Rweru Reconciliation Village: A Symbol of Forgiveness and Healing in Post-Genocide Rwanda

This is the third in an occasional series of blog posts about a visit to Rwanda this past summer. The first and second can be found at the included links.

In the hills of Rwanda lies a small yet powerful symbol of hope and humanity—the Rweru Reconciliation Village. This unique community, located in the Bugesera district, is home to a blend of genocide survivors and perpetrators who have chosen to live side by side in the aftermath of one of the darkest chapters in modern history. The village exemplifies the power of forgiveness, the resilience of the human spirit, and the strength of Rwanda’s nationwide commitment to unity and reconciliation.

Born from Tragedy

In the years that followed the 1994 Rwandan Genocide against the Tutsi, Rwanda embarked on a remarkable journey of recovery. A key part of that journey was the country’s dedication to reconciliation and justice through local Gacaca courts (the subject of a future blog post), a traditional community-based legal system, which allowed perpetrators to confess, express remorse, and seek forgiveness. As this national process unfolded, the idea for reconciliation villages such as Rweru took root. They were designed as places where survivors and perpetrators could come together to rebuild trust, heal wounds, and forge a future based on forgiveness.

Living Testimonies: Stories of Survival and Forgiveness

During our first days in Rwanda, we visited the Kigali Genocide Memorial and the Nyamata Genocide Memorial—somber places filled with the weight of unspeakable loss and tragedy as portrayed in a prior blog post, Putting A Face to the Harm–Commemorating Lives. One afternoon, however, we entered a different reality as we visited the Rweru Reconciliation Village. For us, the emotional shift was palpable. We were immediately embraced by the warmth and vibrancy of a community that, despite its painful past, radiated hope, resilience, and the power of forgiveness. The contrast between the memorials and the village was profound, reminding us of both the depths of human suffering and ongoing trauma and the strength of the human spirit to heal and rebuild.

As we entered the village, a group of playful and curious children greeted us, embodying the hope that this place defines.

Children waiving

Shortly after, we were welcomed into a room filled with villagers, who greeted us with song and dance. The villagers’ performance was not just a welcome but a reflection of the collective spirit of reconciliation that thrives in Rweru—an experience that left a lasting imprint on all of us.

Gathering of the village

Within Rweru, the concept of reconciliation is not just theoretical—it is lived each day. The village houses both survivors who lost everything during the genocide and former perpetrators who have completed their sentences and sought forgiveness. Their stories are deeply moving and offer insight into the complexities of forgiveness.

One of the most powerful stories we heard was that of Maria Izagiriza, a survivor, and Philbert Ntezirizaza, a former perpetrator, who now live side by side. At their request, I share their story. Through an interpreter, Maria courageously shared her painful journey, offering a glimpse into her experiences and resilience. Maria’s husband and six of her nine children were brutally murdered during the genocide. Her emotional wounds were so deep she thought she could never heal. Her pain was compounded when she discovered that her neighbor, Philbert, had participated in the massacre that took her loved ones.

Philbert, who was imprisoned after the genocide, carried with him the burden of guilt. After serving his time, he returned to the community with a heart full of remorse. Like many others who had been part of the violence, he sought to make amends through Rwanda’s reconciliation process. Philbert knew that facing Maria would be one of the hardest things he had to do, but he also recognized it was essential for both of them to move forward.

When Philbert first approached Maria to ask for her forgiveness, the meeting was tense. Maria could barely contain her anger and sorrow. How could she forgive the man responsible for the deaths of her family? But over time, through multiple encounters facilitated by the village’s reconciliation programs, Maria saw the deep remorse in Philbert’s eyes. He shared how he had been consumed by violence and hatred but had come to understand the gravity of his actions. He asked for her forgiveness, not to absolve him of his guilt, but to help them both take a step toward healing.

It took years, but Maria, driven by her faith and a desire to free herself from the emotional chains of hatred, made the incredibly difficult decision to forgive Philbert. In doing so, she found a sense of peace she hadn’t felt since the genocide. Today, Maria and Philbert are not just neighbors but collaborators. They work together in the village fields, helping to grow food that sustains their community. Their story is a testament to the possibility of reconciliation, even between individuals whose lives have been torn apart by unimaginable violence.

The Importance of Forgiveness and Reconciliation

The process of reconciliation in Rwanda is not without challenges. For many, forgiveness is a slow and deeply personal journey, shaped by cultural and spiritual beliefs. But for those who live in Rweru and other reconciliation villages, forgiveness is seen not as condoning past atrocities, but to break free from the cycle of hatred.

The Rweru Reconciliation Village plays a critical role in Rwanda’s broader recovery. By housing both survivors and perpetrators in the same community, it creates a space for restorative practices to thrive and where healing can occur through daily interaction. The village is designed to foster dialogue, mutual understanding, and cooperation. Residents participate in joint activities, such as farming and building homes, which create opportunities for shared purpose and trust-building.

