A Snapshot of the Marquette Law School in 1967

marqunBarron’s Educational Series, a leading publisher of college guides, published its first “Guide to Law Schools” in 1967.  Its profile of Marquette, one of the then 133 ABA accredited law schools, provides a picture of a law school that differs from its modern counterpart in a number of ways.  The information below was provided to Barron’s by Dean Robert H. Boden.

Size and Structure:  The school offered only a 3-year Day Division program, and the total enrollment at the school was only  260 students.

Make-up of the Student Body: Women made up only 3% of the student body—eight students. (While this was below the national average, significantly less than 10% of all law students in the mid-1960’s were female.)  Three quarters of the student body was from Wisconsin.

Faculty: The faculty consisted of 10 full-time and seven part-time instructors.  Dean Boden was in his second year as dean.  Members of the faculty included current emeritus professors Jim Ghiardi and Ray Klitzke, and Wally McBain, who passed away last year.

Library: The current law library had not yet been constructed, and the library was housed on the third floor of Sensenbrenner Hall.  Holdings totaled 54,000 volumes.

Tuition:  Tuition was $1150 per year, or $40 per credit hour.

Admissions Standards:  Applicants had only to have completed three years of college.  Would-be students were required to take the LSAT, but the school reported that primary emphasis was placed on college grades.  Fifty percent of applicants were accepted, and applicants who ranked in the top 40% of their college classes were likely to secure admission.  While applicants were encouraged to apply for admission for the fall semester, admission in the middle of the year was possible.

Placement:  There was no placement director, but a member of the full-time faculty supervised a “Placement Bureau,” which assisted students in obtaining post-law school employment.  The law school and the student bar association also published an annual “placement digest,” which contained photographs and profiles of all graduating students.  The document was distributed to law firms in the Midwest.

Degree Awarded:  The law school awarded the degree of LL.B. (bachelor of laws) to its graduates.  However, Barron’s reported that the school was considering switching the title of its degree to J.D.  (There was a national movement in the 1960’s from the LL.B. to the J.D.)  The Marquette degree qualified its holders for automatic admission to the Wisconsin Bar under the diploma privilege, as it had since 1933.  At this time, the Wisconsin Supreme Court rules required only a law degree from Marquette or the University of Wisconsin and did not stipulate any specific courses as a prerequisite for admission.

Required Courses:  Ninety credits were required for graduation.  In addition to the traditional first year courses, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law, Legal Bibliography, Property, and Torts, students were required to take Advanced Contracts, Agency and Partnership, Appellate Practice, Business Organizations, Ethics, Evidence, Federal Income Taxation, Introduction to Law, Jurisprudence, Sales, Trial Practice, Trusts and Estates, and one of Administrative Law, Labor Law, or Trade Regulations.  Moot Court participation was also mandatory.  Grades were numerical.

Financial Aid.  There were 32 full-time scholarships available each year, but this appears to have been the extent of financial aid.  Only 12-15% of the student body received financial assistance.

Legal Fraternites:  Chapters of Delta Theta Phi, Phi Alpha Delta, and Phi Delta Phi were active at the law school and appear to have played an important role in student life.

The Barron’s guide classified law schools as either “national,” “regional,” or “state.”  These classifications were based on the origins of a school’s student body and the focus of its curriculum.  Marquette was classified as a “regional” law school.  By way of contrast, the University of Wisconsin was a “national” law school, while DePaul, Loyola of Chicago, and Chicago-Kent were “state” law schools.

The guide also sought to classify schools as “most selective,” “highly selective,” “selective,” and “varying standards.”  Marquette fell into the latter category, but it appears that the guide relied on ambiguous, non-statistical information supplied by the school’s themselves to make these determinations.  Marquette’s ranking may also have been affected by the fact that it did not require its students to have earned undergraduate degrees, although by 1967 virtually all did.

Continue ReadingA Snapshot of the Marquette Law School in 1967

Obama and the Just War Doctrine

George WeigelWhen President Barack Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last October, many conservatives feared that the Nobel Committee had set a trap for the young President.  At the time, Obama was debating whether to increase troop levels in Afghanistan.  The thinking was that no leader could accept an award on the basis of bringing peace to the world, and then escalate an ongoing war.

However, to the surprise of many, President Obama not only increased troops in Afghanistan by 30,000, but he then made the case for the Afghan war directly to the Nobel Committee.  Indeed, the President made clear that some wars are not only unavoidable, but just.  “We must begin by acknowledging the hard truth: we will not eradicate violent conflict in our lifetimes.  There will be times when nations – acting individually or in concert – will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.”

With this theme in mind, the Federalist Society and St. Thomas More Society are proud to bring Catholic theologian George Weigel to Marquette University Law School next week.  Mr. Weigel will deliver the 2010 St. Thomas More Lecture in Catholic Legal Thought, entitled “President Obama’s Nobel Speech: Death or Resurrection of the Just War Doctrine?”  The event will be held on Tuesday, January 26th at noon in Eisenberg Hall.  I hope you can attend what promises to be a thoughtful lecture on the salient and timeless controversy over the notion of just wars.

Continue ReadingObama and the Just War Doctrine

Civil Procedure Fun for the Weekend

I like to begin the first day of Civil Procedure with a review of a civil action and I like to start each class with a brief recap of the last one. This year – for my review of my review – I found a musical recap – apparently made by students at that law school just to the west of us. There are some substantive problems. For example, there is no consideration of subject matter jurisdiction (“he’s from Chicago/we have diversity”) and a direct or third party claim against the law school would not be an “interpleader” – but, hey, its Madison. What can we expect when the issue isn’t Foucaultian perspectives on the gender violence implicit in the Rule Against Perpetuities? (Just kidding!) The group also apparently did not regard the ability to carry a tune to be necessary to star in a music video, but that’s kind of charming. In any event, I thought it was cute. My students seem to enjoy it – at least a little. The question for all you: Can our Dean sing better than their Dean?

Continue ReadingCivil Procedure Fun for the Weekend