Seeing the Error of Their Ways

Chad Oldfather has a new article on SSRN entitled “Error Correction.”  Having analyzed various other aspects of the appellate process in earlier articles, Chad here turns to the most mundane function of the appellate court.  Where most scholarship on appellate process focuses on the lawmaking authority of appellate courts, few cases actually result in appellate courts breaking important new legal ground; more commonly, appellate review is simply a search for error based on established precedents.  But what exactly is “error”?  The question has received little scholarly attention to date, but Chad now remedies that neglect in his characteristically thoughtful fashion.  Here is the abstract of his article, which is forthcoming in the Indiana Law Journal

Continue ReadingSeeing the Error of Their Ways

U.S. News Rankings

According to versions of the 2010 U.S. News and World Report Law School rankings reported on various blogs this morning, Marquette’s overall ranking has risen from 95th to 87th among the 184 ABA accredited law schools.  Furthermore, its peer rating by law professors increased from 2.3 to 2.4 (out of a possible score of 5.0).  Although the reliance of the applicant pool on these rankings is much deplored within the legal academy, there is no doubt that it is better to be going up in the rankings rather than down.

The overall ranking of “tied for 87th” places Marquette in exactly the same spot in the rankings as its two Catholic peers to the South, DePaul and Loyola of Chicago. Also tied for spots 87 through 93 are Rutgers-Newark, IU-Indianapolis, South Carollina, and St. John’s.  For all practical purposes, Marquette remains squarely in the middle of the ratings.  Although the peer rating rose from 2.3 to 2.4 the median for peer ratings also rose from 2.3 to 2.4.

Continue ReadingU.S. News Rankings

New Issue of Marquette Law Review

I am delighted to report that the spring issue of the Marquette Law Review is now available on-line.  Here are the contents of volume 92, issue 3:

ESSAY

“IDEOLOGY IN” OR “CULTURAL COGNITION OF” JUDGING: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
Dan M. Kahan

ARTICLES

A MATTER OF TRUST: SHOULD NO-RELIANCE CLAUSES BAR CLAIMS FOR FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT OF CONTRACT?
Allen Blair

THE DILEMMA OF THE VENGEFUL CLIENT: A PRESCRIPTIVE FRAMEWORK FOR COOLING THE FLAMES OF ANGER
Robin Wellford Slocum

MAKING SENSE OF SCHAUMBURG: SEEKING COHERENCE IN FIRST AMENDMENT CHARITABLE SOLICITATION LAW
John D. Inazu

COMMENTS

WORKSITE RAIDS AND IMMIGRATION NORMS: A “STICKY” PROBLEM
Benjamin Crouse

SAME-SEX DIVORCE AND WISCONSIN COURTS: IMPERFECT HARMONY?
Louis Thorson

Continue ReadingNew Issue of Marquette Law Review