Voter Turnout Bucked the National Trend in Wisconsin

Voter turnout in Wisconsin this year was very high—among the highest ever in presidential elections in Wisconsin. Unofficial returns show 3,422,802 votes cast for president, up from 3,298,041 in 2020.[i]

About 125,000 more people voted in 2024 than 2020. Meanwhile, the state’s over-18 population grew by an estimated 56,000 between 2020 and 2023.[ii]

We won’t know the 2024 population estimate until sometime next month. If the over-18 population increase is fewer than 69,000, that will indicate that the share of adults voting in 2024 exceeded 2020, which was already an exceptional year.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission calculates that 72.9% of adults voted in 2020, which is the third highest rate since their data begins in 1948. In 1966, they estimate 72.0% voted and in 2004, 73.2%.[iii] Depending on the 2024 adult population estimate, the 2024 election will likely join this group of extremely high turnout elections where just shy of 3-in-4 adults participated.

Keep in mind that turnout as a share of the voting eligible population is even higher. Here are some estimates from the University of Florida Election Lab.

In 2024, the Election Lab estimates that 76.4% of eligible voters in Wisconsin cast a ballot, compared to 63.5% nationally. In 2020 it was probably 75.0% in Wisconsin, compared to 66.4% nationally. Turnout in Wisconsin is usually higher than US average, but this year the gap grew especially large. In 2020, turnout was 8.6 points higher in Wisconsin, growing to 12.9 points higher in 2024.

The true voter turnout rate can only be estimated because the denominator (actually eligible citizens) is unknown. At least in a month or two, we’ll have more recent data for the state adult population, from which we can further refine these estimates of the eligible share.

Estimates for the adult population of counties and municipalities will become available later in 2025. The kind of granular data needed to estimate ward-level adult population turnout rates won’t be available until the 2030 census.

The absence of high-quality data will not prevent the creation of turnout statistics, nor should they, necessarily. We cannot wait for the 2030 census to begin figuring out which voters were inspired by the last campaign and which weren’t. My point in elaborating these difficulties is to warn you that the first turnout statistics you see will not be the final word on the matter.

If you would like to receive John’s Faculty Blog posts in your email inbox, subscribe here.

Here is what the limited data we do have can tell us about voter turnout around Wisconsin.

  • The number of votes cast for president increased in 71 of 72 counties. Only tiny Menominee was the exception (18 fewer votes cast).
  • The number of votes cast grew by more than the 2020-2023 increase in the adult population in 65 of 72 counties. The 7 counties where vote change lagged adult population growth are Bayfield, Vilas, Forest, Ozaukee, Menominee, Ashland, and Burnett.
  • In Milwaukee County, the number of votes cast grew by 4,346, despite the adult population falling by about 11,900 between 2020 and 2023.
  • In Dane County, the number of votes cast grew by 21,153, compared with an adult population increase of about 15,600 between 2020 and 2023.
  • In Waukesha County, the number of votes cast grew by 7,756, while the adult population grew by an estimated 6,900 between 2020 and 2023.

The Census Bureau’s Population Estimate Program doesn’t provide adult population estimates for individual municipalities, so we’re stuck with total population estimates.

  • In the City of Milwaukee, the number of votes cast grew by 560 votes, while the total population fell by about 15,800 between 2020 and 2023.
  • In the City of Madison, the number of votes cast grew by 11,740, while the total population grew by an estimated 5,100 between 2020 and 2023.

It is not the case that turnout fell in Democratic-leaning communities and increased in Republican ones. There is no correlation between a county’s change in turnout and the share of the vote received by Donald Trump. There may be a slight correlation between the increase in turnout and the increase in Trump’s share of the vote relative to 2020.

High turnout helped Trump because a group of infrequent voters showed up and disproportionately supported him. These “low propensity” voters were spread evenly across the state, contributing to Wisconsin’s small but remarkably uniform 1.5-point swing toward Trump.

Note: This post was updated to include a new analysis of the correlation between turnout and partisan vote share.


