Teaching, Technology, and Eckstein Hall

There is convergence of ideas about teaching and technology around the Law School lately. The Law School is holding idea sessions as part of our strategic planning process.  A significant part of the discussion involves teaching: effectiveness, learners, full and part-time education.  Earlier this week Douglas Fisher published an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education on “flipping” his database course at Vanderbilt. Flipping a course refers to taking the in-class lecture component and moving it to an online component, usually accomplished by recording the lecture. Earlier this summer I attended a presentation by Professor Norman Garland (Southwestern School of Law) who flipped his Evidence course and reported on the process and results. These threads all come together this week for me.

We haven’t flipped any classes here but we have blended (a term Garland prefers to flipping) a few. Some MULS faculty have been long time adopters of technology both in the classroom and outside. Many have electronic course pages, electronic supplements, electronic casebooks, and even video webcasts of course supplements. Several faculty here have blended some of their traditional in-class instruction with required out-of-class viewing of lectures. The MULS faculty who have blended their classes use the out-of-class lecture to establish the basics of the topic, which means in-class instruction can focus less on establishing the topic and more about exploring its nuances and its applications.

Continue ReadingTeaching, Technology, and Eckstein Hall

Marquette Moot Court Team Success at the NMCC

I had the privilege of working with two outstanding National Moot Court Competition (NMCC) teams again this year. The Region VIII round of the NMCC was hosted by Marquette this weekend.

Please congratulate team members Joseph Birdsall, Nicole Cameli, and Patrick Ritter, who advanced to the semifinal round of competition (top four teams out of 18). The team additionally received the second highest brief score at the competition. Attorneys Emily Lonergan and Jason Luczak coached the team.

Please also congratulate team members Steven Miracle, Megan Mooney, and Ariane Strombom for their performance at the competition. The team advanced to the quarterfinals (top eight teams). Attorneys Jesse Blocher and Michael Cerjak coached the team.

The NMCC is sponsored by the New York City Bar and the American College of Trial Lawyers. Over 150 law schools compete across the country.

I am grateful for our teams’ hard work; they put in many hours of practice to prepare for the competition. I am also grateful for the time donated by the Marquette Moot Court Association and many judges and lawyers who judged the briefs and oral arguments for our NMCC regionals. Finally, thank you to the individuals who judged the teams’ numerous practice rounds.

Continue ReadingMarquette Moot Court Team Success at the NMCC

Marquette Moot Court Team Success at National Criminal Procedure Tournament

Our two moot court teams distinguished themselves at the National Criminal Procedure Tournament this weekend in San Diego. Sarah McNutt was the third place best oralist, and Matthew Hanson was the fourth place best oralist. The team consisting of Kristina Gordon and Sarah McNutt advanced to the top 16. Please congratulate team members Kristina Gordon and Sarah McNutt, advised by Professor Thomas Hammer and coached by Attorney Jennifer Severino, and Matthew Hanson and Erika Motsch, advised by Professor Susan Bay and coached by Attorneys Nick Cerwin and Chad Wozniak. Attorney Severino traveled with the teams. The competition this year included 36 teams.

Continue ReadingMarquette Moot Court Team Success at National Criminal Procedure Tournament