Marquette Students Win IP Writing Competition

Congratulations to Mitchell Stock and Francisco Quiroz, winners of the State Bar’s 2011 IP Writing Competition.  Stock won first place for his paper entitled “Hypothetical, Actual, or Footstar: How the Courts Should Handle Patent and Copyright Licenses in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.”  Quiroz took second for “The Decline of Fair Use: How the DMCA Marginalized Fair Use and What To Do About It.”  This adds to a recent tradition of strong showings by Marquette law students in the competition.

Continue ReadingMarquette Students Win IP Writing Competition

Barrock Lecture on Thursday

As described in greater detail here, Professor Robert Weisberg of Stanford Law School will be delivering our annual Barrock Lecture on Criminal Law at 12:15 on Thursday.  In anticipation of his visit, I’ve been reading a few of his recent law review articles.  Here are my reflections on these works:

Weisberg on Dan Kahan (our 2008 Boden Lecturer)

Weisberg on restorative justice

Weisberg on proposed reforms for the sentencing provisions of the Model Penal Code

Continue ReadingBarrock Lecture on Thursday

Appearing Before the Court

[Editor’s Note: This month faculty members share their favorite brief writing or oral argument tip. This is the first entry in the series.]

When people ask me about the most helpful tip I can give for writing a brief and appearing in front of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, my answer is always “preparation, preparation, preparation.” The most effective appellate lawyers have spent an incredible amount of time knowing and understanding their cases and the applicable and relevant law in the area. They have “mooted” their oral arguments a number of times in front of different lawyers or retired judges. Of course, appellate books and training programs tell you to do that as well.

I believe it is perhaps more helpful for me to write about a significant mistake I have seen very well prepared lawyers make. The biggest error by counsel appearing before the Court is to get too close to the case. They know how they want the case to turn out (although occasionally we had an attorney appear who could not exactly explain what he or she believed the mandate line should say if there is a reversal). We all understand that counsel’s objective (rightfully so) is to win it for the client.

Continue ReadingAppearing Before the Court