Article Compares Research Results Using Westlaw and Lexis

This morning the Law Librarian Blog reports on a study that makes concrete the different research results achieved through the Westlaw and Lexis research systems.  The author of the paper, Susan Nevelow Mart, a reference librarian at UC-Hastings, provides this abstract on SSRN:

Continue ReadingArticle Compares Research Results Using Westlaw and Lexis

Legal Writing Monograph Series

13156535v1_240x240_Front_Color-BlackLast year, the Legal Writing Institute (LWI) Board of Directors created a Monograph series.  The Monograph’s first electronic volume is now available on the LWI website.  The focus of this first volume is “The Art of Critiquing Written Work.”  Our own Professor Alison Julien worked on this project.  Professor Jane Kent Gionfriddo stated in a post to the LWI listserv that the volumes “will focus on a specific topic relevant to teaching, curriculum, scholarship or status of Legal Writing professionals and will include substantial, well-developed pieces of scholarship in the form of law review articles or book chapters that have been previously published elsewhere.”

Continue ReadingLegal Writing Monograph Series

Learning About Law . . . by Watching Football?

instant replayWho knew you could learn so much about jurisprudence from the NFL rulebook?  In a new paper on SSRN, Chad Oldfather (Vikings fan) and 3L Matthew Fernholz (Bears fan) demonstrate that it is surprisingly illuminating to compare and contrast the rules of instant replay with the rules of appellate review.  Their title says it all: “Comparative Procedure on a Sunday Afternoon: Instant Replay in the NFL as a Process of Appellate Review.”  Here is the abstract:

During his confirmation hearings, Chief Justice John Roberts famously likened the judicial role to that of a baseball umpire. The increased prevalence of video evidence makes it likely that judges will find another sporting analogue for their role – that of the instant replay official in the NFL. (Indeed, many have already done so.) This Essay explores the analogy. In so doing it seeks not only to consider its appropriateness in a narrow sense (much as many commentators considered the appropriateness of the Chief Justice’s analogy), but also to conduct something of a comparative analysis and thereby to use it as a vehicle for illustrating some general characteristics of a process of decisional review.

This is a fun and — only six days until the Packers’ season opener! — timely article.

Continue ReadingLearning About Law . . . by Watching Football?