Celebrating Our Recent PILS Summer Fellows—and Looking Forward to 2025

Marquette University Law School and its surrounding communities are fortunate to have students dedicated to making a positive impact, as well as the strong support of those who help them in their efforts. As we look forward to a new group of Public Interest Law Society (PILS) fellows for this summer, we are sharing this week a series of reflections by Marquette law students on their experiences as Public Interest Law Society fellows during the past summer.

These reflections offer insight into how hands-on advocacy not only affects the communities served but also shapes the professional identities of future attorneys.

Public interest legal work requires working with people through challenging times. Our PILS fellows provide critical services to underserved populations and confront the challenge of justice—or injustice—in people’s lives.

This series of stories provides an opportunity to reflect on the formative power of this work.

We begin with Andrea Bishop (2L), who worked with Legal Action of Wisconsin’s Eviction Defense Project, providing legal representation to tenants facing housing instability. Her story reveals how critical access to representation is in addressing inequities in housing and creating stability for vulnerable individuals and communities.

By Andrea Bishop, 2L

Andrea BishopAt least twice a week this past summer, I worked with a tenant who, like dozens of others present in the Milwaukee County Courthouse, was moments away from losing their home—until we stepped in. This is the difference that adequate counsel can play in a person’s life.

I worked for and have continued to volunteer with Legal Action of Wisconsin’s Eviction Defense Project. Focusing on providing same-day limited scope legal representation to tenants facing eviction court, the Eviction Defense Project has been instrumental in changing the lives of hundreds of individuals.

Because civil defendants do not have a constitutional right to counsel, most Milwaukee tenants go unrepresented in eviction proceedings. The National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel reported that only 2% of Milwaukee tenants receive legal representation. But 76% of those represented successfully prevent eviction, according to the Stout report on Eviction Free MKE. Representation matters.

When tenants have access to counsel, they are given support that can make the difference in the ability to maintain jobs, schooling, and even health. In Milwaukee County, eviction court cases and judgments disproportionally affect individuals of color, exacerbating the already pressing issues of poverty and housing instability. Most Milwaukee landlords will outright deny rental applications from individuals with eviction cases on their records, even if the judgment has been paid in full or the case dismissed. Those that accept them tend to charge double or triple the security deposit to provide collateral to mitigate the risk of renting to tenants with prior evictions. These increased costs result in limited housing options for individuals suffering from financial difficulties, who are often left living in housing with severe conditions issues.

Many tenants at risk of eviction do not report unsafe conditions to Milwaukee’s Department of Neighborhood Services (DNS) for fear their housing will be deemed uninhabitable. This would force them to lose their housing, often without warning or preparation. Even when tenants do request inspections, DNS can refuse them and regularly does so when eviction proceedings are in motion.

Tenants who have had an eviction granted against them may lose housing benefits that are a critical component of their ability to maintain safe and secure housing. While tenants can reapply for benefits through the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee (HACM), it is a process which involves multiple forms and a lottery system. There is not enough availability of these sought after housing vouchers—HACM closed its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Public Housing waiting lists on August 1, 2024—and individuals who qualify have now missed their chance at affordable housing.

Milwaukee’s housing instability crisis requires all of us—lawmakers, landlords, and community members—to work together toward systemic change. The work of the Eviction Defense Project is just the beginning, and there is more to be done to ensure everyone has a safe and secure home. I am glad for the opportunity to contribute to this work.

Continue ReadingCelebrating Our Recent PILS Summer Fellows—and Looking Forward to 2025

2025 Jenkins Honors Moot Court Competition Participants Announced

Congratulations to the following 2025 Jenkins Honors Moot Court Competition participants: 

Isabella Barnard 
George Certalic 
Mikayla Collins 
Ananda Deacon 
Suzanne DeGuire 
Mallory Gault 
Reese Gee 
Isabella Gonzalez 
Elizabeth Hansen 
Mario Hernandez 
Dylan Hunn 
Michael Klein 
Sydney Kojis 
Jacob Leonard 
Ava Mares 
Hunter Phillips 
Andrew Pietroske 
Anna Pyle 
Connor Reed 
Anthony Sikorski 
Aaron Steines 
Rachel Sweet 
Peter Tabili 
William Welder 

Good luck, teams!  

