The Legacy of Giorgio Armani: Fashion Heritage between Intellectual Property Rights and Cultural Heritage Law

This is Part I of a two-part series. Part II is here.

On Sunday, September 28th, the last day of Milan Fashion Week, global celebrities, members of Milanese society and the Italian fashion industry, and throngs of everyday people, gathered in Milan’s Brera district outside of one of Italy’s most celebrated museums, the Pinacoteca di Brera. There to watch the Spring/Summer 2026 Giorgio Armani fashion show, the last presentation completely designed and imagined by the brand’s founder, Mr. Armani, before his unexpected death a few weeks earlier, the crowd and attendees could feel that they were part of a cultural moment. Indeed, the fashion show was not the only event dedicated to Mr. Armani in the museum. As models walked a runway in the museum’s courtyard, still other Armani fashion was exhibited within the museums’ galleries next to Renaissance paintings and later 19th century masterpieces, like Francesco Hayez’s The Kiss. Giorgio Armani. Milano, per amore, the first fashion exhibition within the museum’s galleries, allows Mr. Armani’s fashion to pervade the Pinacoteca, an autonomous Italian state museum under Italian law meant to preserve and valorize parts of our cultural heritage.  

An image of a model in Armani’s Spring/Summer 2026 fashion show

An image of a model in Armani’s Spring/Summer 2026 fashion show

An image of an Armani look in the museum’s galleries

An image of an Armani look in the museum’s galleries

Originally planned to celebrate the Armani brand’s 50th anniversary, the retrospective of Armani’s fashion in the Pinacoteca and the Spring/Summer 2026 Armani fashion show hosted by the brand in the museum’s courtyard have a new meaning after Mr. Armani’s death. Along with the decisions Mr. Armani made in his will, the brand’s fashion show and the museum exhibition offer examples for fashion designers eager to control their own fashion legacy in a space between intellectual property rights’ incentives to create and cultural heritage law’s preservation ethos.

In the first part of this post reflecting on what we can learn from Mr. Armani’s choices shortly before his death, I highlight how the Armani fashion show indicates how Mr. Armani controlled his fashion heritage alongside of and beyond the brand’s intellectual property rights in the fashion he created. In the second part of the post, I spotlight how Mr. Armani’s decision to display his fashion creations in the Pinacoteca and in other museum venues was part of a strategy to bypass Italian cultural heritage law’s protectionist ethos, offering the designer and his brand control over the cultural narrative surrounding Armani fashion for the future.

Giorgio Armani’s fashion continues to live on a frontier that is defined by business activities, cultural endeavors, and legal rights that defy the boundaries we traditionally identify with intellectual property law and cultural heritage law. Understanding how this frontier operates through the Armani case study is one way to imagine how fashion designers, and their eponymous brands, may decide to preserve and perpetuate their fashion and its cultural relevance in the future.

Continue ReadingThe Legacy of Giorgio Armani: Fashion Heritage between Intellectual Property Rights and Cultural Heritage Law

How News Sources and Social Media Usage Vary by Party

In our latest poll, we asked respondents to tell us how they learn about the news and which social media platforms they use. Those results are shown in the table below for the entire sample, as well as broken down by party ID.

Here are a few highlights:

  • Local TV news is still king. Just over half of adults watch it. The local TV audience leans just slightly Republican, but is overall politically mixed.
  • About half of adults get news from social media, evenly-balanced between Democrats and Republicans.
  • Fox News is the largest single network, by far. Just about one third of adults reported watching it, including half of Republicans, 24% of independents, and 14% of Democrats.
  • The traditional Big Three networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) and CNN all draw similar audience shares, 19% to 24% of adults. All of their audiences skew left, drawing 24% to 29% of Democrats versus 16% to 22% of Republicans.
  • Local newspapers drew 22% of adults, including 22% of Republicans, 13% of independents, and 26% of Democrats.
  • While local newspapers show only a small partisan gap in readership, Democrats are far more likely to read a national newspaper, listen to NPR, or watch PBS. Among Democrats, 28% used public radio/TV and 22% read a national newspaper. Among Republicans, 13% used public radio/TV and 10% read a national newspaper.
  • MSNBC draws only 11% of adults, including 17% of Democrats and 7% of Republicans.
  • Only 9% of adults said they got news from a podcast, but news podcasts were more popular with Republicans (13%) than Democrats (8%). Scarcely any Independents (2%) listened to a news podcast.
  • The two far-right competitors to Fox News, Newsmax and OAN, drew 11% and 3% of Republicans, respectively (compared to 50% for Fox).
  • The use of social media networks is far less politically polarized than news sources.
  • Nothing comes close to Facebook and Youtube in terms of social media usage. Over 70% of adults reported using them in the last week.
  • Facebook is a bit more popular with Republicans (78%) than Democrats (67%), but there is no significant partisan gap among Youtube users.
  • Instagram and TikTok are both more popular with Democrats and independents than Republicans. TikTok, in particular, draws strongly from independents.
  • Reddit and X (Twitter) are more evenly split between partisans. Reddit draws 3 percentage points more of Democrats than Republicans and X draws the reverse.

Elsewhere in the poll, we invited each respondent to write whatever they wanted in response to these three questions.

  1. What do you like about Donald Trump?
  2. What do you dislike about Donald Trump?
  3. What is your biggest concern about the country these days?

You can read the answers verbatim (in randomized order), along with each respondent’s news sources, social media habits, and basic demographic data using this web tool. The tool also allows you to filter for certain news or social media choices. For example, here’s a screenshot showing respondents who get their news from podcasts.

Continue ReadingHow News Sources and Social Media Usage Vary by Party

The Changing Federal and Wisconsin Law of Judicial Deference to Administrative Agencies

The matter of judicial deference to administrative agencies’ interpretations of law has seen notable developments both in Wisconsin and at the federal level in recent years. James B. Speta, the Elizabeth Froehling Horner professor at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law, recently participated in a panel on the topic at the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Annual Meeting and Convention and developed his remarks into this guest post appearing on the Marquette Law School Faculty Blog on October 1, 2025.

Very near the end of its term last year, on June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down one of its most significant administrative law decisions ever. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024) overruled one of the Court’s own precedents, which it had relied upon for 40 years in more than a hundred decisions and which had been cited in nearly 20,000 lower court decisions. Yet not only was Loper Bright not a great surprise in federal administrative law, but it was in many ways anticipated by a decision issued by the Wisconsin Supreme Court interpreting that state’s administrative law six years earlier, Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue (2018).

Continue ReadingThe Changing Federal and Wisconsin Law of Judicial Deference to Administrative Agencies