The impact of this model reaches far beyond the village. It shows the world that even in the face of unspeakable horrors, it is possible for communities to come together, forgive, and rebuild. Rwanda’s example of national reconciliation demonstrates the power of collective healing, and reconciliation villages like Rweru are a testament to the strength of that process.

During our visit, we also had the opportunity to engage in a powerful exchange of questions with the villagers. I asked them what they believed would have happened if forgiveness and reconciliation had not been embraced after the genocide. One villager’s response was profound and haunting: “We would have destroyed each other,” he said, explaining how anger and hatred could have consumed them entirely, leaving no chance for peace or survival. The choice to forgive, they emphasized, was not just for healing; it was a matter of survival for their community and the future of their children.

In turn, the villagers asked us a couple of question as well: “Why are Americans so divided when they have everything? Can Americans forgive?” These questions struck deeply, not because of their simplicity, but because of their complexity. In a country like Rwanda, where reconciliation had been necessary to rebuild after such devastating loss, their observation about division in a nation like the United States felt both insightful and challenging. These were not easy questions to answer, and they left us reflecting on our own capacity for forgiveness, unity, and what it truly means to heal from deep divides.

A National Model for Healing

The success of Rweru has inspired the creation of other reconciliation villages across Rwanda. These communities are part of a larger vision of unity championed by the Rwandan government and the National Unity and Reconciliation Commission. The goal is to foster peace and solidarity, not just among individuals, but across the entire nation. Rwanda has made it clear that its future will be built on a foundation of unity, not division.

While the scars of the genocide will never fully fade, the people of the Rweru Reconciliation Village are living proof that it is possible to move forward. Their lives are a testament to the transformative power of forgiveness, restorative justice, and the resilience of the human spirit. By choosing reconciliation over revenge, many in Rwanda have redefined the future of their community, setting an example for their country—and the world—that peace can arise even from the darkest of times.

Mary and an elder
Engaging with Rweru Village elder and genocide survivor

Continue ReadingRweru Reconciliation Village: A Symbol of Forgiveness and Healing in Post-Genocide Rwanda

How Donald Trump is Changing the Map in Milwaukee County

Small shifts from one election to another may be random and temporary, but consistent changes across three elections show something more enduring.

Across 29% of Milwaukee County, Trump in 2016 was more popular than Mitt Romney and he grew more popular still in each reelection campaign. In another 26% of the county he was less popular than Romney and continued to decline in each reelection campaign. Throughout the remainder of the county, his popularity has fluctuated—in most places dipping in 2020 and growing in 2024.

Subscribe to John’s newsletter to receive posts like this in your inbox.

maps showing the change in vote from one presidential election to the next

For this analysis, I compared the election results from each Milwaukee County suburb along with the 15 City of Milwaukee aldermanic districts (using 2024 boundaries).[i] Each aldermanic district is home to about 38,000 residents, making their population about the same as Oak Creek or Franklin.

Consider the following four regions.

line plot showing the change in vote since 2012 in different areas of Milwaukee County

Milwaukee Core

About 269,000 people live in the Milwaukee core region. This is the poorest area, with a per capita income of $22,000. Only 15% of adults over age 24 have a bachelor’s degree. About 14% of adults are white, 56% are black, and 23% Hispanic.

The voters in the Milwaukee core overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates—Kamala Harris won these 7 districts combined by 74 points. But Donald Trump has made significant inroads here. His 2024 performance was 12 points better than Mitt Romney’s in 2012.

Trump’s improvement here has been practically monotonic. Trump in 2016 was 3.9 points more popular than Romney in 2012. Trump in 2020 was 3.4 points more popular than Trump in 2016. And Trump in 2024 was 4.5 points more popular than Trump in 2020.

Northern Suburbs

The opposite political trend is occurring in Milwaukee’s northern suburbs (pop. 116,000). Across these communities the adult population is 78% white, 64% of those over 24 have a college degree, and the per capita income is $58,000.

Voters here have shifted sharply to the left in response to Trump. Romney lost the area by 13 points, Trump 2016 by 32 points, Trump 2020 by 42 points, and Trump 2024 by 45 points.

Southern Suburbs

Milwaukee County’s southern suburbs (pop. 246,000) are more working class than their northern counterpart. About 33% of adults over 24 have a college degree, and the per capita income is $41,000. The same share of population is white (78%) as in the northern suburbs, but more residents are Hispanic and fewer are Black.

The southern suburbs have long been the most conservative part of the county. Trump won them by 2.2 points in 2016, before losing them by 3.4 in 2020 and 2.9 in 2024.

Milwaukee Periphery

This leaves the collection of neighborhoods I’m calling the “Milwaukee periphery,” as they surround the Milwaukee core. These eight aldermanic districts hold 308,000 residents. The adult population is 57% white, 21% Black, and 14% Hispanic. The per capita income ($37,000) is slightly lower than in the southern suburbs, but the share of those ages 25 and up with a college degree (37%) is slightly higher.

