Party IDPoll datesLegal in all casesLegal in most casesIllegal in most casesIllegal in all cases
Republican5/9-19/2212274615
Republican7/5-12/2211234718
Independent5/9-19/223042207
Independent7/5-12/222438307
Democrat5/9-19/22454294
Democrat7/5-12/22484471

Policy preferences are sensitive to the specific limitations proposed on abortion. Several state legislatures have enacted or debated laws that would ban abortions (with some exceptions) at various stages of pregnancy. The survey asked a series of questions about support for or opposition to bans along the lines of these state proposals. Each question included an exception for “medical emergencies.”

The question asked:

Here are some limits on when during pregnancy an abortion might be banned, except in cases of medical emergencies, that some states are considering. How much do you favor or oppose each of these proposals?

The results for the five alternative policies presented are shown in Table 10. There is majority opposition to a ban at all times (“any time during pregnancy” in table) or a ban after 6 weeks, and an even divide on a ban after 15 weeks. A majority favor a ban after six months, and a majority oppose abortions being legal at all times (“No restrictions at any point” in table). None of the differences between May and July are statistically significant.

Table 10: Favor or oppose abortion bans, by when ban would take effect, among adults, May-July 2022

Ban whenPoll datesFavorOppose
Ban at any time during pregnancy5/9-19/222772
Ban at any time during pregnancy7/5-12/223069
Ban after 6 weeks5/9-19/223465
Ban after 6 weeks7/5-12/224059
Ban after 15 weeks5/9-19/225049
Ban after 15 weeks7/5-12/225346
Ban after 6 months5/9-19/226535
Ban after 6 months7/5-12/226633
No restrictions at any point5/9-19/223960
No restrictions at any point7/5-12/224158

Some states have considered legislation that would make it illegal for a woman to have an abortion by traveling to a different state where abortion is legal. This policy is favored by 21% of respondents and is opposed by 78%. There has been little change on this, as shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Should states be able to make out-of-state travel for abortion illegal, responses among adults, May-July 2022

Poll datesYesNo
5/9-19/222278
7/5-12/222178

Majorities of all partisan groups say states should not be able to restrict out-of-state travel to obtain abortions. There has been little change in opinion on this issue among partisan groups from May to July, as shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Should states be able to make out-of-state travel for abortion illegal, by party identification, among adults, May-July 2022

Party IDPoll datesYesNo
Republican5/9-19/223466
Republican7/5-12/223169
Independent5/9-19/221881
Independent7/5-12/222080
Democrat5/9-19/221585
Democrat7/5-12/221684

The potential for states to make it illegal to get and fill prescriptions from out-of-state providers for medication that induces an abortion is favored by 26% and opposed by 73%. This question was not asked previously.

As with out-of-state travel for abortions, this possible legal restriction shows a sharp divide by party, as seen in Table 13, though a majority of each partisan group oppose such restrictions.

Table 13: Should a state be able to make it illegal for a woman to get and fill a prescription from out-of-state providers for medication that will induce an abortion, by party identification, among adults, July 2022

Party IDYesNo
Republican4158
Independent2773
Democrat1387

January 6 Committee hearings

Among adults, 43% say they have heard a lot about the January 6 Committee hearings, 38% have heard a little, and 19% have heard nothing at all. For comparison, 81% have heard a lot about the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, and 47% have heard a lot about the Court’s ruling that the Second Amendment includes the right to possess a firearm outside the home.

Table 14 shows that Democrats have been more attentive to the January 6 Committee hearings than have Republicans or independents, though a large majority of each group has heard at least “a little.”

Table 14: Heard about January 6 Committee hearings, by party identification, among adults, July 2022

Party IDA lotA littleNothing at all
Republican354817
Independent373825
Democrat563212

Fifty-two percent say that former President Donald Trump bears “a lot” of responsibility for the violence on January 6, while 18% say “a little” and 30% say he has no responsibility at all for the violence. Those who have heard a lot about the January 6 Committee hearings say Trump is more responsible than do those who have heard little or nothing about the hearings, as shown in Table 15.

Table 15: Trump responsibility for January 6 violence, by amount heard about the January 6 Committee hearings, among adults, July 2022

Heard about Jan. 6 CommitteeA lot of responsibilityA little responsibilityNone at all
A lot68922
A little or none402535

While partisans differ in their attention to the hearings, and in their views of Trump, those who have heard a lot about the hearings assign greater responsibility for violence to Trump than do those who have heard less, though the partisan gap remains very large, as shown in Table 16.