[i] The number of votes cast for president is slightly lower than the total number of ballots cast, which I have not collected. In 2020, 10,764 voters turned in a ballot but declined to vote in the presidential contest.

[ii] These numbers are from the Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program and are estimated for July 1st of each respective year. The estimates for July 1, 2024 will be released in December.

[iii] The WEC numbers use total ballots cast as their denominator (not presidential votes), and they use a slightly different estimate of the over-18 population. Their estimate comes from the Wisconsin Department of Administration which uses a somewhat different methodology and calculates their annual estimates for a different date than the federal Population Estimates Program.

Continue ReadingVoter Turnout Bucked the National Trend in Wisconsin

Presidential Vote Change and Senate vs. Presidential Vote

Two sets of maps tell part of the story of the 2024 election.

First is how the changes from 2020 to 2024, and from 2016 to 2020 were modest in size compared to the massive shifts from 2012 to 2016. The 2016 election reset the playing field. Since then voters shifted slightly to President Joe Biden in 2020 and now slightly to Former President Donald Trump in 2024. In 2012 President Barack Obama won the state by 6.9 points, then Trump won in 2016 by 0.8, a shift of 7.7 points on the margin. But in 2020, Biden won by 0.6 points, a shift of 1.4 points. Now in 2024 Trump has won by 0.9 points, a shift of 1.5 points. These shifts, small as they are, have flipped the state in two successive elections, but the magnitude of the vote shifts pale in comparison to the prior change from 2012 to 2016.

The maps show change between successive elections in each ward in the state. This is the change in the margin of the 2-party vote in each year. The ward level data is the product of the Marquette Law School Lubar Center’s election night data collection project led by Lubar Fellow John Johnson. (As of this post 2 counties have not yet posted ward level returns for 2024. They are shaded on the maps by the county-wide votes.)

The second pair of maps show the vote margin in the U.S. Senate race, on the left, and the difference between the Senate margin and the presidential margin on the right. Incumbent Sen. Tammy Baldwin won by 0.9 percentage points, reversing the win by Trump by 0.9 points. This small 1.8 point difference delivered a rare split outcome in Wisconsin with different parties winning the presidential and Senate elections on the same day.

Baldwin’s margin was substantially due to large and heavily Democratic counties including Milwaukee and Dane. But had the Senate race merely matched the presidential vote Republican Eric Hove would have won. The map on the right shows that Baldwin did better in most parts of the state than did Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential contest. The Senate margin was more favorable to Baldwin in most of the state, including areas that favored Trump in the presidential race. Much had been written about Baldwin’s ability to “lose by less than other Democrats” in Republican leaning areas. In 2024 that was apparent.

Continue ReadingPresidential Vote Change and Senate vs. Presidential Vote

Wisconsin County Votes for President and Senate

Here is a simple guide to the county votes for president and Senate in Wisconsin on November 5, 2024.

Donald Trump won 59 Wisconsin counties while Kamala Harris won 13.

Where do the votes come from? The Democratic net vote comes with huge margins in Dane and Milwaukee counties, followed by much smaller margins in 11 other counties. The large Republican margins come from Waukesha and Washington. The many smaller Republican leaning counties collectively provide Republican strength, offsetting the fewer counties with Democratic majorities, despite the large margins in Dane and Milwaukee.

Harris improved over Biden’s 2020 vote percentage margin in only four counties, Washington, Ozaukee, Waukesha and Door. She did a bit worse than Biden in Eau Claire, Dane and (especially) La Crosse, usually Democratic strong holds.

County vote margin in the Senate

Baldwin won 14 counties, including Sauk which Trump won, while Hovde won 58.

Senate margin minus presidential margin

While Baldwin only narrowly out-performed Harris, winning by .9 percentage points while Harris lost by .9 percentage points, Baldwin outperformed the presidential ticket in all but four counties: Menominee, Ozaukee, Waukesha and Washington.

Continue ReadingWisconsin County Votes for President and Senate