Collectively, the Milwaukee Periphery gave Harris a 45-point victory, virtually identical to her margin of victory in the Northern Suburbs. However, the Trump-era political trajectory of the periphery has more closely resembled that of the southern suburbs.

Trump in 2016 declined by 2.8 points relative to Romney in 2012, and Trump in 2020 was 5 points less popular here than in 2016. Then, the trend reversed slightly, with Trump in 2024 improving by 1.2 points over his 2020 defeat.

Educational sorting

The results in Milwaukee are consistent with the national political realignment in the Trump era. If anything, Trump’s increase in support in Milwaukee’s urban core may trail the changes seen in some other cities.

Formal educational attainment remains one of the clearest predictors of a neighborhood’s changing levels of support for Donald Trump. About 32% of Wisconsin adults (ages 25 and older) have earned a bachelor’s degree (or more).

Since 2012, Democrats have gained the most in the parts of Milwaukee county where more than 50% have earned a bachelor’s degree. Democratic gains have been smaller in places where between 30% and 50% of adults have a college degree.

In places where college degree attainment trails the state average, Trump has usually made gains.

scatterplot comparing the shift in vote from 2012 to 2024 with the share of adults ages 25+ with a college degree

There are exceptions. Fewer than 20% of adults in the Village of West Milwaukee have a college degree, but Harris’ margin of victory was 10 points larger than Obama’s in 2012. This increase in Democratic support likely reflects changes to the racial composition of West Milwaukee, where the non-Hispanic white share of the population declined by about 15 percentage points over the past decade.

Keep this point in mind. Even though Black and Latino voters give Republicans more support than they once did, they still vote for Democrats at a higher rate than white voters overall. Consequently, an increase in the Black or Latino population of a community is still likely to increase its Democratic vote share.

Data Note:

See this repository for the data and graphics used in this article.

This table shows the trend in each Milwaukee County suburb and city aldermanic district in 2012 and 2024.

table showing how different places in Milwaukee County voted in the 2012 and 2024 presidential races

[i] Past elections were held under different ward boundaries, so I aggregated the Milwaukee city results into the current alder districts based on population overlap.

Continue ReadingHow Donald Trump is Changing the Map in Milwaukee County

Looking Back, Giving Thanks

Sensenbrenner Hall Thanksgiving truly is an extraordinary celebration. Its invitation to pause and take inventory of the people whom and events in our life that we are grateful for quietly renews one’s spirit.

This year stood out as I looked back and gave thanks because my reflection is colored by my impending retirement after more than 29 years at Marquette University. I continue to be filled with a deep sense of gratitude for the people I’ve met during nearly three decades of assisting benefactors—men and women who stepped forward to make a difference in the lives of others.

Among the countless memories that come to mind, I want to offer one recent experience as illustrative of the grace that is an integral part of the fabric of philanthropy. Earlier this fall we received a generous six-figure gift from Adrian P. Schoone, Class of 1959. Adrian was born and raised in rural Lincoln County, Wisconsin. Rising from humble roots, he was the first in his family to attend college let alone pursue professional training, and yet he excelled as a student, being selected editor-in-chief of the Marquette Law Review and finishing first in his class.

The purpose of his gift is to fund an endowed scholarship that each year will support part of the tuition of the editor-in-chief of the Marquette Law Review. The award will be a fitting capstone for a third-year law student following in the footsteps of this distinguished alumnus who forged a career as a noted trial lawyer but later set his personal interests on hold, dedicating a year to travel throughout Wisconsin in service as state bar president. The story of this one gift speaks to a higher, shared value that the Law School seeks to instill in each future Marquette lawyer entrusted to our care. It speaks to the restless pursuit of excellence—a seed that germinates while one is a student but first comes to fruition over the full course of time.

This gift in a sense encapsulates many of my own hopes and aspirations of the past twenty years since joining Dean Kearney to work in partnership with Associate Dean Wilczynski-Vogel to help advance the mission of the Law School. Having held other positions within University Advancement for a decade, I was recruited to team up with the dean and Christine and many others to assist in the comprehensive fundraising effort that resulted in the building of Ray and Kay Eckstein Hall—still regarded as the finest law school facility in the nation.

What I did not realize at the time I said yes, in 2005, was how profound this decision would soon become not only for me personally but for scores of others who are the true beneficiaries of three decades of collective labor. I am truly a better person for having had this privilege to serve. Memories abound—enjoying the best Reuben sandwich served up in Cassville, Wisconsin, with the late Ray and Kay Eckstein, musky fishing the Flambeau River with Marquette lawyers, or meeting the late Justice Antonin Scalia with Bob Greenheck. My career has taken me to places never imagined. For all these experiences and so much more, I am grateful.

Most of all, I am moved by what our benefactors do so willingly for our students. I will speak to them directly in closing: Your generosity speaks to a higher love—one predicated on your belief and hope in the next generation of Marquette lawyers and their ability to make this world a better place. I join you in your optimism for the future—a life lesson gleaned from looking back and giving thanks.

Continue ReadingLooking Back, Giving Thanks