The Marquette team advanced to the octofinal round (top 16 teams) of the Evans A. Evans Constitutional Law Moot Court Competition hosted by the University of Wisconsin Law School. Please congratulate team members Elizabeth Bronson and Jay Fenton. Professor Idleman advised the team. The team practitioner coaches were Attorneys Alexandra Grimley, Megann Senfleben, Sheila Shadman, and Nicole Willette.
In honor of April Fools’ Day, the editors of the blog asked the faculty of the Law School to share their favorite examples of legal humor. Every day we will share a different faculty member’s submission. Today’s submission is from Professor Melissa Greipp.
The following are (supposedly) real statements made during court cases:
JUDGE: I know you, don’t I?
DEFENDANT: Uh, yes.
JUDGE: All right, tell me, how do I know you?
DEFENDANT: Judge, do I have to tell you?
JUDGE: Of course, you might be obstructing justice not to tell me.
DEFENDANT: Okay. I was your bookie.
—————————————————-
From a defendant representing himself ….
DEFENDANT: Did you get a good look at me when I allegedly stole your purse?
VICTIM: Yes, I saw you clearly. You are the one who stole my purse.
DEFENDANT: I should have shot you while I had the chance.
—————————————————-
JUDGE: The charge here is theft of frozen chickens. Are you the defendant?
DEFENDANT: No, sir, I’m the guy who stole the chickens.
In honor of April Fools’ Day, the editors of the blog asked the faculty of the Law School to share their favorite examples of legal humor. Every day we will share a different faculty member’s submission. Today’s submission is from Professor Bruce Boyden.
A new lawyer is trying his first criminal case, representing a man accused of biting another man’s ear off in a bar fight. Eager to show off his trial skills, he begins to cross-examine the prosecution’s first witness: the bartender on the night of the fight.
Q. You were tending bar that night, isn’t that correct?
A. Yes I was.
Q. And the bar was quite crowded that night, wasn’t it?
A. Yes.
Q. There were quite a lot of people standing in front of the bar, ordering drinks, isn’t that right?
A. Yes, that’s right.
Q. And the defendant was standing 10 to 20 feet away from the bar when the fight started, correct?
A. Yes he was.
Q. So there were several people between you and him?
A. Yes, there were.
Q. And you were quite busy serving drinks to those people, weren’t you?
A. Yes I was.
Q. So that you weren’t looking at the defendant when the fight started, were you?
A. No I wasn’t.
Q. And in fact, you couldn’t see the defendant when the fight started, could you?
A. No, I don’t think I could.
Q. Therefore, isn’t it true that you did not actually see the defendant bite the ear of the other man?
A. Yeah, that’s right. I didn’t see him bite the ear off.
Proud of his cross-examining prowess, the young lawyer smiled at the jury and asked one more question.
Q. So why did you testify that the defendant bit the man’s ear off?
A. Because I saw him spit it out a second later.