Continue Reading2025 Jenkins Honors Moot Court Competition Participants Announced

Perceptions of Donald Trump a month into his second term

The stability of Donald Trump’s approval rating was practically a meme during his first administration. No matter the headlines, scarcely any voters appeared to change their minds about the president, at least not when asked the simple question, Do you approve or disapprove of how Donald Trump is handling his job as president?

It remains to be seen whether Trump in his second term will enjoy (or suffer) from the same apparently locked-in public attitudes. But to shed more light into what Americans really think about him, the Marquette Law School Poll has begun asking two open-ended questions. What do you [like/dislike] about Donald Trump? We randomize the order of the two questions, and respondents can write whatever they want.

Each survey, we ask about 1,000 adults these questions. All but two or three percent share a response.

In December, 35% expressed entirely negative views of Trump, 12% were entirely positive, and 51% were mixed, sharing both likes and dislikes (the remaining 2% refused to answer). This changed only slightly in early 2025. The group with mixed opinions shrank by 4 percentage points, and the other categories grew by 1 or 2 points each.

Summary of open-ended survey responses
in the Marquette Law School Poll, national adult sample
Attitude toward Donald Trumpsurvey dates
12/2-11/241/27-2/6/25
Can name likes and dislikes51%47%
Doesn’t dislike anything12%14%
Doesn’t like anything35%36%
no answer2%3%

Donald Trump won in 2024 because he beat Harris by about 38 points among voters holding mixed views of him. He enjoyed especially high support among those who hadn’t voted at all in 2020.

Most of these people still approve of how Trump has begun his second term. However, Trump’s approval rating has slipped with this group, relative to December 2024.

In December 2024, 53% of adults approved (and 47% disapproved) of how Trump had handled his job during his first term. About a month into Trump’s second term, 48% approve and 52% disapprove of how Trump is currently handling his job.

The drop in approval is entirely due to lower views of Trump’s current job performance among those with more ambivalent views of him.

Among those who only listed things they like about Trump, 96% approved of his past job performance in the December poll and 96% likewise approve of his current job performance in the February poll.

Conversely, 97% of those with only negative things to say about Trump disapproved of his past job performance in December and disapprove of his current job performance in February.

But among those with mixed views of Trump, 77% gave him retrospective approval in December, falling to 67% approval in February.

Themes in the open-ended responses

Some voters express idiosyncratic combinations of views when given the opportunity. You’ll find the occasional conservative whose only complaint about Trump is his support for Israel or the odd Harris voter who dislikes Trump’s “racist attitude” but appreciates that he “doesn’t drink or smoke dope.”

But most responses fall into familiar categories. Here are a few themes that stood out to me.

  • Outside of the 36% of adults who despise Trump, Trump’s hyper-aggressive first month in office is usually perceived favorably. Many people said things like, “he’s fulfilling campaign promises,” or “He has already done more in a few days than Biden did.”
  • A common complaint among those who generally like Trump is his communication style. Some representative comments: “he talks too much”; “the way he talks, very crude”; and “mean tweets, rehearsing [sic] his wins in election too often.”
  • On the other hand, even some people who disapprove of him like aspects of his communication. “Confidence, has charisma, is funny on occasion”; “He’s funny. He says what he thinks.”
  • Quite a few people complained about Trump’s pardoning of the January 6th rioters, and few or none mentioned it favorably.

Finally, these data also undermine a point I have occasionally heard from conservative commentators. Referencing the more “muted” response to Trump’s second term from Democratic politicians and left-leaning organizations, some have argued that opposition toward Trump’s first term was largely an elite, media creation.

On the contrary, in reading these open-ended responses I see no diminution of opposition to Trump. If anything, the vitriolic tone may have intensified among those who like nothing about him. This group is not a majority of the country. It includes under 40% of adults in our sample, but is is more than twice as large as the group of people with only positive things to say about Trump.

During Trump’s first term, his opponents turned out at unusually high levels–flipping seats during special elections and midterms at a startling clip. Democrats will look to repeat that playbook in 2025 and 2026. The surprise victory of a Democratic candidate in a Trump +21 Iowa state senate district is a small, early indication that this strategy may work.

Explore the data

The above is just my interpretation of these responses. I strongly encouraged you to read them for yourself. Click here to access our web app for viewing responses. The tool allows you to see 5 randomly* selected responses with each click of the button. Some of these responses contain profane language and many contain typos. We present them in unedited form.

screenshot of a table from the web application showing random responses to the open ended questions about Donald Trump
Continue ReadingPerceptions of Donald Trump a month into his second term