Table 16: Trump responsibility for January 6 violence, by amount heard about the January 6 Committee hearings and by party identification, among adults, July 2022

Party IDHeard about Jan. 6 CommitteeA lot of responsibilityA little responsibilityNone at all
RepublicanA lot172657
RepublicanA little or none62668
IndependentA lot66727
IndependentA little or none393230
DemocratA lot9530
DemocratA little or none811010

The public is evenly divided on the evidence presented by the January 6 Committee, with 52% saying it has been convincing and 48% saying it has not been convincing. Partisan differences are quite large in this case, as shown in Table 17.

Table 17: Has evidence presented in January 6 Committee hearings been convincing, by party identification, among adults, July 2022

Party IDHas been convincingHas not been convincing
Republican1585
Independent4950
Democrat8316

As with views of Trump’s responsibility, those who have heard a lot about the hearings are more likely to say the evidence is convincing, in every partisan group, though the partisan differences remain large, as shown in Table 18.

Table 18: Has evidence presented in January 6 Committee hearings been convincing, by party identification and by how much heard about hearings, among adults, July 2022

Party IDHeard about Jan. 6 CommitteeHas been convincingHas not been convincing
RepublicanA lot2179
RepublicanA little or none1288
IndependentA lot6535
IndependentA little or none4060
DemocratA lot954
DemocratA little or none6832

There has been little net change in favorability ratings of Trump since the hearings began. In July, 34% had a favorable view of Trump, compared to 35% who were favorable in May. There is little difference in favorability among partisans based on how much they have heard of the hearings, though independents who have heard a lot are somewhat less favorable to Trump as shown in Table 19.

Table 19: Favorable or unfavorable opinions of Donald Trump, by party identification and by how much heard about January 6 Committee hearings, among adults, July 2022

Party IDHeard about Jan. 6 CommitteeFavorable opinionUnfavorable opinionHaven’t heard enough
RepublicanA lot80201
RepublicanA little or none81154
IndependentA lot23761
IndependentA little or none31609
DemocratA lot3951
DemocratA little or none9882

Thirty-four percent in July say they would like Trump to run again for president, little changed from 33% in May.

Biden job approval

Approval of how President Joe Biden is handling his job as president has declined in July to 36%, down from 42% in May. This is the lowest approval for Biden in the Marquette Law School Poll national surveys. The full trend of Biden approval is shown in Table 20.

Table 20: Approval of Biden job performance, among adults, July 2021-July 2022

Poll datesApproveDisapprove
7/16-26/215842
9/7-16/214852
11/1-10/214951
1/10-21/224653
3/14-24/224455
5/9-19/224257
7/5-12/223664

Biden has seen approval ratings decline among Democrats and especially among independents, while Republicans have maintained high levels of disapproval.

Table 21: Approval of Biden job performance, by party identification, among adults, July 2021-July 2022

Party IDPoll datesApproveDisapprove
Republican7/16-26/211684
Republican9/7-16/21990
Republican11/1-10/211782
Republican1/10-21/22991
Republican3/14-24/22892
Republican5/9-19/22792
Republican7/5-12/22396
Independent7/16-26/215743
Independent9/7-16/214357
Independent11/1-10/214357
Independent1/10-21/224257
Independent3/14-24/223763
Independent5/9-19/224059
Independent7/5-12/222574
Democrat7/16-26/21963
Democrat9/7-16/218911
Democrat11/1-10/218316
Democrat1/10-21/228317
Democrat3/14-24/228613
Democrat5/9-19/227821
Democrat7/5-12/227525

Biden’s approval rating has also declined among white, Black, and Hispanic respondents, as shown in Table 22. The table demonstrates a steady decline among white and Black respondents since July 2021. Among Hispanic respondents, approval remained relatively stable until this survey, dropping sharply in July 2022, to 37%.

Table 22: Approval of Biden job performance, by race and Hispanic origin, among adults, July 2021-July 2022

Race and Hispanic originPoll datesApproveDisapprove
White7/16-26/215050
White9/7-16/214060
White11/1-10/214158
White1/10-21/224060
White3/14-24/224060
White5/9-19/223465
White7/5-12/223168
Black7/16-26/218810
Black9/7-16/217426
Black11/1-10/216832
Black1/10-21/225741
Black3/14-24/225643
Black5/9-19/225941
Black7/5-12/225149
Hispanic7/16-26/215644
Hispanic9/7-16/215446
Hispanic11/1-10/215149
Hispanic1/10-21/225643
Hispanic3/14-24/225148
Hispanic5/9-19/225641
Hispanic7/5-12/223763

About the Marquette Law School Poll

The survey was conducted July 5-12, 2022, interviewing 1,003 adults nationwide, with a margin of error of +/-4 percentage points. Interviews were conducted using the SSRS Opinion Panel, a national probability sample with interviews conducted online. The detailed methodology statement, survey instrument, topline results, and crosstabs for this release are available at https://law.marquette.edu/poll/category/results-and-data/.