Burglary, Violence, and the Armed Career Criminal Act

The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics has issued a new report on victimization during household burglary, which might have important implications for the application of the Armed Career Criminal Act.  First, here are the report’s highlights on the burglary-violence connection:

  • A household member is present in about one-quarter of residential burlgaries.
  • A household member is violently vicitmized in about seven percent of residential burglaries (or about one-quarter of the burglaries in which a household member is present).
  • In residential burglaries, simple asault is the most common violent crime (3.7 percent of all burlgaries), while more serious violent crimes like rape (0.6 percent) and aggravated assault (1.3 percent) are far less frequent.
  • In a majority of even the “violent” burglaries, the victim indicates there is no injury; a “serious injury” is sustained in only 8.5 percent of the violent burglaries.
  • In the violent burglaries, fewer than forty percent of the offenders are armed.

Now, for the ACCA link. 

Continue ReadingBurglary, Violence, and the Armed Career Criminal Act

Pickering Free Speech Rights and Cyberbullying by Public Employees

Cyberbully I can’t make this stuff up.  From CNN and Anderson Cooper (with video):

For nearly six months, Andrew Shirvell, an assistant attorney general for the state of Michigan, has waged an Internet campaign against college student Chris Armstrong, the openly gay student assembly president at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

Using the online moniker “Concerned Michigan Alumnus,” Shirvell launched his blog in late April.

“Welcome to ‘Chris Armstrong Watch,'” Shirvell wrote in his inaugural blog post.  

Continue ReadingPickering Free Speech Rights and Cyberbullying by Public Employees

Oprah v. Judge Judy

I was intrigued by last week’s rankings of the most popular daytime television shows in America.  For the first time in over a decade, “Oprah” had fallen from the top.  Perhaps the appeal of the long-time queen of daytime television is in decline.  What replaced Oprah’s smarmy, ingratiating patter?  My goodness, the most popular daytime television show is now “Judge Judy.”

The staying power and influence of “Judge Judy” are noteworthy, especially for those of us in the law.  The show premiered in 1996, and Judy’s aggressive pontificating has inspired literally a dozen copy-cat shows.  Large numbers of Americans love to watch the good Judge and her ilk, and in Milwaukee it is literally possible to watch daytime judge shows continuously from breakfast to dinner.  Dasha Slater, writing in “Legal Affairs,” has dubbed the most avid viewers of these shows not “couch potatoes” but rather “court potatoes.”

Is there cause for concern?  On the one hand “Judge Judy” and the other daytime judge shows are only fleeting entertainment, but on the other hand they project and endorse a particular variety of courtroom justice.  It is meted out without the help of counsel and refined procedural rules by authoritarian figures prone to intense and stinging moral condemnation.  Maybe we’d be better off if people turned back to “Oprah.”

Continue ReadingOprah v. Judge Judy